Email this article 
The Analysis of Proceeding Papers’ Coherence through Thematic Progression Manifestation
Abstract
Abstract: Twenty research papers published in international conference proceedings are analyzed in terms of its thematic progression manifestation to know the coherence built within the papers. The analysis obtained that among the three thematic progression manifest, zig-zag pattern is the most frequent pattern manifest by 388 patterns, followed by theme reiteration by 317 patterns and multiple rheme by only 8 patterns. This indicates that although the writers are lack of information regarding thematic progression, their unconscious manifestation of thematic progression allows the coherence built within the text, making the readers able to comprehend and understand the papers easily.
Abstrak: Sebanyak 20 artikel yang telah publikasi di prosiding konferensi internasional dianalisis berdasarkan manifestasi Pola Great Tema untuk mengetahui koherensi yang dikembangkan dalam artikel. Diketahui berdasarkan analisis tersebut, dari tiga Pola Gerak Tema yang dimanifestasi, pola zig-zag adalah yang banyak dengan 388 pola, diikuti dengan theme reiteration dengan 317 pola, dan pola multiple-rheme dengan 8 pola. Hasil ini mengindikasikan bahwa, walaupun penulis kurang mendapatkan informasi mengenai Pola Gerak Tema, namun mereka dapat menggunakan Pola Gerak Tema tersebut secara tidak sadar sehingga koherensi dalam artikel terbentuk, dan pembaca dapat mengerti isi artikel tersebut.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Belmonte, I. A., & McCabe, A. (1998). Theme-Rheme Patterns in L2 Writing. Diddactica, 10, 13–31.
Cheng, X. T. (2002). Cohesion and Coherence in English Compositions. Journal of School of Foreign Languages Shandong Teachers’ University, 2(11), 94–98.
Danes, F. (1974). Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text. Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, 23, 106–128.
Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd ed). Continuum.
Fahy, K. (2008). Writing for Publication: Argument and Evidence. Women and Birth, 21(3), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2008.04.001
Hawes, T. (2015). Thematic Progression in the Writing of Students and Professionals. Ampersand, 2(C), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002
Lisée, C., Larivière, V., & Archambault, É. (2008). Conference Proceedings as a Source of Scientific Information: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1776–1784. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20888
Ma, J. (2001). Thematic Progression, Cohesive Devices and Coherence in English Writing—Analysis of CET-4 and CET-6 Writing Papers. Foreign Language Education Journal, 22(5), 45–50.
Mellos, V. D. (2011). Coherence in English as A Second Language, Undergraduate Writing, A Theme-Rheme Analysis. Unpublished Thesis. San Diego State University.
Morgan, G. A., Gliner, J. A., & Harmon, R. J. (1999). Definition, Purposes, and Dimensions of Research. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(2), 217–219. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199902000-00023
Ping, A. L. (2007). Developing the Message: Thematic Progression and Student Writing. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(3), 93–127.
Rakhman, A. N. (2013). An Analysis of Thematic Progression in High School Students’ Exposition Texts. Passage, 3(1), 65–74.
Rustipa, K. (2010). Theme-Rheme Organization of Learners’ Texts. Dinamika Bahasa dan Budaya: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Bahasa dan Budaya, 4(2), 1-17.
Straub, D. W., Ang, S., & Evaristo, R. (1994). Normative Standards for IS Research. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 25(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/188423.188429
Taboada, M. T. (2004). Building Coherence and Cohesion: Task-Oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish. Benjamins.
Wang, L. (2007). Theme and Rheme in the Thematic Organization of Text: Implications for Teaching Academic Writing. ASIAN EFL Journal Quarterly, 9(1), 164–176.
Zhang, Y. (2004). Thematic Progression and Coherence in Writing. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 2, 47–50.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14163
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Imroati Istibsyaroh Ar Ruhimat, Yazid Basthomi, Anik Nunuk Wulyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
