Korelasi Pengetahuan Metakognitif dan Kemampuan Problem Solving Siswa pada Topik Larutan Penyangga dengan Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning dan Verifikasi
Abstract
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui korelasi pengetahuan metakognitif dan kemampuan problem solving siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) dan verifikasi pada materi larutan penyangga. Penelitian ini menggunakan instrumen tes di akhir pembelajaran. Sampel penelitiannya dilakukan pada dua kelas penelitian di SMAN 1 Karangrejo Tulungagung. Instrumen tes yang digunakan terdiri dari dua jenis tes dengan topik materi larutan penyangga dalam kategori pengetahuan metakognitif dan kemampuan problem solving dengan nilai reliabilitas instrumen dengan cronbach alpha 0,779 dan 0,728 dengan kategori tinggi. Hasil uji Pearson product-moment correlation pada data penelitian menunjukkan adanya korelasi yang kuat antara pengetahuan metakognitif dan kemampuan problem solving dengan (rhitung=+0.954) dengan komponen metakognitif yang paling berpengaruh yaitu pengetahuan kondisional (rhitung=+0.802).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming Science Teaching: What Research says about Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
BouJaoude, S., Salloum, S., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2004). Relationships between Selective Cognitive Variables and Students’ Ability to Solve Chemistry Problems. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 63–84.
Bryce, D., & Whitebread, D. (2012). The Development of Metacognitive Skills: Evidence from Observational Analysis of Young Children’s Behavior During Problem-Solving. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 197-217.
Carlson, M., & Bloom, I. (2005). The Cyclic Nature of Problem Solving: An Emergent Multidimensional Problem-Solving Framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 45–75.
Cook, E., Kennedy, E., & McGuire, S. Y. (2013). Effect of Teaching Metacognitive Learning Strategies on Performance in General Chemistry Courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(2), 961–967.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. In Educational Research (Vol. 4).
Eberlein, T., Kampmeier, J., Minderhout, V., Moog, R. S., Platt, T., Varma-Nelson, P., & White, H. B. (2008). Pedagogies of engagement in science: A Comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(4), 262–273.
Gabel, D. L. (1993). Use of the Particle Nature of Matter in Developing Conceptual Understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 193.
Hanson M. D. (2006). Instructor’s Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning. Pacific Crest, 1–60.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is Science Difficult to Learn? Things Are Seldom What They Seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75-83.
Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of Chemistry - Logical or Psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 9–15.
Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). Metacognition in Chemical Education: Question Posing in the Case-Based Computerized Learning Environment. Instructional Science, 37(5), 403–436.
Karadan, M., & Hameed, A. D. (2016). Exploring the Features of Metacognition and Achievement Goals in Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Instruction (POGIL). International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR), 5(3), 39–43.
Kipnis, M., & Hofstein, A. (2008). The Inquiry Laboratory as a Source for Development of Metacognitive Skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 601–627.
Magno, C. (2010). The Role of Metacognitive Skills in Developing Critical Thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 137–156.
Majid, A., Amir, M., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). Misconception Identification of Buffer Solution Concept and Students’ Learning Style. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 8(2), 47–54.
Mutlu, A., & Şeşen, B. A. (2016). Evaluating of Preservice Science Teachers’ Understanding DF General Chemistry Concepts by Using Twe Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 79–96.
Noh, T., Jeon, K., & Huffman, D. (2005). The Effects of Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving on High School Students’ Chemistry Problem-Solving Performance and Verbal Interactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(10), 1558.
Orgill, M., & Sutherland, A. (2008). Undergraduate Chemistry Students’ Perceptions of and Misconceptions about Buffers and Buffer Problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(2), 131.
Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (2000). The Role of Metacognition in Learning Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 915.
Sesen, B. A., & Tarhan, L. (2011). Active-Learning versus Teacher-Centered Instruction for Learning Acids and Bases. Research in Science and Technological Education, 29(2), 205–226.
Thomas, G. P., & Anderson, D. (2014). Changing the Metacognitive Orientation of a Classroom Environment to Enhance Students’ Metacognition Regarding Chemistry Learning. Learning Environments Research, 17(1), 139–155.
Woods, D. R. (1987). How Might Teach Problem Solving? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987(30), 55–71.
Zohar, A., & David, A. Ben. (2008). Explicit Teaching of Meta-Strategic Knowledge in Authentic Classroom Situations. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 59–82.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i9.13977
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Ahmad Gilang Indra Salam, Effendy Effendy, Nazriati Nazriati
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License |