Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry terhadap Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah

Putri Qori Utami, Sumari Sumari, I Wayan Dasna

Abstract


Abstract: The purpose of this study is to investigate effect of the Argument Driven Inquiry model on the scientific argumentation skills of 11th grade students in terms of goal orientation. A quasi-experimental research design is a 2 x 2 factorial. The study involved an experimental group (ADI) and a control group (Inquiry) each consisting of 34 students. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for interpreting the data. Based on data analysis, there are differences in students’ scientific argumentation skills between the experimental and control group (sig. 0,011), but there is no significant difference in terms of goal orientation (sig. 0,267). There is no interaction between the learning model and goal orientation on the scientific argumentation skills of students one of the SMAN in Malang (sig. 0,819).

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model Argument Driven Inquiry terhadap kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa kelas 11 yang ditinjau dari orientasi tujuan. Desain penelitian menggunakan rancangan eksperimental semu yaitu faktorial 2 x 2. Penelitian ini melibatkan kelas eksperimen (ADI) dan kelas kontrol (Inkuiri) masing-masing berjumlah 34 siswa. Analisis varian dua arah (Two Way ANOVA) digunakan untuk menginterpretasikan data. Berdasarkan analisis data, terdapat perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa antara kelas eksperimen dan kontrol (sig. 0,011), tetapi tidak terdapat perbedaan signifikan ditinjau dari orientasi tujuan (sig. 0,267). Interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan orientasi tujuan tidak ada terhadap kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa salah satu SMAN Malang (sig. 0,819).

Keywords


argument driven inquiry; scientific argumentation; goal orientation; argument driven inquiry; argumentasi ilmiah; orientasi tujuan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acar, O. (2008). Argumentation Skills and Conceptual Knowledge of Undergraduate Students in a Physics by Inquiry Class. Dissertation : The Ohio State University.

Analita, R. N. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Multi Representasi dengan Orientasi Tujuan Berbeda terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Tingkat Tinggi Siswa pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan. Tesis : Pascasarjana UM.

Barke, H. (2009). Misconception in Chemistry. In Springer.

Beins, B. C., & McCarthy, M. A. (2012). Research Methods and Statistics. Pearson Education.

Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of Argumentation from Science Studies and the Learning Sciences and Their Implications for the Practices of Science Education. Science Education, 92(3), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20278

Cavagnetto, A. R. (2010). Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy: A Review of Argument Interventions in K-12 Science Contexts. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 336–371. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310376953

Cetin, P. S. (2014). Explicit Argumentation Instruction to Facilitate Conceptual Understanding and Argumentation skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.850071

Chang, H. P., Chen, C. C., Guo, G. J., Cheng, Y. J., Lin, C. Y., & Jen, T. H. (2011). The Development of a Competence Scale for Learning Science: Inquiry and Communication. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9256-x

Cigdemoglu, C., Arslan, H. O., & Cam, A. (2017). Argumentation to Foster Pre-service Science Teachers’ Knowledge, Competency, and Attitude on the Domains of Chemical Literacy of Acids and Bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00167j

Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry in Laboratory Instruction. Educational Sciences : Theory and Practice, 15(1), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2324

Deng, Y., & Wang, H. (2017). Research on Evaluation of Chinese Students’ Competence in Written Scientific Argumentation in the Context of Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(1), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00076b

Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking Science to School : Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. In National Research Council. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11625

Dweck, C. S., & Ellen, L. L. (1988). A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.

Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 Achievement Goal Framework. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 80, Issue 3, pp. 501–519). https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.3.501

Eymur, G. (2018). Developing High School Students’ Self-Efficacy and Perceptions about Inquiry and Laboratory Skills through Argument-Driven Inquiry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(5), 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00934

Fadly, W., & Miaturrohmah. (2021). Arguing Skillfully with Argument-Driven Inquiry Science Textbooks. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 9(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i1.18630

Fatmawati, Z. A., Susilowati, S. M. E., & Prihandono, R. S. I. (2019). Effect of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) with Problem Solving Method for Student’s Argumentation and Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 8(3), 255–263. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise

