Email this article 
Keterampilan Geometri Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele Level Analisis
Abstract
Abstract: This research was aimed to describe the geometry skills of students at Van Hiele's level of analysis. This study uses descriptive qualitative methods. Data is collected through interviews, recording, and student work. The research subjects amounted to 2 students, namely those who reached the level of analysis according to Van Hiele's theory in the 4th grade. The results of this study were students who reached the level of analysis according to Van Hiele's theory were able to do the questions well on visual, verbal, drawing, and applied skills even though they could not be fully completed. As for logic skills, the analysis level students are unable to answer the question correctly.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keterampilan geometri siswa level analisis Van Hiele. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, perekaman, dan pekerjaan siswa. Subjek penelitian berjumlah dua orang siswa yaitu siswa yang mencapai level analisis menurut teori Van Hiele di kelas IV. Hasil penelitian ini adalah siswa yang mencapai level analisis menurut teori Van Hiele mampu mengerjakan soal dengan baik pada keterampilan visual, verbal, menggambar, dan terapan meskipun belum sepenuhnya dapat diselesaikan. Untuk keterampilan logika, siswa level analisis tidak mampu menjawab soal tersebut dengan benar.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Astuti, R., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi. (2018). Analysis on Geometry Skills of Junior High School Students on the Concept Congruence Based on Van Hiele’s Geometric Thinking Level. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132, 12036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012036
Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2016). Characterizing the van Hiele Levels of Development in Geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31–48.
Crowley, M. (2017). The van Hiele Model of the Development of Geometric Thought. Yearbook of National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.csmate.colostate.edu/docs/math/mathactivities/june2007/The van Hiele Model of the Development of Geometric Thought.pdf
Heruman. (2007). Model Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Hofer, A. (2008). Geometry Is More Than Proof. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 17(4), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312708091929
Kim, Y. R. (2016). Analysis of Teaching of Van Hiele Geometry in Schools In Korea. Proceedings of 4thInternational Congress of Educational Sciences and Development, 9(June), 21–25.
Musser, G.L., Burger, W.F., & Peterson, B. E. 2011. Mathematics for Elementary Teachers, a Contemporary Approach (9th ed.). America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standars for School Mathematics. United States of America: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Ningrum, R. W., Yulianti, M., Helingo, D. D. Z., & Budiarto, M. T. (2018). Students’ Misconceptions on Properties of Rectangles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012018
Ozkan, M., & Bal, A. P. (2017). Analysis of the Misconceptions of 7th Grade Students on Polygons and Specific Quadrilaterals. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(67), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.67.10
Prabowo, A. & Ristiani, E. (2011). Rancang Bangun Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Keruangan Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Keruangan Hubert Maeier dan Identifikasi Penskoran Berdasar Teori Van Hiele. Jurnal Kreano, 2(2), 72-87.
Rafianti, I. (2016). Identifikasi Tahap Berpikir Geometri Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Ditinjau dari Tahap Berpikir Van Hiele. JPPM (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 9(2), 159–164.
Rahimah, N., & Asy’ari. (2017). Keterampilan Dasar Geometri Siswa Kelas V Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Bangun Datar Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika di MI AL Istiqomah Banjarmasin. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 55–63.
Škrbec, M., & Čadež, T. H. (2015). Identifying and Fostering Higher Levels of Geometric Thinking. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1339a
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sunardi., & Yudianto, E. (2000). Antisipasi Siswa Level Analisis Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri. AdMathEdu: Mathematics Education, Mathematics, and Applied Mathematics Journal, 5(2), 203-215.
Usiskin, Z. (1982). Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry: Final report of the Cognitive Development and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry (CDASSG) Project. US: Department of Education, University of Chicago.
Vojkuvkova, I. (2012). The van Hiele Model of Geometric Thinking. WDS’12 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, 1, 72–75.
Watan, S., & Sugiman. (2018). Exploring the Relationship Between Teachers’ Instructional and Students’ Geometrical Thinking Levels based on Van Hiele Theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012122
Wu, D. B. & Ma, H. L. (2006). The Distributions of Van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thinking Among 1st Through 6th Graders. Proceedings 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 5, 409–416.
Wu, D. B. & Ma, H. L. (2010). Development of Wu-Ma Test of the Van Hiele Levels of Geometrical Thinking Based on Grey Relational Analysis. New Aspects of Signal Processing, Computational Geometry and Artificial Vision, (August 2010), 110–114.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i3.12068
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Widi Candika Pakaya, Abdul Qohar, Susiswo Susiswo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
