Email this article 
Identifikasi Kualitas Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMA pada Termodinamika
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to identify the quality of students' scientific argumentation on thermodynamics. This research is a case study research using descriptive method. Research subjects 78 students from two high schools. The instrument is an essay test with 5 items with reliability of 0.728. Descriptive statistics show that students have 46.54 scientific arguments (medium category), and dominant at level 3 (quite strong). At this level students are able to write components of an argument that are quite good or related but less scientific. The lowest average of students is at level 2, it is in the subtopic of work and thermodynamic processes, because they are only able to write claims. For further research, learning such as ADI, authentic PBL, or STEM approaches is needed.
Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengidentifikasi kualitas argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada termodinamika. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian studi kasus dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif. Subjek penelitian 78 siswa dari dua sekolah menengah atas. Instrumen soal adalah tes esai dengan lima butir soal dengan reliabilitas 0,728. Statistic deskriptif menunjukkan bahwa siswa memiliki argumentasi ilmiah 46.54 (kategori sedang), dan dominan pada level 3 (cukup kuat). Pada level ini siswa sudah mampu menulis komponen argumentasi yang cukup baik atau saling berkaitan namun kurang ilmiah. Rata-rata terendah siswa berada pada level 2, yaitu pada submateri usaha dan proses-proses termodinamika karena hanya mampu untuk menulis claim saja. Untuk penelitan selanjutnya diperlukan pembelajaran seperti ADI, authentic PBL, atau pendekatan STEM.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amin, T. G., Jeppsson, F., Haglund, J., & Strömdahl, H. (2012). Arrow of Time: Metaphorical Construals of Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Science Education, 96(5), 818–848. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21015
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Rineka Cipta.
Bain, K., Moon, A., Mack, M. R., & Towns, M. H. (2014). A Review of Research on the Teaching and Learning of Thermodynamics at the University Level. In Chemistry Education Research and Practice (Vol. 15, Issue 3, pp. 320–335). Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00011k
Besson, U., & De Ambrosis, A. (2014). Teaching Energy Concepts by Working on Themes of Cultural and Environmental Value. Science and Education, 23(6), 1309–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9592-7
Bezen, S., Aykutlu, I., & Bayrak, C. (2016). Conceptual Comprehension of Pre-Service Physics Teachers Towards 1st law of thermodynamics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10157a
Bugarcic, A., Colthorpe, K., Zimbardi, K., Su, H. W., & Jackson, K. (2014). The Development of Undergraduate Science Students’ Scientific Argument Skills in Oral Presentations. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(5), 43–60.
Cavagnetto, A. R. (2010). Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy: A Review of Argument Interventions in K-12 Science Contexts. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 336–371. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310376953
Christensen, W. M., Meltzer, D. E., & Ogilvie, C. A. (2009). Student Ideas Regarding Entropy and The Second Law of Thermodynamics in an Introductory Physics Course. American Journal of Physics, 77(10), 907–917. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3167357
Cigdemoglu, C., & Geban, O. (2015). Improving Students’ Chemical Literacy Levels on Thermochemical and Thermodynamics Concepts Through a Context-Based Approach. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00007f
Cochran, M. J., & Heron, P. R. L. (2006). Development and Assessment of Research-Based Tutorials on Heat Engines and The Second Law Of thermodynamics. American Journal of Physics, 74(8), 734–741. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2198889
Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-School Students’ Informal Reasoning and Argumentation about Biotechnology: An Indicator of Scientific Literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421–1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801992870
Demirbag, M. (2014). Integrating Argument-Based Science Inquiry with Modal Representations: Impact on Science Achievement, Argumentation, and Writing Skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 386–391. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.1632
Digambar, V., Hutatma, K., Mahavidyalay, R., Savaleram, P., & Prof, T. (2013). Assessing the Conceptual Understanding about Heat and Thermodynamics at Undergraduate Level. In European Journal of Physics Education (Vol. 4).
Dreyfus, B. W., Geller, B. D., Meltzer, D. E., & Sawtelle, V. (2015). Resource Letter TTSM-1: Teaching Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics in Introductory Physics, Chemistry, and Biology. American Journal of Physics, 83(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4891673
Duschl, R. (2008). Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2005). The Role of Argumentation in Developing Scientific Literacy.
Erduran, S., & Villamanan, R. (2009). Cool Argument: Engineering Students’ Written Arguments about Thermodynamics in the Context of the Peltier Effect in Refrigeration. Educación Química, 20(2), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0187-893x(18)30018-1
Goedhart, M. J., & Kaper, W. (2002). Chapter 15 from Chemical Energetics To Chemical Thermodynamics.
Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., Herayanti, L., Suranti, N. M. Y., & Yahya, F. (2019). Using Virtual Laboratory to Improve Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Creativity and Problem-Solving Skills on Thermodynamics Concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052038
Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2015). Malaysian Students’ Scientific Argumentation: Do groups perform better than individuals? International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.995147
Jönsson, A. (2016). Student performance on argumentation task in the Swedish National Assessment in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(11), 1825–1840. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1218567
Kapon, S., Laherto, A., & Levrini, O. (2018). Disciplinary authenticity and personal relevance in school science. Science Education, 102(5), 1077–1106. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21458
Kuhn, L., & Reiser, B. (n.d.). Scientific Explanations Students Constructing and Defending Evidence-Based Scientific Explanations.
Levrini, O., Fantini, P., Pecori, B., & Tasquier, G. (2014). Forms of Productive Complexity as Criteria for Educational Reconstruction: The Design of a Teaching Proposal on Thermodynamics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1483–1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.421
Lin, S. S., & Mintzes, J. J. (2010). Learning Argumentation Skills Through Instruction In Socioscientific Issues: The Effect Of Ability Level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 993–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9215-6
Malgieri, M. ., Onorato, P. ., Valentini, A. ., & De Ambrosis, A. (2016). Improving the Connection between The Microscopic and Macroscopic Approaches to Thermodynamics in High School. http://iopscience.iop.org/0031-9120/51/6/065010
Meltzer, D. E. (2004). Investigation of Students’ Reasoning Regarding Heat, Work, and The First Law of Thermodynamics in an Introductory Calculus-Based General Physics Course. American Journal of Physics, 72(11), 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1789161
Mulop, N., Yusof, K. M., & Tasir, Z. (2012). A Review on Enhancing the Teaching and Learning of Thermodynamics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.706
Nababan, N. P., Nasution, D., & Jayanti, R. D. (2019). The Effect of Scientific Inquiry Learning Model and Scientific Argumentation on the Students’ Science Process Skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012064
Perdana, R., Jumadi, J., & Rosana, D. (2019). Relationship between Analytical Thinking Skill and Scientific Argumentation Using PBL with Interactive CK 12 Simulation. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 1(1). https://interactives.ck12.org/simulations/physics.html.
PISA. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): Vol. I. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Pollock, E. B., Thompson, J. R., & Mountcastle, D. B. (2007). Student understanding of the physics and mathematics of process variables in P-V diagrams. AIP Conference Proceedings, 951, 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2820924
Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., Aminah, N. S., & Affandy, H. (2019). Problem-Based Learning with Argumentation Skills to Improve Students’ Concept Understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012065
Rachmatya, R., & Supardiyono, N. (2020). The Correlation Of Scientific Argumentation and Critical Thinking on Global Warming Materials in SMAN 19 Surabaya. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 09(02).
Saricayir, H., Ay, S., Comek, A., Cansiz, G., & Uce, M. (2016). Determining Students’ Conceptual Understanding Level of Thermodynamics. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i6.1421
Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2013). Physics for Scientists and Engineers 9th (ninth) Edition. Cengage Learning.
Sinensis, A. R., Firman, H., Hamidah, I., & Muslim, M. (2019). Reconstruction of collaborative problem solving based learning in thermodynamics with the aid of interactive simulation and derivative games. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032042
Smith, T. I., Christensen, W. M., Mountcastle, D. B., & Thompson, J. R. (2015). Identifying Student Difficulties with Entropy, Heat Engines, and the Carnot Cycle. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020116
Smith, T. I., Christensen, W. M., & Thompson, J. R. (2009). Addressing Student Difficulties with Concepts Related to Entropy, Heat Engines and the Carnot Cycle. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1179, 277–280. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3266735
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
Tsai, C. Y. (2015). Improving Students’ PISA Scientific Competencies Through Online Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.987712
Wang, J., & Buck, G. A. (2016). Understanding a High School Physics Teacher’s Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 577–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9476-1
Wattanakasiwich, P., Taleab, P., Sharma, M. D., & Johnston, I. D. (2013). Development and Implementation of A Conceptual Survey in Thermodynamics. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 21(1), 29–53.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i9.15008
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Aurelia Astria L. Jewaru, Parno Parno, Nasikhudin Nasikhudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
