Email this article 
Identifikasi Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Topik Gelombang Bunyi dan Cahaya
Abstract
Abstract: Scientific argumentation helps develop the skills needed in the 21st century, namely the ability to think critically and communicate effectively. The identification of the ability to argue scientifically can be a guide in developing learning. This research is a descriptive study that aims to describe the phenomenon of students' scientific arguments about the material of sound and light waves. This study involved 88 class XII students of SMA Negeri 1 Putussibau for the academic year 2020/2021 as research subjects. The instrument used in the form of 3 essay questions is the Scientific Argumentation Ability Test with a reliability of 0.622. Students' answers were analyzed based on the Toulmin Argumentation Pattern (TAP) level of argumentation. The results showed that the scientific argumentation of students on the topic of waves was still low, with the average level of student ability at levels 1 and 2. It was necessary to make efforts to improve students' scientific arguments, one of which was the application of the Argument Driven Inquiry learning model.
Abstrak: Argumentasi ilmiah membantu pengembangan kemampuan yang diperlukan di abad-21, yaitu kemampuan berpikir kritis dan berkomunikasi efektif. Adanya indentifikasi kemampuan berargumentasi ilmiah dapat menjadi panduan dalam mengembangan pembelajaran. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif yang bertujuan mengambarkan fenomena argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi gelombang bunyi dan cahaya. Penelitian ini melibatkan 88 siswa kelas XII SMA Negeri 1 Putussibau tahun ajaran 2020/2021 sebagai subyek penelitian. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa 3 butir soal esay Tes Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah dengan reliabilitas 0,622. Jawaban siswa dianalisis berdasarkan level argumentasi Toulmin Argumentation Pattern (TAP). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa agumentasi ilmiah siswa pada topik gelombang masih rendah dengan level kemampuan siswa rata-rata berada pada level 1 dan 2. Perlu adanya upaya yang dilakukan untuk meningkatkan argumentasi ilmiah siswa salah satunya melalui penerapan model pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ain, T. N., Wibowo, H. A. C., Rohman, A., & Deta, U. A. (2018, March). The Scientific Argumentation Profile of Physics Teacher Candidate in Surabaya. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997(1), 012025. IOP Publishing.
Amelia, R., Budiasih, E., & Yahmin. (2020). Promoting the scientific argumentation skills of students using ADI-S and ADI models in chemical kinetics teaching. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2215, No. 1, p. 020001). AIP Publishing LLC.
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for Scientific Argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68–94.
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom Communities’ Adaptations of The Practice of Scientific Argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191–216.
Budiyono, A., Rusdiana, D., & Kholida, S. I. (2015). Pembelajaran Argument Based Science Inquiry (ABSI) Pada Fisika. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Sains, 8, 205–208.
Council, N. R. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academies Press.
Eliana, D., & Admoko, S. (2020). Tren Pembelajaran Argumentasi Berbasis Toulmins Argument Pattern (TAP) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi dan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2).
Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2018). A Critical Review of Scientific Argumentation in Science Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80353
Fakhriyah, F., Rusilowati, A., Wiyanto, W., & Susilaningsih, E. (2021). Argument-Driven Inquiry Learning Model: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 767–784. https://doi.org/10.¬46328/¬ijres.2001
Fatmah, S. N., Mastuang, M., & Salam, A. (2019). Pembelajaran Berbasis Learner Autonomy Topik Gelombang Cahaya untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Proses Sains. Vidya Karya, 33(2), 154-162.
Hand, B., Nam, J., & Choi, A. (2012). Argument-Based General Chemistry Laboratory Investigations for Pre-Service Science Teachers. Educación Química, 23, 96–100.
Hidayat, S. R., Setyadin, A. H., Hermawan, H., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Siahaan, P., & Samsudin, A. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah pada Materi Getaran, Gelombang, dan Bunyi. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 157–166.
Hong, L. Y., & Abdul Talib, C. (2018). Scientific Argumentation in Chemistry Education: Implication and Suggestions. Asian Social ScienceI, 14(11), 14–29.
Inthaud, K., Bongkotphet, T., & Chindaruksa, S. (2019). Argument-Driven Inquiry Instruction to Facilitate Scientific Reasoning of 11th Grade Students in Light and Visual Instrument Topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 32014.
Jumadin, L., Hidayat, A., & Sutopo, S. (2017). Perlunya Pembelajaran Modelling Instruction pada Materi Gelombang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(3), 325–330.
Katsh‐Singer, R., McNeill, K. L., & Loper, S. (2016). Scientific Argumentation for All? Comparing Teacher Beliefs about Argumentation in High, Mid, and Low Socioeconomic Status Schools. Science Education, 100(3), 410–436.
Krupa, E. E., Carney, M., & Bostic, J. (2019). Argument-Based Validation in Practice: Examples From Mathematics Education. Applied Measurement in Education, 32(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2018.1544139
Lazarou, D., & Erduran, S. (2021). “Evaluate What I Was Taught, Not What You Expected Me to Know”: Evaluating Students’ Arguments Based on Science Teachers’ Adaptations to Toulmin’s Argument Pattern. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 306–324.
Lazarou, D., Sutherland, R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Argumentation in Science Education as A Systemic Activity: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 150–166.
Noviyani, M., Kusairi, S., & Amin, M. (2016). Penguasan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa SMP pada Pembelajaran IPA dengan Inkuiri Berbasis Argumen. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 974–978.
Osborne, J. F., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific Argument and Explanation: A Necessary Distinction? Science Education, 95(4), 627–638.
Pitorini, D. E., Suciati, S., & Ariyanto, J. (2020). Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa: Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Inkuiri Terbimbing Dipadu Dialog Socrates. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 26–38.
Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin Elements in Chinese EFL University Argumentative Writing. System, 38(3), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
Rahman, A., Diantoro, M., & Yuliati, L. (2018). Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Hukum Newton di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(7), 903–911.
Riwayani, R., Perdana, R., Sari, R., Jumadi, J., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Materi Optik: Problem-Based Learning Berbantuan Edu-Media Simulation. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22548
Rohayati, Y. T., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Setiawan, D. (2020). The Correlation between Student Scientific Argumentation Skills and Cognitive Achievement on PBL and RICOSRE Learning Models in Biology Classes. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000561
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257.
Serway, R. A., & Jewett Jr, J. W. (2010). Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics 8th edn (Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning).
Sutopo, S. (2016). Students’ Understanding of Fundamental Concepts of Mechanical Wave. Indonesian Journal of Physics Education, 12(1), 41–53.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i9.14988
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Tomy Suganda, Parno Parno, Sunaryono Sunaryono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
