Elementary EFL Students’ Errors: How Does the Teacher Correct Students’ Errors?

Baiq Raudatul Jannah, Furaidah Furaidah, Sri Rachmajanti

Abstract


Abstract: Teacher’s corrective feedback on in English class has been studied many times in secondary or higher education level. However, how a teacher deliver corrective feedback in non-English subjects for students in elementary students rarely become the focus of studies. Therefore, this qualitative research studied the elementary students of International Class Program of SD Laboratorium UM. The second grader and the teachers contributed as the research subjects. There were five corrective feedback types used by the teacher, translation, first language, conversational recast, clarification, and explicit. Those feedbacks were considered as effective feedbacks since the students mostly responded to it.

Abstrak: Penelitian tentang feedback korektif guru seringkali diteliti di pendidikan menengah atau di tingkat perguruan tinggi. Namun, bagaimana guru menyampaikan feedback korektif untuk siswa sekolah dasar pada pelajaran non-bahasa Inggris sangat jarang dijadikan fokus penelitian. Maka dari itu, penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana guru memberikan korektif feedback pada siswa Program Kelas Internasional SD Laboratorium UM. Siswa kelas dua beserta gurunya menjadi subjek penelitian ini. Ada lima jenis feedback korektif yang diberikan guru, yaitu translation, first language, conversational recast, clarification, dan explicit. Feedback tersebut direspons oleh siswa.

Keywords


elementary efl students; corrective feedback;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alamis, M. M. P. (2010). Evaluating Students’ Reactions and Responses to Teachers’ Written Feedbacks. Philippine ESL Journal, Vol. 5, July

Barkley, E. F. 2010. Student Engagement Technique: A Handbook for College Faculty. United State of America: Jossey-Bass.

Campillo, J. M., Sánchez, R., & Miralles, P. (2019). Primary Teachers’ Perceptions of CLIL Implementation in Spain. English Language Teaching, 12(4), 149. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n4p149

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. University of Nebraska–Lincoln: Pearson Education Inc.

Dunlay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2005). Instructed Second Language Acquisition, A Literature Review: Report to the Ministry of Education. Ministry of Education.

Fadilah, A. E. (2016). EFL Students’ Preferences for Corrective Feedback in Speaking Class. Unpublished Thesis. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Gitshaki, C., & Althobaiti, N. (2010). ESL Teachers’ Use of Corrective Feedback and Its Effect on Learners’ Uptake. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(1), 197—219.

Hidayanti, W. R. (2015). Teacher’s and Students’ Questioning and Teacher’s Feedback in EFL Classroom. Unpublished Thesis. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Kavaliauskienė, G., & Anusienė, L. (2012). Case Study: Learner Attitudes Towards the Correction of Mistakes. Socialinės Technologijos Social Technologies, 2(1), 88–101.

Kirgoz, Y., & Agcam, R. (2015). Teachers’ Perceptions on Corrective Feedback in Turkish Primary Schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 574–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.096

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66 doi:10.1017/S0272263197001034

Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365

Madriñan, M. S. (2014). The Use of First Language in the Second-Language Classroom: A Support for Second Language Acquisition. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 9(9), 50–66.

Mahdi, D., & Saadany, N. E. (2013). Oral Feedback in the EFL Classroom. Unpublished Thesis. Malmo University.

Maolida, E. H. (2013). A Descriptive Study of Teacher’s Oral Feedback In an ESL Young Learner Classroom in Indonesia. K@Ta, 15(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.15.2.117-124

Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching: Second Edition. London: Sage Publication.

Mendez, E. H., & Cruz, M. R. R. (2012). Teachers’ Perceptions about Oral Corrective Feedback and Their Practice in EFL Classrooms. National University of Colombia.

Muhsin, A. (2016). The Effectiveness of Positive Feedback in Teaching Speaking Skill. Lingua Cultura, 10(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v10i1.873

Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573.

Park, H. S. (2010). Teachers’ and Learners’ Preferences for Error Correction. Unpublished Thesis. California State University.

Ramirez Verdugo, M. D. (2011). CLIL Varieties Across Europe. In Guidelines for CLIL Implementation in Primary and Pre-Primary Education.

Rifqi, M. S. (2016). EFL Teachers’ Belief about Spoken Corrective Feedback and Their Classroom Practice. Unpublished Thesis. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Safari, P. (2013). A Descriptive Study on Corrective Feedback and Learners’ Uptake during Interactions in a Communicative EFL Class. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(7), 1165—1175.

Surakka, K. (2007). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake in an EFL Classroom. Unpublished Thesis. University of Jyväskylä.

Suryoputro, G., & Amaliah, A. (2016). EFL Students’ Responses on Oral Corrective Feedbacks and Uptakes in Speaking Class. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(5).

Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. United State of America: The Guilford Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i4.13350

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Baiq Raudatul Jannah, Furaidah Furaidah, Sri Rachmajanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License