KECERMATAN SISWA MENGAMATI KATA KUNCI PADA SOAL CERITA MATERI PERBANDINGAN BERBALIK NILAI

Meliyana Raharjanti, Toto Nusantara, Sri Mulyati

Abstract


The student’s observation of the problem needs to be careful. More careful in the observation, more complete information obtained in solving the problems. This article describes about student’s observation precision of keywords in the given word problems about inverse proportion. The study involved 14 boys and 18 girls’students of 7th grade. Method of data collecting are test and interview. This study shows that only some of the keywords, i.e four of the seven key words, which is observed by the students. Most other keywords not identified by the students. This indicates that students are less careful in observing the keyword in problems. Ineffectiveness the choosen keywords by students have resulted that students indicated experiencing interference.

Semakin cermat siswa mengamati soal, maka semakin lengkap informasi untuk menyelesaikan soal. Artikel ini mendeskripsikan kecermatan siswa mengamati kata kunci pada soal cerita materi perbandingan berbalik nilai. Penelitian ini melibatkan 14 siswa laki – laki dan 18 siswa perempuan kelas 7. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes dan wawancara. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hanya sebagian kata kunci, yaitu empat dari tujuh kata kunci, yang dicermati oleh siswa. Sebagian kata kunci lain tidak teridentifikasi oleh siswa. Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa siswa kurang cermat dalam mengamati kata kunci pada soal. Ketidakefektifan kata kunci yang siswa pilih ini mengakibatkan siswa terindikasi mengalami interferensi.


Keywords


inverse proportion; keywords; observe; word problems; berbalik nilai; kata kunci; mengamati; soal cerita

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, M. C. & Neely, J. H. 1996. Memory: Handbook of Perception and Cognition (Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, A. R., Ed). Academic Press.

Barwell, R. 2011. Word Problems: Connecting Language, Mathematics and Life. What Works? Research Into Practice.

Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J. & Ronning, R. R. 1990. Cognitive Psychology and Instruction 2nd Ed. Prentice-Hall.

Bruun, F. 2013. Elementary Teachers’ Perspectives of Mathematics Problem Solving Strategies.The Mathematics Educator, Vol. 23, No. 1, 45—59.

Charles, R. 2009. Solving Word Problems: Developing Students’ Quantitative Reasoning Abilities. Research Into Practice: Mathematics. Pearson Education, Inc.

Criss, A. H. dkk. 2011. Output Interference in Recognition Memory. Elsevier, Journal of Memory and Language 64 (2011) 316—326.

Edwards, S. A., Maloy, R. W., & Anderson, G. 2009. Reading Coaching for Math Word Problems. University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Lamon, S. J. 2006. Teaching Fractions and Ratios for Understanding: Essential Content Knowledge and Instructional Strategies for Teachers 2nd Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 103 Tahun 2014 tentang Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.

Raharjanti, M., Nusantara, T., & Mulyati, S. 2016.Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Perbandingan Senilai dan Berbalik Nilai. Prosiding KNPMP I UMS, 12 Maret 2016, ISSN: 2502-6526.

Roediger, H. L., Weinstein, Y. & Agarwal, P. K. 2010. Forgetting: Preliminary considerations (Editor: Sergio Della Sala). Psychology Press.

Rivas, M. P. M. 2011. Stimulating Critical Thinking Through Mathematics Word Problems. Thesis. Bogotá: Universidad de San Buenaventura.

Sajadi, M., Amiripour, P., & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. 2013. The Examining Mathematical Word Problems Solving Ability under Efficient Representation Aspect. Mathematics Education Trends and Research 2013 (2013), 1—11.

TESS-India. tanpa tahun. Word Problems in Mathematics: Identifying Key Terms and Making Connections. India.

Vilenius-Tuohimaa, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. 2008.The Association between Mathematical Word Problems and Reading Comprehension.Educational Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 4, 409—426.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i3.6169

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan




JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License