Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Mengidentifikasikan dan Menggambarkan Diagram Gaya
Abstract
Abstract: Conceptual understanding is one indicator of success in learning. Mastery of concepts is seen when someone can solve a problem. This study aims to see student's mistakes in identifying and describing diagrams of force, particle dynamics. This type of research uses quantitative descriptive research with survey methods, research subjects amounted to 97 students. The technique of collecting data in the form of reasoned multiple choice tests with alpha cronbach is 0,68. The results of the study show that almost all students experience errors in identifying and describing the style diagrams that work on a system. Common mistakes that cause students to fail to work on problems well are because students are more likely to memorize mathematical formulations of a concept, without knowing how the concept is formed.
Abstrak: Pemahaman konsep yang baik merupakan salah satu indikator keberhasilan dalam pembelajaran. Penguasaan konsep terlihat ketika seseorang dapat memecahkan suatu permasalahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat kesalahan siswa dalam mengidentifikasikan dan menggambarkan diagram gaya suatu permasalahan fisika materi dinamika partikel. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif dengan metode survei. Subjek penelitian berjumlah 97 orang. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa tes pilihan ganda beralasan dengan alpha Cronbach 0,68. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan hampir seluruh siswa mengalami kesalahan dalam mengidentifikan dan menggambarkan diagram gaya yang bekerja pada suatu sistem. Kesalahan umum yang menyebabkan siswa gagal mengerjakan soal dengan baik dikarenakan siswa lebih cenderung menghapal perumusan matematis dari suatu konsep, tanpa mengetahui bagaimana konsep terbentuk.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of Students’ Errors in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133
Ayesh, A., Qamhieh, N., & Abdelfattah, F. (2010). The Effect of Student Use of the Free-Body Diagram Representation on their Performance. Educational Research, 1(10), 505–511.
Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2014a). Force, Velocity, and Work: The Effects of Different Contexts on Students Understanding of Vector Concepts Using Isomorphic Problems. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020115
Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2014b). Test of Understanding of Vectors: A Reliable Multiple-Choice Vector Concept Test. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010121
Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2009). “Force,” Ontology, and Language. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010110
Cummings, K., Laws, P., Redish, E., & Patrick, C. (2004). Understanding Physics is based on Fundamental of Physics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual Problem Solving in High School Physics. 020106, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020106
Flores, S., Kanim, S. E., & Kautz, C. H. (2004). Student Use of Vectors in Introductory Mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 72(4), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1648686
Heckler, A. F., & Scaife, T. M. (2015). Adding and Subtracting Vectors: The Problem with the Arrow Representation. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.010101
Ishimoto, M., Davenport, G., & Wittmann, M. C. (2017). Use of Item Response Curves of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation to compare Japanese and American Students ’ Views on Force and Motion. 020135, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020135
Januarifin, D., Parno., & Hidayat, A. (2018). Kesalahan Siswa SMA dalam Memecahkan Masalah pada Materi Hukum. (April 2018). https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v1i1.2292
Knight, R. D. (1995). The Vector Knowledge of Beginning Physics Students. The Physics Teacher, 33, 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344143
Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of Multipe Representation use by Experts and Novices During Physics Problem Solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111
Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2013). To Use or Not to Use Diagrams : The Effect of Drawing a Diagram in Solving Introductory Physics Problems. 282. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789707
Morphew, J. W., Mestre, J. P., Ross, B. H., & Strand, N. E. (2015). Do experts and novices direct attention differently in examining physics diagrams? A study of change detection using the flicker technique. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020104
Nguyen, N.-L., & Meltzer, D. E. (2003). Initial Understanding of Vector Concepts among Students in Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 71(6), 630–638. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1571831
Resbiantoro, G., & Nugraha, A. W. (2017). Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa pada Konsep Dasar Gaya dan Gerak untuk Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 5(2), 80–87.
Rosengrant, D., Van Heuvelen, A., & Etkina, E. (2009). Do Students Use and Understand Free-Body Diagrams? Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010108
Saepuzaman, D., Indonesia, U. P., Samsudin, A., Indonesia, U. P., & Sutrisno, A. D. (2014). Diagnosis Kesulitan-kesulitan Siswa dalam Konsep Gerak dan Gaya ( Sebuah Penelitian Survey ). (June 2016).
Serway, & Jewett. (2006). Physics for Scientists and Engineers. In Journal of College Science Teaching (Vol. 36). https://doi.org/013613923X
Shaffer, P. S., & McDermott, L. C. (2005). A Research-Based Approach to Improving Student Understanding of the Vector Nature of Kinematical Concepts. American Journal of Physics, 73(10), 921–931. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2000976
Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and Critical Thinking: Independent or Overlapping Components? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27(January 2017), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i7.12612
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Uulia ‘Iffa, Edi Supriana, Sutopo Sutopo
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License |