Email this article The Influence of Learning Lc 5e Scaffolding on Cognitive Learning Outcomes and Conceptual understanding on Reaction Rate Topic
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences in student learning outcomes between learning using scaffolding and none. It also to find whether there were differences in Science Process Skills of students between learning to use scaffolding and none. The research subjects were 72 students of XI_A_ 1 and XI_A_3. It was found that (1) There are differences in HBK between both classes The experiment class had higher learning outcomes (86) than others (79); and (2) There are differences in KPS between both classes. The experiment class had higher learning outcomes (83.3) compared to others (78.5).
Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan hasil belajar siswa antara belajar menggunakan perancah dan tidak ada. Ini juga untuk menemukan apakah ada perbedaan Keterampilan Proses Sains siswa antara belajar menggunakan perancah dan tidak ada. Subjek penelitian adalah 72 siswa XI_A_ 1 dan XI_A_3. Ditemukan bahwa, (1) Ada perbedaan dalam HBK antara kedua kelas. Kelas eksperimen memiliki hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi (86) daripada yang lain (79); dan (2) Ada perbedaan dalam KPS antara kedua kelas. Kelas eksperimen memiliki hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi (83,3) dibandingkan dengan yang lain (78,5)Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adesoji, F. A., & Idika, M. I. (2015). EFFECTS OF 7E LEARNING CYCLE MODEL AND CASE-BASED LEARNING STRATEGY ON SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES IN CHEMISTRY. 19(1), 11.
Akgunduz, D., & Akinoglu, O. (2016). The Effect of Blended Learning and Social Media-Supported Learning on the Students’ Attitude and Self-Directed Learning Skills in Science Education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 10.
Anil, Ö., & Batdi, V. (2015). A Comparative Meta-Analysis of 5E and Traditional Approaches in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(6), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i6.1038
Awada, G., & Diab, H. B. (2018). The Effect of Google Earth and Wiki Models on Oral Presentation Skills of University EFL Learners. 11.
Cakır, N. K. (2017). Effect of 5E Learning Model on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Science Process Skills: Meta-Analysis Study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(11), 157. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i11.2649
Sawuwu, B. Y., Partana, C. F.,. (2018). Exploring Metacognitive Judgment of Chemistry Teacher Candidates on Chemical Reading Activity. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1146a
Suardana, I. N., Redhana, I. W., Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. R., (2018). Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Chemistry Learning Using Local Culture-Based 7E Learning Cycle Model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11227a
Sudria, I. B. N., Redhana, I. W., Kirna, I. M. K., (2018). Effect of Kolb’s Learning Styles under Inductive Guided-Inquiry Learning on Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1117a
Hartati, T. A. W., Corebima, A. D., & Suwono, H. (2015-b). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terstruktur dan Siklus Belajar 5E terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa pada Kemampuan Akademik Berbeda. 9.
Heilmann, S. (2018). A Scaffolding Approach Using Interviews and Narrative Inquiry. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1279
Hokkanen, S. L. (2011). IMPROVING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT, INTEREST AND CONFIDENCE IN SCIENCE THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 5E LEARNING CYCLE IN THE MIDDLE GRADES OF AN URBAN SCHOOL. 93.
IBM SPSS Statistics Version 25: Windows Installation Instructions (Authorized User License).(2017). 10.
Jack, G. U. (2017). The effect of learning cycle constructivist-based approach on students’ academic achievement and attitude towards chemistry in secondary schools in north-eastern part of Nigeria. 11.
Memari Hanjani, A. (2019b). Collective peer scaffolding, self-revision, and writing progress of novice EFL learners : International Journal of English Studies, 19(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.331771
Palompon Institute of Technology, Palompon Leyte, Philippines, & Tabinas, C. A. (2019). Teaching styles and instructional flows in chemistry course: A pattern for a 5-step, 5-cycle teaching model. African Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.72.19.006
Peltola, A. (2018). The Classroom as Think Tank: Small Groups, Authentic Exercises, and Instructional Scaffolding in an Advanced Writing Course. 12.
Permendikbud Tahun 2016 Nomor 021 (2016).
Rahmi, Y., Ratmanida, D., & Ed, M. (2014). THE USE OF DISCOVERY LEARNING STRATEGY IN TEACHING READING REPORT TEXTS TO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS. 3, 10.
Ramaekers, S., van Keulen, H., Kremer, W., Pilot, A., & van Beukelen, P. (2011). Effective Teaching in Case-based Education: Patterns in Teacher Behavior and Their Impact on the Students’ Clinical Problem Solving and Learning. 11.
Sadi, Ö., & Çakiroğlu, J. (2010). Effects of 5E Learning Cycle on Students’ Human Circulatory System Achievement. 5.
Senturk, H. E., & Camliyer, H. (2016b). A New Learning Model on Physical Education: 5E Learning Cycle. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040104
Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2018). Effect of Motivational Scaffolding on E-Learning Environments: Self-Efficacy, Learning Achievement, and Cognitive Style. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.5
Vincentrisia, A. (2015). APPLICATION OF LEARNING CYCLE MODEL (5E) LEARNING WITH CHART VARIATION TOWARDSTUDENTS’ CREATIVITY. 11.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jps.v8i3.14080
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Vocational Education Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
