Email this article 
Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Kimia Materi Hidrolisis Garam dengan Pendekatan Scientific Inquiry Berbasis Problem Based Learning
Abstract
Abstract: This development research aims to produce chemical teaching material products with a problem-based scientific inquiry approach based on the 4-D (four-D) model of Thiagarajan, Semmel and Semmel with the stages of define, design, develop, disseminate through a cross-sectional survey. The method used in the survey at the define stage is through literature review of chemistry textbooks. The results of the development of chemistry teaching materials salt hydrolysis material are empirically validated by content experts and chemistry learning material experts are considered valid with an average score of 3.67 and suitable for use as teaching materials.
Abstrak: Penelitian pengembangan ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan produk bahan ajar kimia dengan pendekatan scientific inquiry berbasis problem based learning model 4-D (four-D) Thiagarajan, Semmel dan Semmel dengan tahapan define, design, develop, disseminate melalui survey cross secsional. Metode yang digunakan dalam survei pada tahap define melalui kajian literatur buku teks pelajaran kimia. Hasil pengembangan bahan ajar kimia materi hidrolisis garam tervalidasi secara empirik oleh ahli isi dan ahli materi pembelajaran kimia dinilai valid dengan skor rata-rata 3,67 dan layak digunakan sebagai bahan ajar.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adlim, M., S, S., Ali, H., Ibrahim, A., Umar, H., Ismail, K., Gani, U. A., Hasan, I., & Yasin, B. (2014). Assessing Chemistry-Learning Competencies of Students in Isolated Rural Senior High Schools By Using the National Examination: A Case Study of Simeulue Island, Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 817–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9440-x
Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D., & Zuiker, S. (2007). Relating Narrative, Inquiry, and Inscriptions: Supporting Consequential Play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9033-3
Borda, E., Boudreaux, A., Fackler-Adams, B., Frazey, P., Julin, S., Pennington, G., & Ogle, J. (2017). Adapting a Student-Centered Chemistry Curriculum to a Large-Enrollment Context: Successes and Challenges. Journal of College Science Teaching, 046(05), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_046_05_8
Burgess, A., Roberts, C., Ayton, T., & Mellis, C. (2018). Implementation of Modified Team-Based Learning within a Problem Based Learning Medical Curriculum: A Focus Group Study. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1172-8
Buxner, S. R. (2015). Exploring How Research Experiences For Teachers Changes Their Understandings of The Nature of Science And Scientific Inquiry. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education (JAESE), 1(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.19030/jaese.v1i1.9107
Çalik, M., Özsevgeç, T., Ebenezer, J., Artun, H., & Küçük, Z. (2014). Effects of “Environmental Chemistry” Elective Course Via Technology-Embedded Scientific Inquiry Model on Some Variables. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9473-5
Ceylan, S., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Improving a Sample Lesson Plan for Secondary Science Courses within the STEM Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177(July 2014), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.395
Cooper, M. M., & Stieff, M. (2017). Sketching the Invisible to Predict the Visible : From Drawing to Modeling in Chemistry. 9, 902–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12285
Drăghicescu, L. M., Petrescu, A. M., Cristea, G. C., Gorghiu, L. M., & Gorghiu, G. (2014). Application of Problem-based Learning Strategy in Science Lessons – Examples of Good Practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.245
Gültepe, N. (2016). Reflections on High School Students’ Graphing Skills and their Conceptual Understanding of Drawing Chemistry Graphs. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 16(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.1.2837
IGCSE Cambridge. (2015). Syllabus Cambridge Secondary 2 Version 1. August. http://www.cie.org.uk/images/167037-2016-2018-syllabus.pdf
Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Chang, C. H. (2011). To Aggregate or Not to Aggregate: Steps for Developing and Validating Higher-Order Multidimensional Constructs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9238-1
Kazeni, M., Baloyi, E., & Gaigher, E. (2018). Effectiveness of Individual and Group Investigations in Developing Integrated Science Inquiry Skills. South African Journal of Education, 38(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n3a1549
Knaus, K., Murphy, K., Blecking, A., & Holme, T. (2011). A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Cognitive Complexity Rating Assignment of Chemistry Exam Items. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(5), 554–560. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed900070y
Koçakoǧlu, M., Bakar, E., & Keleş, Ö. (2010). The Comparision of the Science and Technology Curriculum with the Physics, Chemistry and Biology Curriculums. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.011
Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014a). Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Understandings about Scientific Inquiry - The Views about Scientific Inquiry (VASI) Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21125
Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014b). Meaningful Assessment of Learners ’ Understandings about Scientific Inquiry — The Views About Scientific Inquiry ( VASI ) Questionnaire. 51(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21125
Naah, B. M., & Sanger, M. J. (2013). Investigating Students’ Understanding of the Dissolving Process. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9379-7
Osman, K., Hiong, L. C., & Vebrianto, R. (2013). 21st Century Biology: An Interdisciplinary Approach of Biology, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102(Ifee 2012), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.732
Rahayu, S., Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., Kita, M., & Ibnu, S. (2011). Understanding Acid-Base Concepts: Evaluating the Efficacy of a Senior High School Student-Centred Instructional Program in Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1439–1458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9272-x
Rahayu, S., & Kita, M. (2010). An Analysis of Indonesian and Japanese Students’ Understandings of Macroscopic and Submicroscopic Levels of Representing Matter and its Changes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(4), 667–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9180-0
Saukkoriipi, J., & Laasonen, K. (2010). Theoretical Study of the Hydrolysis of Pentameric Aluminum Complexes. In Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (Vol. 6, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1021/ct900670a
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a Learning Progression for Scientific Modeling: Making Scientific Modeling Accessible and Meaningful for Learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
Şener, N., & Tü, C. (2015). Improving Science Attitude and Creative Thinking through Science Education Project : A Design , Implementation, and Assessment. 3(4), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i4.771
Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The Use of Scientific Literacy Taxonomy for Assessing the Development of Chemical Literacy among High-School Students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90011A
Stone, E. M. (2014). Guiding Students to Develop an Understanding of Scientific Inquiry: A Science Skills Approach to Instruction and Assessment. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe-12-11-0198
Susianna, N. (2011). The Chemistry Teaching Program for Developing the Senior High School Students’ Entrepreneurial Attitudes. Online Submission, 7, 909–923.
Tang, X., Coffey, J. E., Elby, A., & Levin, D. M. (2010). The Scientific Method and Scientific Inquiry: Tensions in Teaching and Learning. Science Education, 94(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20366.
Ültay, N. (2016). A Comparison of Different Teaching Designs of ‘ Acids and Bases ’ Subject. 12(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1422a
Wang, L., Zhang, R., Clarke, D., & Wang, W. (2014). Enactment of Scientific Inquiry: Observation of Two Cases at Different Grade Levels in China Mainland. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(2), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9486-0
Wijayati, N. (2017). International Journal of Active Learning Application of Project Based Learning (PBL) Model for Materials of Salt Hydrolysis to Encourage Students ’ Entrepreneurship Behaviour, 2(1), 50–58.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i7.13778
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 wiji chusnah, Suhadi Ibnu, Sutrisno Sutrisno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
