Email this article 
Meningkatkan Kemampuan Bekerja dengan Grafik melalui Pembelajaran Kinematika
Abstract
Abstract: This research examines the increase of students’ ability in working with graph. This research is conducted by involving 58 students in class X SMA Negeri 5 Malang as the subjects. Students are given kinematics learning by making models of various representations including graphics. The ability of students are assessed using multiple choice questions in graphic format. The improvement of students’ ability is observed from the average score pretest and posttest. The analysis shows that there is a significant increase (p = 0.00) with the results of the N-Gain calculation of 0.25 including the medium category. Students are able to change the understanding of graph after learning even though the WYSIWYG effect is still very influential on the way students interpretation graph.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini mengkaji peningkatan kemampuan siswa bekerja dengan grafik. Penelitian dilakukan dengan subjek 58 siswa kelas X SMA N 5 Malang. Siswa diberikan pembelajaran kinematika dengan membuat model berbagai representasi termasuk grafik. Kemampuan siswa diukur menggunakan soal-soal multiple choice dalam format grafik. Peningkatan kemampuan siswa ditinjau dari skor rata-rata pretest dan posttest. Analisis menunjukkan ada peningkatan signifikan (p=0,000) dengan hasil perhitungan N-Gain sebesar 0,25 termasuk kategori sedang. Siswa mampu mengubah pemahaman tentang grafik setelah pembelajaran meskipun efek WYSIWYG masih sangat berpengaruh pada cara siswa menginterpretasikan grafik.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Beichner, R. J. (2014). Testing Student Interpretation of Kinematics Graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62(8), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17449
Bollen, L., De Cock, M., Zuza, K., Guisasola, J., & van Kampen, P. (2016). Generalizing a Categorization of Students’ Interpretations of Linear Kinematics Graphs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010108
Ceuppens, S., Bollen, L., Deprez, J., Dehaene, W., & De Cock, M. (2019). 9th Grade Students’ Understanding and Strategies when Solving x (t) Problems in 1D Kinematics and y (x) Problems in Mathematics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010101
Christensen, W. M., & Thompson, J. R. (2012). Investigating Graphical Representations of Slope and Derivative without a Physics Context. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.023101
Elby, A. (2000). What Students’ Learning of Representations Tells us about Constructivism. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00054-2
Hake, R. R. (2008). Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hale, P. (2000). Kinematics and Graphs: Students’ Difficulties and CBLs. The Mathematics Teacher, 93(5), 4.
McDermott, L. C., Rosenquist, M. L., & Zee, E. H. V. (2006). Student Difficulties in Connecting Graphs and Physics: Example from Kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 55(6). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15104
McPadden, D., & Brewe, E. (2017). Impact of the second semester University Modeling Instruction course on students’ representation choices. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020129
Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Karen C. Barrett. (2004). SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Nguyen, D. H., & Rebello, N. S. (2011). Students’ Understanding and Application of the Area Under the Curve Concept in Physics Problems. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.010112
Nixon, R. S., Godfrey, T. J., Mayhew, N. T., & Wiegert, C. C. (2016). Undergraduate Student Construction and Interpretation of Graphs in Physics Lab Activities. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010104
Planinic, M., Milin-Sipus, Z., Katic, H., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. (2012). Comparison of Student Understanding of Line Graph Slope In Physics and Mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1393–1414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9344-1
Susac, A., Bubic, A., Kazotti, E., Planinic, M., & Palmovic, M. (2018). Student understanding of graph slope and area under a graph: A comparison of physics and nonphysics students. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020109
Wemyss, T., & van Kampen, P. (2013). Categorization of First-Year University Students’ Interpretations of Numerical Linear Distance-Time Graphs. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010107
Zucker, A., Kay, R., & Staudt, C. (2013). Helping Students Make Sense of Graphs: An Experimental Trial of SmartGraphs Software. 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9475-3
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i3.12067
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Nurul Hidayah, Sutopo Sutopo, Hari Wisodo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
