Email this article 
Argumentasi dalam Teks Pidato Mahasiswa
Abstract
Abstract: Argumentation is closely related to a person's mindset to achieve communication goals. The focus of this research is the argumentation component, the argumentation model, and the argumentation writing style. The data of this research are in the form of words, sentences, and paragraphs from the students' speech texts of undergraduate students of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, Universitas Negeri Malang. Undergraduate students who are used as data sources are students for the 2019/2020 academic year. The results showed that the arguments in the speech texts of Indonesian Language and Literature Education students at the Universitas Negeri Malang contained various components, models, and styles of argumentative writing. These three things have been constructed by students in the speech text. These components, models, and writing styles have a concrete form and their respective functions in strengthening the arguments put forward in the speech texts.
Abstrak: Argumentasi berkaitan erat dengan pola pikir seseorang untuk mencapai tujuan komunikasi. Adapun fokus penelitian ini, yaitu komponen argumentasi, model argumentasi, dan gaya penulisan argumentasi. Data penelitian ini berupa kata, kalimat, dan paragraf dari teks pidato mahasiswa S1 Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Negeri Malang. Mahasiswa S1 yang dijadikan sumber data merupakan mahasiswa tahun ajaran 2019/2020. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa argumentasi dalam teks pidato mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Negeri Malang memuat komponen, model, dan gaya penulisan argumentasi yang bervariasi. Ketiga hal tersebut telah dikonstruksikan oleh mahasiswa dalam teks pidato. Komponen, model, dan gaya penulisan tersebut memiliki bentuk konkret dan fungsi masing-masing dalam memperkuat argumentasi yang dikemukakan dalam teks pidato.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abduh, N. K., Sastromiharjo, A., & Anshori, D. S. (2019). Pola Argumentasi pada Genre Teks Eksposisi Karangan Siswa SMA. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 71–84.
Adian, D. G., & Pratama, H. S. (2015). Teknik Berargumentasi: Berpikir sebagai Kecakapan Hidup , Logika Terapan. Prenadamedia Group.
Alatas, M. (2017). Penalaran dalam Paragraf Teks Tanggapan Kritis Siswa Kelas IX SMP Negeri 3 Malang (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Negeri Malang.
Aleixandre, M. P. J. (2002). Knowledge Producers or Knowledge Consumers? Argumentation and Decision Making About Environmental Management. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1171–1190.
Ardianto, A. (2015). Struktur Argumen dalam Wacana Karya Tulis Ilmiah Mahasiswa. LITERA, 14(1), 1–10.
Arsyad, M., & Mukti, M. (1988). Pembinaan Kemampuan Berbicara Bahasa Indonesia. Erlangga.
Ayalon, M. (2019). Exploring changes in mathematics teachers’ envisioning of potential argumentation situations in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.019
Bachrach, A., Roy, I., & Stockall, L. (2014). Structuring the Argument: Multidisciplinary Research on Verb Argument Structure. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Baker, M. (1999). Argumentation and Constructive Interaction. Foundation of Argumentative Text Processing, 5(1), 179–202.
Baumann, R., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2019). A General Notion of Equivalence for Abstract Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 275(2), 379–410.
Budzynska, K., & Koszowy, M. (2014). Introduction: Argument Studies in Poland. Argumentation, 28(3), 259–266.
Budzynska, K., & Reed, C. (2011). Speech Acts of Argumentation: Inference Anchors and Peripheral Cues in Dialogue. Computational Models of Natural Argument, 11, 3–10.
Bustanul, A., & Rani, A. (2000). Prinsip-prinsip Analisis Wacana. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Chowning, J. T., Griswold, J. C., Kovarik, D. N., & Collins, L. J. (2012). Fostering Critical Thinking, Reasoning, and Argumentation Skills Through Bioethics Education. PLoS ONE, 7(5), 1–8.
Crusius, T., & Channell, C. (2003). The Aims of Argument: A Text and Reader. McGraw-Hill Company.
Dawud, D. (2008). Penalaran dalam Karya Tulis Populer Argumentatif. Jurnal Bahasa dan Seni, 36(1), 41–48.
