Email this article 
Pengaruh Pembelajaran Group Investigation dengan Multi Representasi pada Topik Alat-Alat Optik terhadap Penalaran Ilmiah dan Kemampuan Masalah Siswa SMA
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of group investigation learning model with multi representation on the topic of optical devices on scientific reasoning and problem solving skill. This study were carried out using quasi experimental method with pretest-posttest control group design and two XI MIA classes as sample. The result showed that there were an impact of group investigation learning model with multi representation on the topik of optical devices on scientific reasoning and problem solving skill of high school students. The mean value of scientific reasoning and problem solving ability of experimental class students who learned by group investigation learning model with multi representation is higher than control class students who learned by group investigation learning model.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh pembelajaran group investigation dengan multi representasi pada topik alat-alat optik terhadap kemampuan penalaran ilmiah dan kemampuan problem solving siswa SMA. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah eksperimen kuasi dengan desain pretest-posttest control group dengan dua kelas XI MIA sebagai sampel. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya pengaruh pembelajaran group investigation dengan multi representasi pada topik alat-alat optik terhadap kemampuan penalaran ilmiah dan pemecahan masalah siswa SMA. Nilai rerata penalaran ilmiah dan kemampuan problem solving siswa kelas eksperimen yang belajar menggunakan pembelajaran group investigation dengan multi representasi lebih tinggi dari siswa kelas kontrol yang belajar menggunakan pembelajaran group investigation.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adey, P. & Shayer, M. (1994). Really Raising Standards. London: Routledge.
Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to Learn in Science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097.
Andreou, C., & Raftopoulos, A. (2011). Lessons from the History of the Concept of the Ray for Teaching Geometrical Optics. Science & Education, 20(10), 1007–1037.
Azmitia, M., & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, Transactive Dialogues, and the Development of Scientific Reasoning. Social Development, 2(3), 202–221.
Buteler, L., & Coleoni, E. (2016). Solving Problems to Learn Concepts, How Does it Happen? A Case for Buoyancy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020144.
Cheng, S.-C., She, H.-C., & Huang, L. Y. (2017). The Impact of Problem-Solving Instruction on Middle School Students’ Physical Science Learning: Interplays of Knowledge, Reasoning, and Problem solving. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.
De Cock, M. (2012). Representation Use and Strategy Choice in Physics Problem Solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020117.
Djanette, B., & Fouad, C. (2014). Determination of University Students’ Misconceptions about Light Using Concept Maps. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 582–589.
Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. A., … Yang, J. (2016). Assessing student written problem solutions: A Problem-Solving Rubric with Application to Introductory Physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010130.
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119.
Fabby, C., & Koenig, K. (2015). Examining the Relationship of Scientific Reasoning with Physics Problem solving. 16(4), 7.
Fasching, J. L., & Erickson, B. L. (1985). Techniques for Teaching Scientific Reasoning and Problem solving. To Improve the Academy, 4(1), 195–202.
Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners’ Knowledge in Optics: Interpretation, Structure and Analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57–88.
Garrett, R., & Hong, G. (2016). Impacts of Grouping and Time on the Math Learning of Language Minority Kindergartners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 222–244.
Hammer, D. (2000). Student Resources for Learning Introductory Physics. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S52–S59.
Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. B. M., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. B., & Mohamad, M. M. B. (2011). The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills among Technical Education Students. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 121–125.
Istikomah, H., Hendratto, S., & Bambang, S. (2010). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation untuk Menumbuhkan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 6(1), 40-43.
Karplus, R., Adi, H., & Lawson, A. E. (1980). Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School VIII: Proportional, Probabilistic, and Correlational Reasoning. School Science and Mathematics, 80(8), 673–683.
Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. (2017). Understanding and Promoting Effective Use of Representations in Physics Learning. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & H. E. Fischer (Eds.), Multiple Representations in Physics Education (Vol. 10, pp. 231–254).
Kosasih, K. (2014). Strategi Belajar dan Pembelajaran Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
Kozma, R. (2003). The Material Features of Multiple Representations and Their Cognitive and Social Affordances for Science Understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205–226.
Lazarowitz, R., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Baird, J. H. (1994). Learning Science in a Cooperative Setting: Academic Achievement and Affective Outcomes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1121–1131.
Lee, C.-Q., & She, H.-C. (2010). Facilitating Students’ Conceptual Change and Scientific Reasoning Involving the Unit of Combustion. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 479–504.
Masters, M. F., & Grove, T. T. (2010). Active Learning in Intermediate Optics Through Concept Building Laboratories. American Journal of Physics, 78(5), 485–491.
Ouattara, F., & Boudaoné, B. (2012). Teaching and Learning in Geometrical Optics in Burkina Faso Third form Classes: Presentation and Analysis of Class Observations Data and Students’ Performance. British Journal of Science, 5 (1).
Serway, R. A., Vuille, C., & Faughn, J. S. (2008). College Physics: Eight Edition. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1990). Group Investigation Expands Cooperative Learning. Educational Leadership, 6.
Susilowati, S. M. E., & Anam, K. (2017). Improving Students’ Scientific Reasoning and Problem-Solving Skills by The 5E Learning Model. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 9(3), 506.
Tan, I. G. C., Sharan, S., & Lee, C. K. E. (2007). Group Investigation Effects on Achievement, Motivation, and Perceptions of Students in Singapore. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(3), 142–154.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2006). Learning Junior Secondary Science through Multi-Modal Representations. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11.
Wegerif, R. (2002). Literature Review in Thinking Skills, Technology and Learning. 49.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i4.13360
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Apolonia Delviyanti Putri Marga, Edi Supriana, Arif Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
