Curriculum Application: Designing Aims and Learning Outcomes in the English Department

Yulia Agustina, M. Adib Nazri, Hary Murcahyanto

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine curriculum developers in determining curriculum objectives, learning outcomes, and aspects of the design of English study programs. This research uses the descriptive qualitative method. Data triangulation, observation, interviews, and documentation were used to collect data using a list of questions related to the curriculum and documentation. The result of this finding is that the English department curriculum is by the applicable standards in Indonesia. In designing the language curriculum, there is only one aspect that has not been applied as an indicator in its design, namely environmental analysis

Keywords


Curriculum application, designing aims, Learning outcomes, English department, Higher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aktaş, C. K., & Gündoğdu, K. (2020). An extensive evaluation study of the English preparatory curriculum of a foreign language school. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 10(1), 169–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.007

Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: Teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106–107. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095725

Andrian, D., Kartowagiran, B., & Hadi, S. (2018). The instrument development to evaluate local curriculum in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 921–934. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1191699

Bahri, S. (2017). Pengembangan kurikulum dasar dan tujuannya. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 11(1), 15–34.

Basturkmen, H. (2014). Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617040

Belmawa, R. (2018). Panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi di era industri 4.0.

Cheung, K. K. C. (2020). Exploring the inclusion of nature of science in Biology curriculum and high-stakes assessments in Hong Kong. Science & Education, 29(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00113-x

Collins, C. S., & Stockton, C. M. (2018). The central role of theory in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1609406918797475. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/

Elihami, E., Safrina, K., Mashar, R., & Murcahyanto, H. (2022). Building character strengths through “new Islamic education” in facing era society 5.0: Bibliometric reviews.

Hastie, P., & Hay, P. (2012). Qualitative approaches. Research Methods in Physical Education and Youth Sport, 79–94.

Heinle, T. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Canada: Kathleen Graves.

Hirshberg, M. J., Flook, L., Enright, R. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2020). Integrating mindfulness and connection practices into preservice teacher education improves classroom practices. Learning and Instruction, 66(January 2019), 101298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101298

Holmes, B., & McLean, M. (2018). The curriculum: A comparative perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454332

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018). Buku panduan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi.

Khanova, J., Roth, M. T., Rodgers, J. E., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2015). Student experiences across multiple flipped courses in a single curriculum. Medical Education, 49(10), 1038–1048. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12807

Khodijah, N. (2016). Ketepatan penyusunan kurikulum Prodi MPI Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Raden Fatah dikaitkan dengan KKNI, SN-DIKTI, dan panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi tahun 2014. El-Idare: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 80–100. http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/El-idare/article/view/906

Macalister, J., & Nation, I. S. P. (2019). Language curriculum design. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203763

Marcu, N. A. (2020). Designing functional ESP (English for Specific Purposes) courses. Procedia Manufacturing, 46, 308–312.

Mcleod, P., & Steinert, Y. (2015). Twelve tips for curriculum renewal. Medical Teacher, 37(3), 232–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.932898

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Morris, P., & Adamson, B. (2010). Curriculum, schooling and society in Hong Kong (Vol. 1). Hong Kong University Press. https://books.google.co.id/

Nazri, M. A., Nursaly, M. A. R., Murcahyanto, H., & Ernawati, T. (2021). Bahasa Inggris sebagai pendidikan karakter pada full day school di Madrasah Aliyah. JOEAI: Journal of Education and Instruction, 4(2), 457–463.

Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2014). The handbook of English for specific purposes. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.co.id/

Prihantoro, C. R. (2015). The perspective of curriculum in Indonesia on environmental education. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2014.915

Putra, K. A. (2014). The implication of curriculum renewal on ELT in Indonesia. Parole, 4(1), 63–75. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/

Rahimpour, M. (2010). Current trends on syllabus design in foreign language instruction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1660–1664. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.254

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge university press. https://books.google.co.id/

Ristekdikti. (2016). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan untuk perguruan tinggi. http://eprints.ukh.ac.id/id/eprint/840/1/7

Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. (2020). English for specific purposes: Traditions, trends, directions. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 247–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.16342

Sari, I. N., Lestari, L. P., Kusuma, D. W., Mafulah, S., Brata, D. P. N., Iffah, J. D. N., Widiatsih, A., Utomo, E. S., Maghfur, I., & Sofiyana, M. S. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif. UNISMA PRESS.

Sgier, L. (2012). Qualitative data analysis. An Initiat. Gebert Ruf Stift, 19, 19–21.

Sugiyono, S. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.

Suteja, J., & Cirebon, I. S. N. (2017). Model-model pembelajaran dalam kurikulum berbasis kompetensi KKNI di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Edueksos, 6(1), 81–100. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/

Syakur, A., Zainuddin, H. M., & Hasan, M. A. (2020). Needs analysis English for Specific Purposes (ESP) for vocational pharmacy students. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(2), 724–733. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i2.901

Wu, H., & Volker, D. L. (2009). The use of theory in qualitative approaches to research: Application in end‐of‐life studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(12), 2719–2732. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05157.x

Yassi, A. H. (2018). Syllabus design of English language teaching. Prenada Media. https://books.google.co.id/




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v8i3.21405

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Yulia Agustina, M. Adib Nazri, Hary Murcahyanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License