Pengembangan Pembelajaran Genetika Berbasis Inkuiri Berdasarkan Hasil Penelitian Analisis Variasi Gen Laju Ovulasi

M. Amien Rais, Mohamad Amin, Betty Lukiati

Abstract


Abstract: Teaching science as inquiry is one of the ways to increase student thinking skill. Furthermore, factual and contextual phenomena is needed in inquiry. Analysis of ovulation rate gene research is suitable phenomenon to teach genetics as inquiry. This study is aimed to develop inquiry genetics instructional design based on analysis of ovulation rate gene research. The instructional design had been validated by science/educational experts, and education practitioners (genetics lecture). The results of the validation showed the following scores: 100% (very valid) for material expert, 94,7% (very valid) for the learning expert, and 80% (valid) for field practitioner.

 

Abstrak: Membelajarkan sains dengan menggunakan model inkuiri adalah salah satu cara untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir mahasiswa. Fenomena faktual dan kontekstual diperlukan dalam pembelajaran inkuiri. Penelitian analisis variasi gen laju ovulasi diketahui sangat sesuai sebagai fenomena untuk membelajarkan matakuliah genetika secara inkuiri. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan desain instruksional pembelajaran genetika berbasis inkuiri berdasarkan hasil penelitian analisis variasi gen laju ovulasi. Desain instruksional telah divalidasi oleh ahli materi, ahli pembelajaran dan praktisi lapang. Hasil validasi menunjukkan skor 100%  (sangat valid) untuk ahli materi, 94,7% (sangat valid) untuk ahli pembelajaran dan 83,8% (Cukup valid) untuk praktisi lapangan.

Keywords


genetics; inquiry; reaction rate gene; genetika; inkuiri; gen laju reaksi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aditomo, A., Goodyear, P., Bliuc, A.-M., & Ellis, R. A. (2013). Inquiry-Based Learning in Higher Education: Principal Forms, Educational Objectives, and Disciplinary Variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.616584

Anggraini, P., & Sani, A. (2015). The Effect Of Scientific Inquiry Learning Model and Creative Thinking Ability on Science Process Skills of Student. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v4i2.3238

Babione, C. A. (2015). Practitioner Teacher Inquiry and Research. United States of America: Wiley.

Bayram, Z., Oskay, Ö. Ö., Erdem, E., Özgür, S. D., & Şen, Ş. (2013). Effect of Inquiry based Learning Method on Students’ Motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 988–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.112

Brinkmann, S. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry in Everyday Life: Working with Everyday Life Materials. United States of America: Sage Publisher.

Das, R. C. (2007). Science Teaching In Schools. New Delhi: Sterling Publisher.

Fauzi, A., & Fariantika, A. (2018). Courses Perceived Difficult by Undergraduate Students Majoring in Biology. Biosfer, 11(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v11n2.78-89

Fauziah, R., Amin, M., & Lestari, U. (2017). Deteksi dan Identifikasi Pregnancy Rate Gene Pada Sapi (Bos taurus) Kembar menggunakan Mikrosatelit Sebagai Buku Ajar Berbasis Penelitian untuk Matakuliah Struktur dan Perkembangan Hewan II. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Ferlazzo, L. (2013). Helping Students Motivate Themselves: Practical Answers to Classroom Challenges. United States of America: Routledge.

Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206

Llewellyn, D. (2012). Teaching High School Science Through Inquiry and Argumentation. United Kingdom: Corwin.

Llewellyn, D. (2013). Inquire Within. United States of America: Corwin.

Mintzes, J. J. (2008). Handbook of College Science Teaching. United States of America: NTSA Press.

Murtonen, M., & Balloo, K. (2019). Redefining Scientific Thinking for Higher Education: Higher-Order Thinking. Switzerland: Springer.

Muscatine, C. (2009). Fixing College Education: A New Curriculum for the Twenty-first Century. USA: University of Virginia Press.

National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

Sharma, P. (2009). Teaching of Life Science. New Delhi: APH Publisher.

Staver, J. R. (2007). Teaching Science. New Delhi: APH Publisher.

Zepeda, S. J., & Ponticell, J. A. (2018). The Wiley Handbook of Educational Supervision. United States of America: Wiley Blackwell.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i10.15054

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 M. Amien Rais, Mohamad Amin, Betty Lukiati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License