Email this article 
Keefektifan Modul Berbasis Guided Inquiry dilengkapi Komik terhadap Kemampuan Berargumentasi ditinjau dari Minat Baca Siswa
Abstract
Abstract: This research aims to examine the effectiveness of Guided Inquiry-Based Modules Supplied with Comics on The Subject Matter of Human Digestive System to Improve the Argumentation Skills of the students with high and low reading motivation. The used method was a quasi-experiment with 2x2 factorial design. The researcher used an intact group technique to determine the sample. The sample was divided into two groups, namely the control group and the experimental group. In addition, each sample groups were divided into two groups of high reading motivation and low reading motivation. The instrument used to obtain the data of argumentation skill was an essay test based on the indicators of Argumentation Skills. The instrument of reading motivation used the Motivations for Reading Questionnaire (MRQ). Data Analysis using ANCOVA test with a significance level of <0.05. The results of the data analysis showed the Guided Inquiry-Based Modules Supplied with Comics on the Subject Matter of Human Digestive System effective toward students’ Argumentation Skills.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji efektivitas modul berbasis guided inquiry pada materi sistem pencernaan manusia dilengkapi komik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berargumentasi siswa dengan minat baca tinggi dan rendah. Metode yang digunakan adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2x2. Peneliti menggunakan teknik intact group untuk menentukan sampel. Sampel dibagi menjadi dua kelompok, yaitu kelompok kontrol dan kelompok eksperimen. Selain itu, masing-masing kelompok sampel dibagi menjadi dua kelompok minat baca tinggi dan minat baca rendah. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk memperoleh data kemampuan berargumentasi adalah tes esai berdasarkan indikator kemampuan berargumentasi. Instrumen minat baca menggunakan Motivations for Reading Questionnaire (MRQ). Analisis data menggunakan uji anakova dengan tingkat signifikansi <0,05. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan modul berbasis guided inquiry dilengkapi komik pada materi sistem pencernaan manusia efektif terhadap kemampuan berargumentasi siswa.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Carol, C. Kuhltau., Leslie K. Maniotes., & Ann K. Caspari. (2007). Guided Inquiry: Learning in The 21st Century School. Libraries Unlimited.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Dahlia., Ibrohim., & Mahanal, S. (2018). Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP Menggunakan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Sumber Belajar Hutan Wisata Baning. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(2), 188–194.
Daryanto. (2013). Menyusun Modul Bahan Ajar untuk Persiapan Guru Dalam Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Gava Media
Deane, P., & Song, Y. (2014). A Case Study in Principled Assessment Design: Designing assessments to measure and support the development of argumentative reading and writing skills. Psicología Educativa, 20(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.10.001
Guthrie, J. T. (2010). Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420-432.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Jamie, L., & Cox, K. E. (2009). Scientific Studies of Reading Motivational and Cognitive Predictors of Text Comprehension and Reading Amount, (October 2014), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303
Hendarto, P., Rinanto, Y., & Ramli, M. (2016). Penerapan Desain Pembelajaran Sistem Respirasi Berbasis Guided Inquiry Learning Dipadu AFL untuk Mengubah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, (2010), 317–330.
Krajcik, J. S., & McNeill, K. L. (2011). Assessing Middle School Students’ Content Knowledge and Scientific Reasoning Through Written Explanations.
Krajcik, J., & McNeill, K. L. (2011). Supporting Students Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fadding Scaffolds in Instructional Materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences
Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2007). Guided Inquiry Learning in the 21st Century.
Okumus, S., & Unal, S. (2012). The effects of argumentation model on students’ achievement and argumentation skills in science. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.141
Peter W. van Rijn, E. Aurora Graf, Paul Deane. (2014). Empirical recovery of argumentation learning progressions in scenario-based assessments of English language arts. Psicología Educativa 20 (2014) 109-115. Educational Testing Service Global, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Prawita, W., Prayitno, B. A., & Sugiyarto. (2019). Effectiveness of a Generative Learning-Based Biology Module to Improve the Analytical Thinking Skills of the Students with High and Low Reading Motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1459–1476.
Prayitno, B. A., Corebima, D., Susilo, H., Zubaidah, S., & Ramli, M. (2017). Closing The Science Process Skills Gap Between Students with High and Low Level. Jurnal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 266–277.
Pritasari, C., Dwiastuti, S., Probosari, R. M., & Sajidan. (2015). The Argumentation Capacity Improvement Through The Problem Based Learning Implementation In Class X MIA 1 SMA Batik 2 Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i2.4185
Probosari, R. M., Widyastuti, F., Sajidan, S., Suranto, S., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Reading for tracing evidence : developing scientific knowledge through science text. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022.
Ramli, M., Rakhmawati, E., Hendarto, P., & Winarni. (2017). Process of Argumentation in High School Biology Class : A Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 12007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001
Salam, S. (2010). Animasi Kartun dari Analog Sampai Digital. Jakarta: Indeks.
Salikin, H., Bin-tahir, S. Z., Kusumaningputri, R., & Yuliandari, D. P. (2017). The Indonesian EFL Learners’ Motivation in Reading, 10(5), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n5p81
Schiefele, U. (2009). Scientific Studies of Reading Interest and Learning from Text, (November 2014), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303
Slameto. (2013). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif, R & D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Toulmin. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Wahyuningsih, S., & Mustadi, A. (2018). Tingkat Motivasi Membaca Siswa Dilihat dari Perilaku Sosial yang Menunjukkan Sikap Minat Membaca, (January), 0–9.
Wigfield, A. (2000). Expectancy – Value Theory of Achievement Motivation, 81, 68–81https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i12.12560
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Puji Hendarto, Maridi Maridi, Baskoro Adi Prayitno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
