Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa Field Dependent Berdasarkan Kerangka Berpikir Mason

Ika Rahayu Sintiya Dewi, Tjang Daniel Chandra, Hery Susanto

Abstract


Abstract: The aim of this study is to describe field dependent students’ thinking process based on Mason’s thinking stcructure. Man and woman field dependent subject used all of aspect exclude introduce aspect in entry phase and why in attack phase. Man subject got stuck ones and he believed that his solution can answer the problem. Women subject get twice stuck and the solution can’t answer the problem.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses berpikir mahasiswa field dependent berdasarkan kerangka berpikir matematis Mason. Subjek field dependent laki-laki dan perempuan memenuhi semua aspek kecuali aspek introduce pada fase entry dan why pada fase attack. Perbedaannya yaitu subjek 1 mengalami stuck 1 kali dan percaya bahwa hasil pekrjaannya telah dapat menjawab persoalan dan subjek 2 mengalami 2 kali stuck dan tidak dapat menyelesaikan masalah yang diberikan.

Keywords


thought process; field dependent; Mason's frame of mind; proses berpikir; field dependent; kerangka berpikir Mason

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadzade, L., & Shojae, M. (2013). Investigating the Relationship between Cognitive Style (Filed Dependence/Independence) and Academic Achievement in Male and Female Students of Behbahan Islamic Azad University. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine, 3(3), 245–249.

Mohammad, M. (2017). Proses Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah Polya Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif dan Gender. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Altun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate Students’ Academic Achievement, Field Dependent/Independent Cognitive Styles and Attitude Toward Computers. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 289–297.

Azari, S., Radmehr, F., Mohajer, M., & Alamolhodaei, H. (2013). A Study on the Relationship Between Students Cognitive Style and Mathematical Word and Procedural Problem Solving While Controlling for Students’ Intelligent Quotient and Math Anxiety. European Journal of Child Development, 1(2), 59–73.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research (Fourth Ed). Boston: Pearson.

Delima, N. (2017). a Relationship Between Problem Solving Ability and Students’ Mathematical Thinking. Infinity Journal, 6(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i1.231

Ersoy, E., & Guner, P. (2015). The Place of Problem Solving and Mathematical Thinking. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 5(1), 120–130.

Guisande, M. A., Páramo, M. F., Tinajero, C., & Almeida, L. S. (2007). Field Dependence-Independence (FDI) Cognitive Style: An Analysis of Attentional Functioning. Psicothema, 19(4), 572–577.

Kepner, M. D., & Neimark, E. D. (1984). Test-Retest Reliability and Differential Patterns of Score Change on the Group Embedded Figures Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1405–1413. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1405

Naurzalina, D., Karimova, A., Sarkulov, M., Tolegenova, A., & Zholamanova, Ainura Almurzayeva, B. (2015). Cognitive Style and Gender Differencies in Spatial Abilities. In The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (pp. 95–105). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2015.01.11

NCTM. (2000). Principle and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: The National Council of Teacher of Mathematics, Inc.

Sanjaya, A., Johar, R., Ikhsan, M., & Khairi, L. (2018). Students’ Thinking Process in Solving Mathematical Problems Based on the Levels of Mathematical Ability. In The 6th South East Asia Design Reserch International Conference (Vol. 1088). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012116

Sozcu, O. F. (2014). The Relationships Between Cognitive Style of Field Dependence and Learner Variables in E-Learning Instruction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.11039

Stacey, K. (2007). What Is Mathematical Thinking and Why Is It Important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429

Sukoriyanto, S., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., & Chandra, T. D. (2016). Students’ Errors in Solving the Permutation and Combination Problems Based on Problem Solving Steps of Polya. International Education Studies, 9(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n2p11

Wechsler, S. M. (2009). Age and Gender Impact on Thinking and Creating Styles. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 2(1), 37–48.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i7.12643

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Ika Rahayu Sintiya Dewi, Tjang Daniel Chandra, Hery Susanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License