IDENTIFIKASI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN ILMIAH SISWA SMA PADA MATERI SUHU DAN KALOR

Ety Rimadani, Parno Parno, Markus Diantoro

Abstract


Scientific reasoning skills help students to explain concepts and argumentations, which is it’s beneficial for student. This article aims to identification pattern of scientific reasoning student that used to solving problems in heat and temperature material. Type of research is descriptive quantitative with 97 students. Instrument is used 4 item essay test of scientific reasoning with reliability 0.726. the scientific reasoning analyze with the rubric that level and category from pattern of correlational reasoning, proportional reasoning, and probabilistic reasoning. Results of research shows that scientific of reasoning skills in correlational reasoning 44.3% students into category of NR (no relationship). Then, in proportional reasoning 24.7% students into category of AD (Additive). In the last, in probabilistic reasoning 62.8% students into category of AP (Approximate). So, the conclusion of the research is students still in low level of category of scientific reasoning skills.

Kemampuan penalaran ilmiah membantu siswa untuk menjelaskan suatu konsep dan berargumentasi, yang mana hal tersebut mendatangkan beberapa keuntungan bagi siswa. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi pola penalaran ilmiah siswa yang digunakan dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan pada materi suhu dan kalor. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif deskriptif, dengan subjek sebanyak 97 siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa 4 butir soal uraian penalaran ilmiah dengan reliabilitas 0.726. Analisis penalaran ilmiah sesuai dengan rubrik level dan kategori dari pola correlational reasoning, proportional reasoning, dan probabilistic reasoning. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan penalaran siswa pada correlational reasoning paling banyak berkategori NR (No Relationship) sebesar 44,3%. Pada proportional reasoning paling banyak siswa berkategori AD (Additive) sebesar 24,7% dan pada probabilistic reasoning siswa paling banyak berkategori AP (Approximate) sebesar 62,8%. Dari hasil tersebut disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan penalaran ilmiah siswa masih tergolong rendah karena masih berada pada level-level terendah dalam kategori di tiap-tiap pola penalaran ilmiah yang digunakan pada butir soal.


Keywords


temperature and heat; scientific reasoning patterns; correlational reasoning; proportional reasoning; probabilistic reasoning; suhu dan kalor; pola penalaran ilmiah; correlational reasoning; proportional reasoning; probabilistic reasoning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi, H., Karplus, R. Lawson, A.E & Pulos, S. 1978. Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School VI: Correlational Reasoning. School Science and Mathematics 78 (8):675—683.

Arons, A.B. 1976. Cultivating the Capacity for Formal Reasoning: Objectives and Procedures in an Introductory Physical Science Course. American Journal of Physics, 44 (9):834—838.

Aydogan, S., Günes, B. & Gülçiçek Ç. 2003. The Misconceptions about Heat and Temperature. Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 23 (2):111—124.

Bauman, R. P. 1976. Applicability of Piagetian Theory to College Teaching. Journal of College Science Teaching, (6):94—96.

Clark, V. L. P. 2001. Research in Physics Education Group Reasoning of Young Adults and Introductory Physics: What’ s the Connection?

Coletta, V.P., Phillips, J. A., Savinainen, A. & Steinert, J.J. 2008. Comment on “The effects of students” reasoning abilities on conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills in introductory mechanics’. European Journal of Physics, 29 (5):25—27.

de Berg, K. C. 2008. “The Concepts of Heat and Temperature: The Problem of Determining the Content for the Construction of an Historical Case Study Which is Sensitive to Nature of Science Issues and Teaching–Learning Issues.” Science & Education 17 (1):75—114.

Griffiths, D. 1976. Physics Teaching, Does in Hinder Intellectual Development? American Journal of Physics 44 (1):81—86.

Herron, J. D. 1975. Piaget for Chemists. Journal of Chemical Education, (52):146—150.

Karplus, E., & Karplus, R. 1980. Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School. School Science and Mathematics, 70, 398—406.

Karplus, R. 1978. Opportunities for Concrete and Formal Thinking of Science Tasks. In Presseisen, B.Z., Goldstein, D. & Appel, M. H. (eds.) Topics in Cognitive Development. New York: Plenum Press,.

Kolodyi, G. 1975. The Cognitive Development of High School and College Science Students. Journal of College Science Teaching 5 (5):20—22.

Lamon, S. 2005. Teaching fractions and ratios understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lawson, A.E. & Renner, J.W. 1975. Relationship of Science Subject Matter and Developmental Levels of Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 12 (4):347—358.

Lawson, A.E. 2004. The nature and development of scientific reasoning: A Synthetic View. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2 (3):307—338.

Ma-Naim, C., Bar, V. & Zinn, B. 2002. Integrating microscopic macroscopic and energetic descriptions for a Conceptual Change in Thermodynamics. Paper presented in the third European Symposium on Conceptual Change, June 26—28. 2002, Turku, Finland.

Mcneill, K. L. & Krajcik, J. 2008. Inquiry and Scientific Explanations: Helping Students Use Evidence and Reasoning, 121—134.

National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards; National Academy Press: Washington, DC.

Rimadani, E. 2014. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif TPS-HPIL (Hints and Peer Interaction Learning) Untuk Mengurangi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Perpindahan Kalor Kelas VII SMP Negeri 2 Krian. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, Vol 3, No 2.

Ross, J.A. & Smyth, E. 1995. Thinking skills for Gifted Students: The case for correlational reasoning 1. Roeper Review, 17 (4):239—243.

Sayre, S. A. & Ball, D.W. 1975. Piagetian Development in Students. Journal of College Science Teachings, 5 (5):23.

Suarez, A. 1977. Formates Denken und Funktionsbegriff bei Jugendlichen. Bern, Switzerland: HansHuber.

Zohar, A. &Nemet, F. 2002. Fostering students’knowledge and argumentation skills through in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (39):35—62.

Zimmerman, C. 2005. The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills: What Psychologists Contribute to an Understanding of Elementary Science Learning. Illinois State University.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i6.9440

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Ety Rimadani, Parno Parno, Markus Diantoro

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License