Eemeren, F. (2018). Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Persperctive. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Eemeren, F. H. van. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Eemeren, F. H. van. (2015a). Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Eemeren, F. H. van. (2015b). Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory (B. Garssen, Ed.). Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Henkemans, F. (2017). Argumentation Analysis and Evaluation. Routledge.
Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2009). Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Henkemans, A. (2014). Speech Act Theory and the Study of Argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36(1), 41–58.
Isbandi, S., & Wiendijarti, I. (2014). Kajian Retorika untuk Pengembangan Pengetahuan dan Keterampilan Berpidato. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 12(1), 70–84.
Jacobs, S. (1989). Speech Acts and Arguments. Argumentation, 3(4), 345–365.
Khine, M. S. (Ed.). (2012). Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice, and Research. Springer.
Kim, D., & Benbasat, I. (2006). The Effects of Trust-Assuring Arguments on Consumer Trust in Internet Stores: Application of Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 197–205.
Laar, J. A. V., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2018). The Role of Argument in Negotiation. Argumentation, 32(4), 549–567.
Linhares, J. (2019). The Rehabilitation of Practical Reasoning and the Persistence of Deductivism: An Impossible Challenge? International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 32(4), 527–538.
Lunsford, A. A., Ruszkiewicz, J. J., & Walters, K. (2013). Everything’s an Arguments with Readings. Bedford.
Macagno, F., & Walton, D. (2014). Emotive Language in Argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
Mayberry, K. (2009). Everyday Arguments: A Guide to Writing and Reading Effective Arguments. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publication.
Nelson, L. (2016). A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Nussbaum, E. (2011). Argumentation, Dialogue Theory, and Probability Modeling: Alternative Frameworks for Argumentation Research in Education. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 84–106.
Olmos, P. (2017). Narration as Argument. Springer International Publishing AG.
Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The Analysis of Toulmin Elements in Chinese EFL University Argumentative Writing. System, 38(3), 444–456.
Rainbolt, G. W., & Dwyer, S. L. (2013). Critical Thinking: The Art of Argument. Cengage Learning.
Rex, L. A., Thomas, E. E., & Engel, S. (2010). Applying Toulmin: Teaching Logical Reasoning and Argumentative Writing. English Journal, 99(6), 56–62.
Sakai, K., Higashinaka, R., Yoshikawa, Y., Ishiguro, H., & Tomita, J. (2020). Hierarchical Argumentation Structure for Persuasive Argumentative Dialogue Generation. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 103(2), 424–434.
Scheuer, O., Mclaren, B. M., & Harrell, M. (2011). Scripting Collaboration: What Affects Does it Have on Student Argumentation? International Conference on Computer in Education, 1–8.
Scheuer, O., McLaren, B. M., Harrell, M., & Weinberger, A. (2011). Will Structuring the Collaboration of Students Improve Their Argumentation? Dalam G. Biswas, S. Bull, J. Kay, & A. Mitrovic (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (Vol. 6738, hlm. 544–546). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Schneider, J. (2014). An Informatics Perspective on Argumentation Mining. http://figshare.com/articles/Fields_Studying_Argumentation_2010_09_15_/1149925
Schwarz, B., & Baker, M. (2017). Dialogue, Argumentation, and Education: History, Theory, and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Setyaningsih, Y. (2016). Pola Argumen Paragraf Argumentatif pada Artikel Jurnal Terakreditasi Bidang Ekonomi (Perspektif Stephen Toulmin). Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 15(2), 136–156.
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2), 235–260.
Susilowati, M. (2014). A Conceptual Review on Linguistic Approaches of Identity Investigation. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(2), 107–113.
Swatridge, C. (2014). The Oxford Guide to Effective Argument and Critical Thinking. Oxford University Press.
Syaifulloh, S. (2018). Argumen dalam Teks Tanggapan Kritis Karya Siswa SMP (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Negeri Malang.
Tindale, C. W. (2007). Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning. Collier Macmillan Publishers.
Trachtman, J. P. (2013). The Tools of Argument How the Best Lawyers Think, Argue, and Win. Publishing Platform North Charleston.
Wachsmuth, H., Stede, M., & Baff, R. E. (2018). Argumentation Synthesis Following Rhetorical Strategies. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 3753–3765.
Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
Williams, A. (2015). Arguments in Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i11.15114
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Dedi Gunawan Saputra, Dawud Dawud, Imam Agus Basuki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
