Email this article 
Analisis Penguasaan Konsep dan Kesulitan Siswa pada Materi Teori Kinetik Gas
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to analysed conceptual understanding and difficulties (misconceptions) of students in the kinetic theory of gases. Test consisted of 9 reasoned multiple choice questions administered after students study the material. From the results of the study, students get an average score of 7.1 from maximum score of 9. Students have mastered the concept of the relationship between ideal gas state quantities (pressure, volume, temperature) and kinetic energy of ideal gases. However, students still have difficulty in determining internal energy if the number of particles changing, the average speed of ideal gases, and the application of ideal gas law to the circulatory phenomena in the heart.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penguasaan konsep dan kesulitan (miskonsepsi) siswa pada materi teori kinetik gas. Soal tes terdiri dari sembilan soal pilihan ganda beralasan yang diberikan setelah siswa mempelajari materi tersebut. Dari hasil penelitian, siswa mendapatkan skor rata-rata 7,1 dari skor maksimal 9. Siswa telah menguasai konsep hubungan antar besaran keadaan gas ideal (tekanan, volume, suhu) dan energi kinetic gas ideal. Namun, siswa masih mengalami kesulitan dalam menentukan energi internal dengan jumlah partikel gas yang berubah, kelajuan rata-rata gas ideal, dan aplikasi persamaan keadaan gas pada fenomena peredaran darah di jantung.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alwan, A. A. (2011). Misconception of Heat and Temperature Among Physics Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.074
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Aksara.
Aydeniz, M., Pabuccu, A., Cetin, P. S., & Kaya, E. (2012). Argumentation and Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Properties and Behaviors of Gases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1303–1324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9336-1
Başer, M. (2006). Fostering Conceptual Change by Cognitive Conflict Based Instruction on Students’ Understanding of Heat and Temperature Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75458
Bouwma‐Gearhart, J., Stewart, J., & Brown, K. (2009). Student Misapplication of a Gas‐like Model to Explain Particle Movement in Heated Solids: Implications for Curriculum and Instruction Towards Students’ Creation and Revision of Accurate Explanatory Models. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1157–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902736325
Chang, H., Chen, J., Guo, C., Chen, C., Chang, C., Lin, S., Tseng, Y. (2007). Investigating Primary and Secondary Students’ Learning of Physics Concepts in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601073210
Cummings, K., Halliday, D., & Activity Based Physics Group (Eds.). (2004). Understanding Physics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Ding, L., & Beichner, R. (2009). Approaches to Data Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(2), 020103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020103
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Duit, R. (2009, March 23). Bibliography - STCSE Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education. Retrieved April 12, 2019, From Bibliography - STCSE Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education Website: http://archiv.ipn.uni-kiel.de/stcse/stcse.html
Husnaini, S. J., & Chen, S. (2019). Effects of Guided Inquiry Virtual and Physical Laboratories on Conceptual Understanding, Inquiry Performance, Scientific Inquiry Self-Efficacy, and Enjoyment. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010119
Jayanti, I. B. R., Wartono., & Sutopo. (2016). Dampak Program Resitasi terhadap Perubahan Konseptual Mahasiswa pada Topik Hukum III Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 256-264.
Kele, Ö., & Özsoy, S. (2009). Pre-Service Teachers’ Attitudes Toward use of Vee Diagrams in General Physics Laboratory. (3), 17.
Korganci, N., Miron, C., Dafinei, A., & Antohe, S. (2015). The Importance of Inquiry-Based Learning on Electric Circuit Models for Conceptual Understanding. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2463–2468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.530
Lin, S.-Y., & Singh, C. (2011). Using Isomorphic Problems to Learn Introductory Physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(2), 020104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020104
Meltzer, D. E. (2004). Investigation of Students’ Reasoning Regarding Heat, Work, and the First Law of Thermodynamics in an Introductory Calculus-Based General Physics Course. American Journal of Physics, 72(11), 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1789161
Monteyne, K., Gonzalez, B., & Loverude, M. (2008). An Interdisciplinary Study of Student Ability to Connect Particulate and Macroscopic Representations of a Gas. IP Conference Proceedings, 1064(1), 163–166.
Pollock, E. B., Thompson, J. R., Mountcastle, D. B., Hsu, L., Henderson, C., & McCullough, L. (2007). Student Understanding of the Physics and Mathematics of Process Variables in P-V Diagrams. AIP Conference Proceedings, 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2820924
Robertson, A. D., & Shaffer, P. S. (2013). University Student and K-12 Teacher Reasoning about the Basic Tenets of Kinetic-Molecular Theory, Part I: Volume of an Ideal Gas. American Journal of Physics, 81(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4775153
Robertson, A. D., & Shaffer, P. S. (2016). University Student Reasoning about the Basic Tenets of Kinetic-Molecular Theory, Part II: Pressure of an Ideal Gas. American Journal of Physics, 84(10), 795–809. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4960215
Russ, R. S., Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., & Hutchison, P. (2009). Making Classroom Assessment More Accountable to Scientific Reasoning: A Case for Attending to Mechanistic Thinking. Science Education, 93(5), 875–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20320
Sands, D. (2014). Concepts and Conceptual Understanding: What Are We Talking About? New Directions, 10(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.11120/ndir.2014.00030
Sari, A. L. R., Parno., & Taufiq, A. (2018). Pemahaman Konsep dan Kesulitan Siswa SMA pada Materi Hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(10), 1323-1330.
Sarıoğlan, A. B., & Küçüközer, H. (2014). The Effect of Meaning Making Instruction about Kepler’s Laws at High School students’ Conceptual Understanding. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 315–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.411
Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2008). Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
Talaeb, P., Wattanakasiwich, P., Paosawatyanyong, B., & Wattanakasiwich, P. (2010). Development of Thermodynamic Conceptual Evaluation. 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3479864
Turgut, Ü., Gürbüz, F., & Turgut, G. (2011). An Investigation 10th Grade Students’ Misconceptions about Electric Current. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1965–1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.036
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i10.12839
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Mimi Rohazal Yaumi, Sutopo Sutopo, Siti Zulaikah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
