Integrated Academic Writing Assessment Model to Support The Implementation of OBE Curriculum

Hamamah Hamamah, Yulia Hapsari, Ive Emaliana, Putu Dian Danayanti Degeng

Abstract


Abstract: Implementation of outcome-based Education (OBE) in Indonesia has been urged since 2019. It primes to the need of some adjustments in the higher education curriculum. In Academic writing classes in which English is served as a foreign language, implementation of OBE principles imposes issues as assessment must measure all abilities, skills, and knowledge targeted in the learning outcomes. The challenge escalate with large size classes that lead to a less optimum assessment given to learners’ writing. The need of writing assessment model that obeys OBE principles and facilitates academic writing teachers in coping with complication in providing quality assessment to scads of students in Indonesia is of a paramount importance. Yet, studies aimed at meeting the need are barely conducted. This research, therefore, designs writing assessment model which can (1) measure the expected learning outcomes, (2) monitor student’s abilities, skills and knowledge with regard to their individual learning pace, (3) assist the teachers of writing classes to comprehensively provide rigorous assessment to lots of students. ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) model is employed to reach the research objectives. As the whole process is still on going, this article presents the Analysis and Design stages of the study. It elaborates underlying considerations of the proposed assessment model by reviewing previous studies related to writing assessment and OBE assessment in writing. The descriptions of the illustrated assessment model are presented to provide vivid view of how the assessment model works.

Abstrak: Implementasi Pendidikan Berbasis Hasil (OBE) di Indonesia telah digalakkan sejak tahun 2019. Hal tersebut didorong oleh perlunya beberapa penyesuaian dalam kurikulum pendidikan tinggi. Dalam kelas menulis akademik dimana bahasa Inggris disajikan sebagai bahasa asing, penerapan prinsip-prinsip OBE memberlakukan masalah karena penilaian harus mengukur semua kemampuan, keterampilan, dan pengetahuan yang ditargetkan dalam hasil pembelajaran. Tantangan meningkat dengan kelas berukuran besar yang mengarah pada penilaian yang kurang optimal yang diberikan pada hasil tulisan peserta didik. Perlunya model asesmen menulis yang menganut prinsip OBE dan memfasilitasi guru kepenulisan akademik dalam menghadapi kesulitan dalam memberikan asesmen berkualitas kepada siswa di Indonesia menjadi sangat penting. Namun, studi yang ditujukan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan tersebut hampir tidak pernah dilakukan. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merancang model penilaian menulis (1) mengukur hasil belajar yang diharapkan, (2) memantau kemampuan, keterampilan dan pengetahuan siswa terkait dengan kecepatan belajar individu mereka, (3) membantu guru kelas menulis untuk memberikan penilaian yang cermat secara komprehensif kepada siswa. banyak siswa. Model ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) digunakan untuk mencapai tujuan penelitian ini. Karena keseluruhan proses masih berlangsung, artikel ini menyajikan tahapan Analisis dan Desain dari studi tersebut. Tulisan ini menguraikan pertimbangan yang mendasari model penilaian yang diusulkan dengan meninjau penelitian sebelumnya terkait dengan penilaian menulis dan penilaian OBE secara tertulis. Deskripsi model asesmen bergambar disajikan untuk memberikan gambaran yang jelas tentang cara kerja model asesmen.


Keywords


Academic Writing Assessment model; outcome-based Education (OBE);ADDIE; learning outcomes; student’s abilities;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akir, O., Eng, T. H., & Malie, S. (2012). Teaching and Learning Enhancement Through Outcome-Based Education Structure and Technology e-Learning Support. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.015

Allen, D., & Katayama, A. (2016). Relative Second Language Proficiency and the Giving and Receiving of Written Peer Feedback. System, 56, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.12.002

Ariyanti, A., & Fitriana, R. (2017). EFL Students’ Difficulties and Needs in Essay Writing. 158(Ictte), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-17.2017.4

Banegas, D. L. (2019). Language Curriculum Transformation and Motivation Through Action Research. Curriculum Journal, 30(4), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1646145

