Email this article 
Berpikir Pseudo Siswa pada Konsep Pecahan
Abstract
Abstract: Purpose of this research was to study students' pseudo thinking in concept of fractions. Data obtained using questions and interviews. Question used to find answers of students in understanding concept of fractions. Interviews used to find reasons for students answer. Findings show that students think pseudo conceptual, true-pseudo and false-pseudo. Pseudo conceptual thinking when students condition not understand shade when drawing fractions. Thinking true-pseudo when students in state not understand concept of drawing fractions begins with same size and broken down as much denominator fractions. Thinking false-pseudo when students state poor understanding problem and reflection for concept of drawing fractions.
Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ialah untuk mempelajari berpikir pseudo siswa dalam konsep pecahan. Data diperoleh dengan menggunakan instrumen soal dan wawancara. Soal digunakan untuk mengetahui jawaban siswa dalam memahami konsep pecahan. Wawancara digunakan untuk mengetahui alasan siswa dalam menjawab. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa siswa mengalami berpikir pseudo conceptual, true-pseudo dan false-pseudo. Berpikir pseudo conceptual saat siswa pada kondisi tidak memahami perlunya mengarsir saat menggambar pecahan. Berpikir true-pseudo saat siswa pada kondisi tidak memahami konsep menggambar pecahan berawal dari ukuran yang sama dan dipecah sebanyak penyebut pecahan. Berpikir false-pseudo saat siswa pada kondisi kurang memahami soal dan diperlukan refleksi konsep menggambar pecahan.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alamsyah, A., & Subanji. (2018). Proses Metakognisi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Open-Ended. Prosiding Silogisme, 1(1), 15–23.
Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 8(2), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v8i2.3554
Björklund, C., & Pramling, N. (2014). Pattern Discernment and Pseudo-Conceptual Development in Early Childhood Mathematics Education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 22(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2013.809657
Clarke, D., Roche, A., & Mitchell, A. (2011). One-to-One Student Interviews Provide Powerful Insights and Clear Focus for the Teaching of Fractions in the Middle Years. Fractions: Teaching for Understanding., 23–41.
DeWolf, M., Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (2015). Conceptual Structure and the Procedural Affordances of Rational Numbers: Relational Reasoning with Fractions and Decimals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000034
Fithriani, S. S., & Hidayanto, E. (2018). Elementary School Teachers’ Mathematical Connections in Solving Trigonometry Problem. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 3(3), 32–41.
Hayati, I. N., Subanji, & Qohar, A. (2016). Berpikir Pseudo Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah PISA. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(1), 10–15.
Holisin, I. (2009). Melatih Penalaran Siswa Sekolah Dasar Dalam Memahami Konsep Bilangan Pecahan dan Menyelesaikan Masalah Penjumlahan dan Pengurangan Bilangan Pecahan. Didaktis, 8(3), 20–33.
Iuculano, T., & Butterworth, B. (2011). Rapid Communication UnderstandingUnderstanding the Real Value of Fractions and Decimals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(11), 2088–2098. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.604785
Kurniawan, H., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., Susiswo, S., Setiawan, I., Sutawidjaja, A., Muksar, M. (2016). Limited Intervention at Sub Concept of Fractions in the Object Conversion into Fractions. International Education Studies, 9(7), 145. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n7p145
Kurniawan, H., Sutawidjaja, A., As’Ari, A. R., & Muksar, M. (2018). Characteristic of Student’s False Concessive Failure on Fractions Concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012173
Muhsetyo, G. (2014). Membandingkan Pecahan dengan Menggunakan Bahan Manipulatif Strip dan Menggunakan Benchmark.
Nur, F. (2009). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Berpikir Pseudo dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Kekontinuan Fungsi Linear yang Melibatkan Nilai Mutlak berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Mahasiswa. 69–91.
Permadi, W. E., & Irawan, E. B. (2016). Memahamkan Konsep Pecahan pada Siswa Kelas IV SDN Sumberejo 03 Kabupaten Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(9), 1735–1738.
Prayitno, L. L., Purwanto, P., Subanji, S., & Susiswo, S. (2018). Identification Errors of Problem Posed by Prospective Teachers about Fraction Based Meaning Structure. International Journal of Insights for Mathematics Teaching, 1(1), 76–84.
Puspendik. (2016). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, Result from TIMSS 2015. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, 1–2.
Rafiah, H., Saufi, M., Aulia, S., & Riadi, A. (2018). Berpikir Pseudo Mahasiswa PGSD pada Operasi Bilangan Bulat. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/http://jurnal.stkipbjm.ac.id/index.php/math
Sa’dijah, C., Afriyani, D., Subanji, Muksar, M., & Anwar, L. (2018). Assessing Students’ Pseudo-Mathematical Translation Using Translation-Verification Model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 20144, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054548
Sa’dijah, C., Rafiah, H., Gipayana, M., Qohar, A., & Anwar, L. (2018). Asesmen Pemecahan Masalah Open-Ended untuk Mengukur Profil Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Gender. Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan, 25(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.17977/um009v25i22016p147
Secolsky, C., Judd, T. P., Magaram, E., Levy, S. H., Kossar, B., & Reese, G. (2016). Using Think-Aloud Protocols to Uncover Misconceptions and Improve Developmental Math Instruction : An Exploratory Study. Numeracy, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.9.1.6
Strother, S., Brendefur, J. L., Thiede, K., & Appleton, S. (2016). Five Key Ideas to Teach Fractions and Decimals with Understanding. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(2), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.32.1832
Subanji. (2016a). Kerangka Dasar Berpikir Pseudo. Teori Berpikir Pseudo Penalaran Kovariasional, (October), 1–16. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309288042_Bab_1_kerangka_dasar_berpikir_pseudo
Subanji, S. (2016b). Berpikir Pseudo Penalaran Kovariasi dalam Mengonstruksi Grafik Fungsi Kejadian Dinamik : Sebuah Analisis Berdasarkan Kerangka Kerja VL2P dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran Matematika. (February). https://doi.org/10.17977/jip.v13i1.57
Subanji, S., & Nusantara, T. (2016). Thinking Process of Pseudo Construction in Mathematics Concepts. International Education Studies, 9(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n2p17
Subanji., & Maedi, S. A. (2015). The Pseudo-Covariational Reasoning Thought Processes in Constructing Graph Function of Reversible Event Dynamics Based on Assimilation and Accommodation Frameworks. Korean Society of Mathematical Education, 19(January), 61–79. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmed.2015.19.1.61
Subanji, & Nusantara, T. (2013). Karakterisasi Kesalahan Berpikir Siswa dalam Mengonstruksi Konsep Matematika. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 19(2), 208–217. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jip.v19i2.4215
Van De Walle, J. (2010). Developing Fraction Concepts. Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally, 286–308.
Van Steenbrugge, H., Remillard, J., Verschaffel, L., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2015). Teaching Fractions in Elementary School. The Elementary School Journal, 116(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1086/683111
Vinner, S. (1997). The Pseudo-Conceptual and the Pseudo-Analytical Thought Processes in Mathematics Learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(November), 97–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A
Wibawa, K. A. (2013). Defragmenting Berpikir Pseudo Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Limit. Seminar Nasional Exchange of Experiences Teacher Quality Improvement Program (TEQIP) 2013 “, 2(December 2015), 721–740.
Wibawa, K. A. (2016). Karakteristik Berpikir Pseudo Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Conference Problem Thinking Solving, (Conference Problem Thinking Solving View Paper Mathematics). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3907.3528
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i8.13041
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Agus Alamsyah, Susiswo Susiswo, Erry Hidayanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
