Improving Motivation and Interpersonal Communication Skill ThroughPeer Assessment and Self-Assessment In Accounting Education Students

Sulikah Sulikah, Nasikh Nasikh

Abstract


This study aims at improving motivation and interpersonal communication skill through peer assessment and self-assessment in accounting education students.This study is conducted in Economic Faculty of the State University of Malang (Universitas Negeri Malang). The research subject is 160 undergraduate students of accounting education. This study is a classroom action research. The data collection is done by observation, interview, and documentation. The data are analyzed qualitatively by carrying out data reduction, data display, and verification processes. Research finding shows that peer assessment and self-assessment are able to improve motivation and communication skill of accounting education students in Economic Faculty of the State University of Malang.There is improvement in terms of learning motivation of students majoring accounting education in the teaching practice subject through peer assessment and self-assessment system, and there is improvement in terms of interpersonal communication skill of students majoring accounting education in the teaching practice subject through peer assessment and self-assessment system. 

Keywords


motivation, interpersonal communication, peer assessment, self-assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abadyo, A., &Bastari, B. (2015). Estimation of ability and item parameters in mathematics testing by using the combination of 3PLM/GRM and MCM/GPCM scoring model. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 1(1), 55–72.

Altrichter, Kemmis, McTaggart, and Skerritt. 2002. The Concept of Action Research. The Learning Organization (Online), (http://www.google.co.id) Acces 3th February 2018

Anderson, L. W. & Anderson, J. C. (1982). Affective assessment is necessary and posible. Educational Leadership, April, 524-525.

Birjandi, P., & Siyyari, M. (2010). Self-assessment and peer-assessment: A comparative study of their effect on writing performance and rating accuracy. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics.

Boud, D., &Falchikov, N. (1991).Quantitative studies of student self-assessmentin higher education: A critical analysis offindings. Higher Education

Chaney, B. A., & Ingraham, L. R. (2009). Using peer grading and proofreading to ratchet student expectations in preparing accounting cases. American Journal of Business Education.

De Vito, J. A. 1995. The Interpersonal Communication. Seventh Edition. NewYork: Harper Collins College Publisher.

Falchikov, N., &Goldfinch, J. (2000). StudentPeerassessment in highereducation : a meta analysiscomparingpeerandteachermarks. ReviewofEducationalResearch.

Gintings, Abdorrakhman. 2008. Learn and Learning. Bandung: Humaniora

Goldsworthy, Kathie & Rankine, Lynnae. 2009. Identifying the Characteristics of E-LearningEnvironments Used to Support Large Units. Proceeding Ascilet Auckland. Hooker, Mary.Models and Best Practices in Teacher Professional Development Education Specialist.http://www.glp.net/home Acces 28 March 2018.

Hancock, P., Dale-Jones, G., & Willey, K. (2013). Impact of collaborative peer and self assessment on students’ judgment and written communication. Teaching & Learning Forum.

Hirsch, M. L. & Gabriel, S. L. (1995). Feedbackstrategies: Critiqueandevaluationof oral andwrittenassignments. JournalofAccountingEducation.

Karami, A., & Rezaei, A. (2015). An overview of peer-assessment: The benefits and importance. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 3 (1), 93-100

Landry, A., Jacobs, S., & Newton, G. (2015). Effective use of peer assessment in a graduate level writing assignment: A case study. International Journal of Higher Education, 4 (1), 38-52

Muhammad, Arni. (2005). Organization Communication. Jakarta.Publisher: Bumi Aksara.

Nasikh ,Ery Tri Djatmika RWW, Budi EkoSoetjipto, GatotIsnani (2015). A Model of Affordable andHigh Quality Education Policy in Tulungagung Regency East Java Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Management ISSN 1833-3850 (Print) ISSN 1833-8119 (Online). Vol 10 No 10 (2015), 263-268. http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/52188/28593

Nielson, Kristy A.and Bryant,Ted (2005). The effectsof non-contingentextrinsicandintrinsicrewardsonmemoryconsolidation. JournalofNeurobiology of Learning and Memory. Volume 84, Issue 1, July 2005, Pages 42-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2005.03.004

Noour, Aisha Tarek & Hubbard, Nick. 2015. Self-Determination Theory: Opportunities andChallenges for Blended e-Learning in Motivating Egyptian Learners. Procedia - Social andBehavioral Sciences 182: p. 513 – 521

O’Connor, A Katherine; Greene, H Carol; Anderson, Patricia J. 2010. Action Research: A ToolFoor Improving Teacher Quality and Classroom practice. Thispaperspresented theAnnual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Francisco, CA, Apr7, 2006)

Okaz, Abeer Ali. 2015. Integrating Blended Learning in Higher Education. Procedia - Social andBehavioral Sciences 186 ( 2015 ) 600 – 603

Reese-Durham, N. (2005).Peerevaluation as anactivelearningtechnique.JournalofInstructional Technology, 32, 338–346

Reid, Anna; Petocz, Peter; & Gordon Sue. 2010. University Teacher’s Intentions for IntroductoryProfessional Classes. Journal of Workplace Learning. Vol. 22 pp. 67-7

Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., & Al-Zuhdy, Y. A. (2015). Factor analysis to identify the dimension of Test of English Proficiency (TOEP) in the listening section. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 1(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i1.4897

Rochmiyati. (2013).Peer Assessment Model in the Elaborative Collaborative Learning of Integrated Social Science in Junior High School. Education Research and Evaluation Journal, 17 (2), 333-346.

Siswaningsih, W., Dwiyanti, G., & Gumilar, C. (2013). Implementing Peer and Assessment and Self-Assessment in the Hydrocarbon Test for Tenth Graders’ Feedback. Chemistry Education Department FPMIPA, 18(1), 107-115.

Sutrisno. (2012). Learning Fluid by Using Jigsaw Method with Peer Assessment to Foster Activities, Scientific Behavior, and Achievement of XI IPA Students.Journal of Innovative Science Education. :http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jiseretrieved on 10 February 2018

Syamsudin, A., Budiyono, B., &Sutrisno, S. (2016). Model of affective assessment of primary school students. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 2(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i1.8307

Thomas, G., Martin, D., & Pleasant, K. (2011). Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance students’ future-learning in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(1), 1-17.

Tracey papinczak, Louise young and Michele groves. (2005). Advances in Health Sciences Education (2005) 12:169–186. Springer. 2005. DOI 10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6

Twigg, A. Carol. 2003. New Models for Online Learning. Educause September/October 2003

Walgito, B. 2001. Social Psychology: An Introduction. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Willey, K. &Freeman, M. (2006). Improvingteamworkandengagement: The caseforselfandpeerassessment. AustralasianJournalof Engineering Education. http://www.aaee.com.au/journal/2006/willey0106.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26675/jabe.v3i1.11559

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Sulikah Sulikah, Nasikh Nasikh

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This Journal Indexed by:

            

 

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.