Branch, R. M. (2009). Approach, Instructional Design: The ADDIE. In Statistical Field Theor (Vol. 53, Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Crespo, R. M., Najjar, J., Derntl, M., Leony, D., Neumann, S., Oberhuemer, P., Totschnig, M., Simon, B., Gutiérrez, I., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2010). Aligning Assessment with Learning Outcomes in Outcome-Based Education. 2010 IEEE Education Engineering Conference, EDUCON 2010, 1239–1246. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492385

Ghalib, T. K., & Al-Hattami, A. A. (2015). Holistic Versus Analytic Evaluation of EFL Writing: A Case Study. English Language Teaching, 8(7), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n7p225

Gupta, S., & Dutta, P. K. (2020). Topic Objective and Outcome: Performance Indicators in Knowledge Transfer Through in-Depth Curriculum Content Analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 172(2019), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.053

Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding Principles for Effective Peer Response. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci004

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hawe, E., Dixon, H., & Watson, E. (2008). Oral Feedback in the Context of Written Language. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(1), 43–58.

Hawe, E., & Parr, J. (2013). Assessment for Learning in the Writing Classroom: An Incomplete Realisation. Curriculum Journal, 25(2), 210–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.862172

Huizinga, T., Handelzalts, A., Nieveen, N., & Voogt, J. M. (2014). Teacher Involvement in Curriculum Design: Need for Support to Enhance Teachers’ Design Expertise. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.834077

Karim, N. A.-H. A. K., & Yin, K. Y. (2013). Outcome-Based Education: An Approach for Teaching and Learning Development. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 3(1), 26–35.

Keen, J. (2010). Strategic Revisions in the Writing of Year 7 Students in the UK. Curriculum Journal, 21(3), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2010.504574

Li, X. (2008). Cognitive Transfer and English writing. English Language Teaching, 1(1), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v1n1p113

Malan, S. (2000). The “New Paradigm” of Outcomes-Based Education in Perspective. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences /Tydskrif Vir Gesinsekologie En Verbruikerswetenskappe, 28(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfecs.v28i1.52788

Nabhan, S. (2016). The Process Approach to Improve Students’ Writing Ability In The Process Approach to Improve Students’ Writing Ability In English Education Department University of PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya. Jembatan Merah Jurnal Pengajaran Bahasa Dan Sastra, 13(June 2016), 0–15.

O’Brien, J. (2015). Consciousness-raising, Error Correction and Proofreading. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(3), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i3.13284

Obeid, R. (2017). Second Language Writing and Assessment: Voices from Within the Saudi EFL Context. English Language Teaching, 10(6), 174. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n6p174

Ruecker, T., Shapiro, S., Johnson, E. N., & Tardy, C. M. (2014). Exploring the Linguistic and Institutional Contexts of Writing Instruction in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.165

Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative Assessment: Revisiting the territory. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050104

Spady, William, G. (1994). Available from. The American Association of School Administrators.

Timperley, H. S., & Parr, J. M. (2009). What Is This Lesson About? Instructional Processes and Student Understandings in Writing Classrooms. Curriculum Journal, 20(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170902763999

Tsui, A. M. Y. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments ? 9(2).

White, E. (2009). Are You Assessment Literate? Some Fundamental Questions Regarding Effective Classroom-Based Assessment. OnCUE Journal, 3(1), 3–25. http://jaltcue-sig.org/files/OnCUE/OCJ3-1articles/OCJ3-1-White-pp3-25.pdf

Willis, S., & Kissane, B. (1995). Outcome-Based Education a Review of the Literature. In Education Department of Western Australia (Vol. 1, Issue 3).

Yustiana, D. (2015). Penilaian Otomatis Terhadap Jawaban Esai Pada Soal Berbahasa Indonesia Menggunakan Latent Semantic Analysis. Seminar Nasional “Inovasi Dalam Desain dan Teknologi” - IDeaTech 2015, 123–130.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i7.13827

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Hamamah Hamamah, Yulia Hapsari, Ive Emaliana, Putu Dian Danayanti Degeng

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License