Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA Topik Usaha dan Energi

Sigit Triwibowo, Parno Parno, Eny Latifah

Abstract


Abstract: Scientific literacy is an important skill needed in the 21st century. Scientific literacy is encouraged by many countries to deal with economic and technological developments. Scientific literacy is the someones’ capability when solve a problem using the knowledge and scientific thinking. The purpose of this study is to explain student’s scientific literacy on work and energy. The research was conducted on 72 students in class XI MIPA at SMAN 4 MADIUN for the 2020/2021 academic year. The method of data collection was a test. The form of scientific literacy question was essays with a reliability of 0.608. The result of this study state that students’ scientific skill are low. The level of students’ scientific literacy are nominal.

Abstrak: Literasi sains menjadi kemampuan penting yang diperlukan pada abad 21. Literasi sains digalakkan oleh banyak negara untuk menghadapi perkembangan ekonomi dan teknologi. Literasi sains adalah kemampuan menggunakan pengetahuan dan pemikiran ilmiah untuk memecahkan masalah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan kemampuan literasi sains siswa pada pokok bahasan usaha dan energi. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada 72 siswa pada kelas XI di SMAN 4 MADIUN tahun ajaran 2020/2021.  Metode pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan tes. Soal tes berupa butir soal essay kemampuan literasi sains dengan reliabilitas 0,608. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tingkat literasi sains siswa rendah. Tingkat  literasi sains siswa berada pada kategori nominal.

Keywords


scientific literacy; work and energy; literasi sains; usaha dan energi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Momani, F. N. N. (2016). Assessing the Development of Scientific Literacy among Undergraduates College of Education. Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v6i2.9405

Angraini, G. (2014). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA Kelas X di Kota Solok. Prosiding Mathematics and Sciences Forum 2014, 161–170.

Dalaklioglu, S., Demirici, N., & Şekercioglu, A. (2015). 11th Grade Students’ Difficulties and Misconceptions about Energy and Momentum Concepts. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(January), 13–21.

Dragoş, V., & Mih, V. (2015). Scientific Literacy in School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209(July), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.273

Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): Measuring Undergraduates’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026

Juhji, M. (2020). Pengaruh Literasi Sains dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Dasar Biologi. Edusains, 12(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i1.13048

Menia, M., Mudzakir, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2017). The Effect of Conceptual Metaphors Through Guided Inquiry on Student’s Conceptual Change. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848(May). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983977

Nofiana, M., & Julianto, T. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP di Kota Purwokerto Ditinjau dari Aspek Konten, Proses, dan Konteks Sains. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Humaniora), 1(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v1i2.1682

Nurwulandari, N. N. (2018). Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Literasi Sains terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Mahasiswa pada Pokok Bahasan Energi. Jurnal Pendidikan : Riset dan Konseptual, 2(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.28926/riset_konseptual.v2i2.51

Nwosu, A. A., & Ibe, E. (2014). Gender and Scientific Literacy Levels : Implications for Sustainable Science and Technology Education ( STE ) for the 21 st Century Jobs . Journal of Education and Practice, 5(8), 113–118.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework Science, Reading,Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-en

Putra, M. I. S., Widodo, W., & Jatmiko, B. (2016). The Development of Guided Inquiry Science Learning Materials to Improve Science Literacy Skill of Prospective MI teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5794

Putri, A. R., Yuliati, L., & Hidayat, A. (2019). Literasi Saintifik Siswa SMA pada Hukum Archimedes. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(8), 987-992.

Rachmatullah, A., Diana, S., & Rustaman, N. Y. (2016). Profile of Middle School Students on Scientific Literacy Achievements by Using Scientific Literacy Assessments (SLA). AIP Conference Proceedings, 1708(February 2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941194

Rahmatina, D. I., Sutopo, & Wartono. (2018). Identifikasi Kesulitan Siswa SMA pada Materi Usaha-Energi. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 2(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v2i1.2370

Rivaldo, L., Taqwa, M. R. A., Zainuddin, A., & Faizah, R. (2020). Analysis of Students’ Difficulties about Work and Energy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032088

Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., & Puspitasari, I. (2017). Professional Development Model for Science Teachers Based on Scientific Literacy. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering.https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/166/1/012037

Series, C. (2017). Science Literacy : How do High School Students Solve PISA Test Items ?

Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012166

Sikas, N. (2017). Enhancing Scientific Literacy through Implementation of Inquiry-Based Science Education (IBSE) in Malaysia Science Curriculum. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2685

Sukowati, D., Rusilowati, A., & Sugianto. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains dan Metakogntif Peserta Didik. Physics Communication, 1(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.15294/physcomm.v1i1.8961

Surpless, B., Bushey, M., & Halx, M. (2014). Developing Scientific Literacy in Introductory Laboratory Courses: A Model for Course Design and Assessment. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(2), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-073.1

Udompong, L., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Diagnosis of the Scientific Literacy Characteristics of Primary Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5091–5096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1079

Yanti, T. R., Yuliati, L., & Wisodo, H. (2019). Kemampuan Literasi Saintifik Siswa SMA pada Materi Optik Geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(6), 700.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i11.15146

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Sigit Triwibowo, Parno Parno, Eny Latifah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License