Ford, J. K., Weissbein, D. A., Smith, E. M., Gully, S. M., & Salas, E. (1998). Relationships of Goal Orientation, Metacognitive Activity, and Practice Strategies with Learning Outcomes and Transfer. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.218

Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Introduction: Macro, Submicro and Symbolic Representations and the Relationship Between Them: Key Models in Chemical Education. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_1

Grooms, J. (2020). A Comparison of Argument Quality and Students’ Conceptions of Data and Evidence for Undergraduates Experiencing Two Types of Laboratory Instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(8), 2057–2064. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00026

Hadiwidodo, S., Tukiran, T., & Taufikurahmah, T. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Kimia Model Argument Driven Inquiry Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 7(1), 1416–1421. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v7n1.p1416-1421

Hasnunidah, N. (2016). Pengaruh ADI dengan Scaffolding dan Kemampuan Akademik terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi, Berpikir Kritis dan Pemahaman Konsep Biologi Dasar Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan MIPA Universitas Lampung. Disertasi : Pascasarjana UM.

Hasnunidah, N., & Wiono, W. J. (2019). Argument-Driven Inquiry, Gender, and Its Effects on Argumentation Skills. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 4(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i2.4676

Hidayat, W., & Aripin, U. (2019). The Improvement of Students’ Mathematical Understanding Ability Influenced from Argument-Driven Inquiry Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032085

Lewis, S. E. (2018). Goal Orientations of General Chemistry Students via the Achievement Goal Framework. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00148G

Mendikbud. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Pusat Asesmen Dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–37.

Mustapa, K. (2014). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Online dan Ekspositori dengan Orientasi Tujuan Berbeda terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Kimia Dasar. Disertasi: Pascasarjana UM.

Mustofa, Pikoli, M., & Suleman, N. (2013). Hubungan Antara Kemampuan Berpikir Formal dan Kecerdasan Visual-Spasial dengan Kemampuan Menggambarkan Bentuk Molekul Siswa Kelas XI MAN Model Gorontalo Tahun Ajaran 2010 / 2011. Jurnal Entropi, 8(1), 551–561.

Nurramadhani, A., Ms, H., & Rahman, T. (2017). Argument-DrivenInquiry (ADI): The Way to Develop Junior High School Student’s Argumentation Skills in Science Learning. 57(ICMSEd 2016), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.2991/icmsed-16.2017.28

Sampson, V., & Walker, J. P. (2012). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Undergraduate Students Write to Learn by Learning to Write in Chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1443–1485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667581

Sartono, N., Rusdi, & Hadianto, D. (2017). Influence of Type Mastery and Performance Goal Orientation on Learning Result at SMAN 64 Jakarta. 3rd International Seminar on Science Education, 3(October), 245–249.

Septikasari, R., & Frasandy, R. N. (2018). Keterampilan 4C Abad 21 Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Dasar. Jurnal Tarbiyah Al-Awlad, VIII(02), 107–117.

Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional Conceptual Change. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates : Mahwah, New Jersey.

Swartz, D. E. (2002). Goal Orientation and Training Transfer Initiation and Maintenance. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Tukiran, Nikmah, C., & Nasrudin, H. (2020). Improving Students ’ Self-Efficacy And Learning Outcomes Using Argument Driven Inquiry Learning Model. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 8(2), 133–138.

Walker, J. P., Sampson, V., Grooms, J., Anderson, B., & Zimmerman, C. O. (2012). Argument-Driven Inquiry in Undergraduate Chemistry Labs: The Impact on Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Argument Skills, and Attitudes Toward Science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 82–89.

Walker, J. P., Sampson, V., & Zimmerman, C. O. (2011). Argument-driven inquiry: An introduction to a new instructional model for use in undergraduate chemistry labs. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(8), 1048–1056. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100622h

Wijayanti, R., Waluya, S. B., & Masrukan. (2018). Analysis of Mathematical Literacy Ability Based on Goal Orientation in Model Eliciting Activities Learning with Murder Strategy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012141

Yore, L. D. (2012). Science Litreacy for All : More than a Slogan, Logo or Rally Flag! In Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research: Moving Forward (pp. 5–23). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3980-2




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i4.15217

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Putri Qori Utami, Sumari Sumari, I Wayan Dasna

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License