Email this article 
Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Laju Reaksi dan Perbaikannya Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E dengan Strategi Konflik Kognitif
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims are to find out the types of students’ misconceptions on the topic of reaction rate, to know the effectiveness of a remedy in Learning Cycle 5E (LC 5E) models with cognitive conflict strategies and to know the retention of students' understanding, 3 weeks after the remedy. The research subjects were 31 students of XI IPA in a high school situated in Batu. The research instruments in the form of three-tier multiple choices diagnostic test consisting of 21 questions with a content validity of 98.04% and a reliability of 0.866 and a set of a remedy learning. The results showed that 14 types of misconceptions were found on an average of 23.75% research subjects. The remedy learning in LC 5E with cognitive conflict strategies was able to reduce the students’ misconceptions to an average of 9.68% only, and 3 weeks after the remedy, the retention of students’ understanding was still 91.44% with excellent criteria.
Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui jenis-jenis miskonsepsi yang dialami siswa pada topik laju reaksi, mengetahui efektifitas pembelajaran remidi model Learning Cycle 5E (LC 5E) dengan strategi konflik kognitif dalam memperbaiki miskonsepsi dan mengetahui retensi pemahaman siswa tiga minggu setelah remidi. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 31 siswa kelas XI IPA Kota Batu. Alat penelitian ini mengadopsi bentuk tes diagnostik tiga tingkat pilihan ganda berjumlah 21 soal dengan validitas isi 98,04%, reliabilitas 0,866, serta seperangkat pembelajaran remidi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa telah ditemukan 14 jenis miskonsepsi yang rerata dialami oleh 23,75 % subjek penelitian, pembelajaran remidi LC 5E dengan strategi konflik kognitif mampu mengurangi miskonsepsi siswa menjadi rerata 9,68% saja, dan 3 minggu setelah remidi, retensi pemahaman siswa masih sebesar 91,44 % dengan kriteria sangat baik.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahiakwo, M. J., & Isiguzo, C. Q. (2015). Students’ Conceptions and Misconceptions in Chemical Kinetics in Port Harcourt Metropolis of Nigeria. African Journal of Chemical Education, 5(2), 112-130.
Alabdulkareem, S. A. (2017). Saudi Science Teachers ’ Perceptions of Implementing Inquiry in Science Class. 5(12), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i12.2741
Artayasa, I. P., Susilo, H., Lestari, U., & Indriwati, S. E. (2018). The Effect of Three Levels of Inquiry on the Improvement of Science Concept Understanding of Elementary School Teacher Candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11216a
Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E., & Eliovitch, R. (1990). Applying the “Cognitive Conflict” Strategy for Conceptual Change—Some Implications, Difficulties, and Problems. Science Education, 74(5), 555-569.
Indriani, A., Suryadharma, I. B., & Yahmin, Y. (2017). Identifikasi Kesulitan Peserta Didik dalam Memahami Kesetimbangan Kimia. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 2(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v2i12017p009
Norjana, R., & Joharmawan, R. (2016). Identifikasi Tingkat Pemahaman Konsep Hukum-Hukum Dasar Kimia dan Penerapannya dalam Stoikiometri pada Siswa Kelas X IPA di MAN 3 Malang. J-Pek (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 01(2), 42–49.
Palisoa, N., Agustini, R., & Prahani, B. K. (2017). Integration of Strategy Conceptual Change Using Strategy 3R (Recall , Recognition and Redintegration) to Reduce Burden High Misconceptions. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(3), 37–44.
Pathare, S. R., & Pradhan, H. C. (2010). Students’ Misconceptions about Heat Transfer Mechanisms and Elementary Kinetic Theory. Physics Education, 45(6), 629. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/45/6/008
Pesman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a Three-Tier Test to Assess Misconceptions about Simple Electric Circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002
Prodjosantoso, A. K., Hertina, A. M., & Irwanto. (2019). The Misconception Diagnosis on Ionic and Covalent Bonds Concepts with Three Tier Diagnostic Test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477–1488. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12194a
Sen, S. (2017). The Effects of 5E Inquiry Learning Activities on Achievement and Attitude The Effects of 5E Inquiry Learning Activities on Achievement and Attitude toward Chemistry. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p1
Treagust, D. F., & Centre, M. E. (2001). Diagnostic Assessment in Science as a Means to Improving Teaching, Learning and Retention. Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education, 1-9.
Vlassi, M., & Karaliota, A. (2013). The Comparison between Guided Inquiry and Traditional Teaching Method. A Case Study for the Teaching of the Structure of Matter to 8th Grade Greek Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 494–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.226
Zuhroti, B., Marfu’ah, S., & Ibnu, M. S. (2018). Identifikasi Pemahaman Konsep Tingkat Representasi Makroskopik, Mikrokopik dan Simbolik Siswa pada Materi Asam-Basa. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 3(2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.17977/¬um026v3i22018p044
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i6.14876
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Linda Ayu Lestari, Subandi Subandi, Habiddin Habiddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
