Email this article Level of Knowledge Construction in Elementary School Students: Lesson Plan Analysis
Abstract
Abstract: The curriculum should always be updated in line with the changes to keep it relevant to the changing society. The main reason of curriculum changing is as the revision, evaluation, and correction of the previous curriculum. The objective of doing curriculum evaluation is to know whether the currently used curriculum in Indonesia already meet the rubric of 21st CLD and Language Curriculum Design from Nation and Macalister. The research design used in this study was qualitative research. This study applied content analysis approach which focused on senior high school curriculum for English subject. It resulted that 2013 Curriculum used in Indonesia already tried to fulfill the Language Curriculum Design proposed by Nation and Macalister and promote 21st CLS, especially skilled communication.
Key Words: curriculum evaluation; language curriculum design; 21st century learning skills; skilled communication
Abstrak: Kurikulum harus selalu diperbarui sejalan dengan perubahan agar tetap relevan dengan ma-syarakat yang berubah. Alasan utama perubahan kurikulum adalah sebagai revisi, evaluasi, dan koreksi kurikulum sebelumnya. Tujuan melakukan evaluasi kurikulum adalah untuk mengetahui apakah kurikulum yang saat ini digunakan di Indonesia telah memenuhi rubrik CLD ke-21 dan Desain Kurikulum Bahasa dari Nation and Macalister. Desain penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Penelitian ini menerapkan pendekatan analisis konten yang berfokus pada kurikulum sekolah menengah atas untuk mata pelajaran bahasa Inggris. Hasilnya, Kurikulum 2013 yang digunakan di In-donesia telah dicoba untuk memenuhi Desain Kurikulum Bahasa yang diusulkan oleh Nation and Macalister dan mempromosikan CLS ke-21, khususnya komunikasi yang terampil.
Kata kunci: evaluasi kurikulum, desain kurikulum bahasa, keterampilan belajar abad ke-21, komunikasi yang terampil
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alhamuddin. (2018). Sejarah kurikulum di Indonesia: Studi analisis keijakan pengembangan kurikulum. Bandung.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L., & Sorensen C. (2010). Introduction to research in education: Eighth edition (8nd). Nelson Education: Belmont.
Beers, Sue. (2011). Teaching 21st century skills: An ASCD action tool. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Dyers, J.H., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C.M. (2011). Innovators dna. Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.
Frankel, J. R & Wallen, N. E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw hill Inc.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Hutchinson, Tom & Waters, Alan. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1973). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.
Long, M. H. & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design–The case for task. In G. Crookes and S.M Gass. Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp: 92–118). Adelaide: Multilingual Matters.
McNeil, J. D. (1985). Curriculum: A comprehensive introduction. Boston: Little Brown.
Microsoft Partners in Learning. (2012). 21st century learning design rubrics. ITL Research.
Mullis, I. V.S., Martin, M.O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Reports. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Mustadi, A. (2011). English syllabus design for elementary school teacher education department, faculty of education, State University of Yogyakarta: A study to develop an alternative English syllabus (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of Semarang, Indonesia.
Nation, I.S.P. & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. New Zealand: Routledge.
OECD/Asian Development Bank. (2015). Education in Indonesia: Rising to the challenge. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264230750-en.
Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang–Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Fokus Media.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2007). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
The World Bank. (2010). Transforming Indonesia’s teaching force: Volume I executive summary. Jakarta: The World Bank Office Jakarta.
Zais, R. S. (1976). Curriculum, principles, and foundations. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Malang
|
