Email this article 
Literasi Saintifik Siswa SMA pada Hukum Archimedes
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims to describe and describe students scientific literacy Archimedes law. This research was conducted at Ambulu Public High School with 34 students in the XI MIA 5 class. Data was collected through tests. The student scientific literacy test instrument in the Archimedes law uses three essay questions with Cronbach’s alpha reliability 0.548. Scientific literacy of students is at a nominal level, which means students mention scientific concepts and explain understanding but misconceptions. Scientific literacy of students because students can't be associated knowledge with the phenomenon and teacher not accustomed to using his knowledge on scientific phenomena so that the learning applied learning materials do not link with everyday life.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menggambarkan literasi saintifik siswa pada Hukum Archimedes. Penelitian ini dilakukan di SMAN Ambulu dengan subjek sebanyak 34 siswa pada kelas XI MIA 5. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui tes. Instrumen tes literasi saintifik siswa pada Hukum Archimedes menggunakan tiga soal esai dengan nilai reliabilitas Cronbach’s alpha 0,548. Literasi saintifik siswa berada pada level nominal yang berarti siswa menyebutkan konsep sains dan menjelaskan pemahaman tetapi miskonsepsi. Literasi saintifik siswa disebabkan karena siswa tidak dapat mengasosiasi pengetahuan dengan fenomena dan tidak terbiasa menggunakan pengetahuannya pada fenomena ilmiah sehingga pembelajaran yang diterapkan tidak menghubungkan materi pembelajaran dengan kehidupan sehari-hari.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adolphus, T., & Arokoyu, A. A. (2012). Improving Scientific Literacy Among Secondary School Students Through Integration of Information and Communication Technology. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, 2(5), 444–448.
Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Project Based Learning Integrated to STEM to Enhance Elementary School’s Students Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5493
Al-Momani, F. N. N. (2016). Assessing the Development of Scientific Literacy among Undergraduates College of Education. Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v6i2.9405
Berek, F. X., Sutopo., & Munzil. (2016). Concept Enhancement of Junior High School Students in Hydrostatic Pressure and Archimedes Law by Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.6038
Besson, U. (2004). Students’ Conceptions of Fluids. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1683–1714. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000243745
Crowell, A., & Schunn, C. (2016). Unpacking the Relationship Between Science Education and Applied Scientific Literacy. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9462-1
Diana, S., Rachmatulloh, A., & Rahmawati, E. S. (2015). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA Berdasarkan Instrumen Scientific Literacy Assesments ( SLA ) High School Students ’ Scientific Literacy Profile Based on Scientific Literacy Assessments ( SLA ) Instruments. Seminar Nasional XII Pendidikan Biologi 2015 FKIP UNS, 285–291.
Hahn, I., Schöps, K., Rönnebeck, S., Martensen, M., Hansen, S., Saß, S., … Prenzel, M. (2013). Assessing Scientific Literacy over the Lifespan - A Description of the NEPS Science Framework and the Test development/Die Erfassung Naturwissenschaftlicher Kompetenz üBer Die Lebensspanne - eine Beschreibung der Rahmenkonzeption Und der Entwicklung Des N. Journal for Educational Research Online, 5(2), 110.
Kuczmann, I. (2017). The Structure of Knowledge and Students’ Misconceptions in Physics, 050001. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5017454
Kural, M., & Kocakülah, S. M. (2016). Teaching for Hot Conceptual Change: Towards a New Model, Beyond the Cold and Warm Ones. European Journal of Education Studies, 2(8), 1–40.
Kusairi, S., Alfad, H., & Zulaikah, S. (2017). Development of Web-Based Intelligent Tutoring (iTutor) to Help Students Learn Fluid Statics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10194a
Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. L. (2003). Helping Students Develop an Understanding of Archimedes’ Principle. I. Research on student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 71(11), 1178–1187. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1607335
Menia, M., Mudzakir, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2017). The Effect of Conceptual Metaphors Through Guided Inquiry on Student’s Conceptual Change. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983977
Nwosu, A. A., & Ibe, E. (2014). Gender and Scientific Literacy Levels : Implications for Sustainable Science and Technology Education ( STE ) for the 21 st Century Jobs. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(8), 113–118.
OECD (2016), PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-en.
Puspita, I., Kaniawati, I., & Suwarma, I. R. (2017). Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills on the Topic of Static Fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012100
Putra, M. I. S., Widodo, W., & Jatmiko, B. (2016). The Development of Guided Inquiry Science Learning Materials to Improve Science Literacy Skill of Prospective MI Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.57946596/755/1/011001
Riskawati., Azis, A., Rusli, M. A., & Yunus, S. R. (2015). Analysis Student’s Level of Science Literacy in Class X SMAN Khusus Jeneponto. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education, 53-57.
Ristanto, R. H., Zubaidah, S., Amin, M., & Rohman, F. (2017). Scientific Literacy of Students Learned Through Guided Inquiry. International Journal of Research & Review, 4(5), 23–30.
Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., Pursitasari, I. D., & Permana, I. (2017). Professional Development Model for Science Teachers based on Scientific Literacy. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001
Rokhmah, A., Sunarno, W., & Masykuri, M. (2017). Science Literacy Indicators in Optical Instruments of Highschool Physics Textbooks Chapter. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 13(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v13i1.8391
Series, C. (2017). Science Literacy : How do High School Students Solve PISA Test Items ? Science Literacy : How do High School Students Solve PISA Test Items ? https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012166
Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The Use of Scientific Literacy Taxonomy for Assessing the Development of Chemical Literacy among High-School Students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90011A
Sikas, N. (2017). Enhancing Scientific Literacy through Implementation of Inquiry-Based Science Education (IBSE) in Malaysia Science Curriculum, 7(2), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2685
Soobard, R., & Rannikmäe, M. (2011). Assessing Student’s Level of Scientific Literacy Using Interdisciplinary Scenarios. Science Education International, 22(2), 133–144. http://www.ut.ee/BG/miia_rannikmae/Publications/Assessing_Students_Level_of_Scientific_Literacy.pdf
Sulisworo, D., & Sutadi, N. (2017). Science Learning Cycle Method to Enhance the Conceptual Understanding and the Learning Independence on Physics Learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 6(1), 64–70.
Surpless, B., Bushey, M., & Halx, M. (2014). Developing Scientific Literacy in Introductory Laboratory Courses: A Model for Course Design and Assessment. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(2), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-073.1
Taasoobshirazi, G., & Sinatra, G. M. (2011). A Structural Equation Model of Conceptual Change in Physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 901–918. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20434
Taşlıdere, E. (2013). Effect of Conceptual Change Oriented Instruction on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Decreasing Their Misconceptions in DC Electric Circuits. Creative Education, 04(04), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.44041
Tsai, C. Y. (2015). Improving Students’ PISA Scientific Competencies Through Online Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.987712
Udompong, L., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Diagnosis of the Scientific Literacy Characteristics of Primary Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5091–5096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1079
Widodo, L., Parno., & Yuliati, L. (2018). Scientific Literacy Materi Fluida Statis Siswa SMA: Studi Kasus. JRKPF UAD, 5(1), 30–33.
Young, Hugh D., & Freedman Roger A. (2012). University Physics with Modern Physics. USA: Pearson Education, Inc
Young, D. E., & Meredith, D. C. (2017). Using the Resources Framework to Design, Assess, and Refine Interventions on Pressure in Fluids. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010125
Yumuşak, A., Maraş, İ., & Şahin, M. (2015). Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction with Conceptual Change Texts on Removing the Misconceptions of Radioactivity 1. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 3(2), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2015214277
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i8.12651
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Anissa Rakhma Putri, Lia Yuliati, Arif Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
