Email this article 
Tapping Toulmin’s Sound Argument: EL Undergraduates’ Arguments Quality in the Research Discussion
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, F. (2020). Moves within the Literature Reviews and Discussion Sections of International Postgraduate Theses and Dissertation on ELT and Applied Linguistics. English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal.
Arsyad, S., Purwo, B. K., & Adnan, Z. (2020). The argument style in research article discussions to support research findings in language studies. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16626
Aswadi, Rafi’uddin, A., Dawud, & Basuki, I. A. (2021). Argument Pattern in Student Argumentative Essays in Higher Education UUsing the ToUlmin Model. Psychology and Education, 58(3), 1046–1055.
Basthomi, Y. (2009). Examining Research Spaces in Doctoral Prospectuses. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 20(2), 140. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v20i2/140-15
Bermani, R. A., Safnil., & Arono. (2017). An Analysis of Argument Structure of Research Article of English Postgraduate Program of Bengkulu University Published In Journal. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature2, 2(2), 47–64.
Dastjerdi, Z. S., Tan, H., & Abdullah, A. N. (2017). Rhetorical structure of Results and Discussion chapter in Master’s dissertations across disciplines. Discourse and Interaction, 10(2), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.5817/di2017-2-61
Granger, S. (2012). How to use Foreign and Second Language Learner Corpora. In Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide (Issue November). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340.ch2
Hussin, N. I. S. M., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2018). Organisation and move structure in the results and discussion chapter in Malaysian undergraduates’ final-year projects. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 26(4), 2365–2377.
Irawati, L., Saukah, A., & Suharmanto. (2018). Indonesian authors writing their discussion sections both in English and Indonesian research articles.Cakrawala Pendidikan. 37. 447-456. 10.21831/cp.v38i3.21536.
Jin, B. (2018). Rhetorical Differences in Research Article Discussion Sections of High-and Low-Impact Articles in the Field of Chemical Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2017.2747358
Kheryadi, & Suseno, M. (2016). Analysis of Rhetorical Moves of Journal Articles and Its Implication to the Teaching of Academic Writing. July.
Kristianti, T. P., Ramli, M., & Ariyanto, J. (2018). Improving the argumentative skills of high school students through teacher’s questioning techniques and argumentative assessment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012012
Latief, M.A. (2019). Research Methods On Language Learning An Introduction (7th Ed.). Malang. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Liu, Y., & Buckingham, L. (2018). The schematic structure of discussion sections in applied linguistics and the distribution of meta-discourse markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34(July), 97-109.
Loi, Chek K., Evans M., Akkakoson, S., Ahmed, S., & Ahmed, S. (2015). Rhetorical Patterns In the Discussion Section of Malay Research Articles. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(2)., 118-121.
Magalhães, A. L. (2020). Teaching How to Develop an Argument Using the Toulmin Model. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Educational Research, 2(3), 1–7. www.ijmcer.com
Mohammad, S., Adel, R., & Moghadam, R. G. (2015). A Comparison of Moves in Conclusion Sections of Research Articles in Psychology, Persian Literature and Applied Linguistics. Teaching English Language, 9(2), 167–191.
Moyetta, D. (2016). The discussion section of english and spanish research articles in psychology: A contrastive study. ESP Today, 4(1), 87–106.
Nodoushan, M., & Khakbaz, N. (2011). Theses ‘Discussion’sections: A structural move analysis. International Journal of English Studies, 5(3), 111-132.
Reed, C., & Rowe, G. (2006). Translating toulmin diagrams: Theory neutrality in argument representation. 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_23
Sastrawati, I.,Hambali, U.,Mannong, A.B.B., Bachtiar, H. (2021). Analyzing Students ’ Critical Thinking Pattern in Writing Argumentative Paragraph Based on Stephen Toulmin Theory. Ethical Lingua.Vol 8, No 1. 191–197.
Stapleton, P., & Wu, Y. (Amy). (2015). Assessing the quality of arguments in students’ persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.11.006
Suhartoyo, E., Mukminatien, N., & Laksmi, E. D. (2015). The Effect of Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation Within TWPS Strategy on Students’ Critical Thinking on Argumentative Essay. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 3(2), 143–153. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jph
Suherdi, D & Kurniawan, E & Lubies, A. H. (2020). A genre analysis of research articles ‘finding and discussion’ sections written by Indonesian undergraduate EFL. Journal of Applied Linguistics. 10(1), 59-72
Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using “toulmin Argumentation Pattern” analysis of high school student at Subang on topic hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031
Taherdoost, H. (2022). How to Write an Effective Discussion in a Research Paper ; a Guide to Writing the Discussion Section of a Research Article. April. https://doi.org/10.33552/OAJAP.2022.05.000609
Thakur, N. (2014). Quality of Writing of Discussion and Drawing Conclusion in Relation to Interdisciplinary Research. International Journal for Research in Education, 3(4), 7–12.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press
Vieira, R. F., De Lima, R. C., & Mizubuti, E. S. G. (2019). How to write the discussion section of a scientific article. Acta Scientiarum - Agronomy, 41(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v41i1.42621
Warsito, W., Arsyad, S., & Harahap, A. (2017). Stating and Defending New Knowledge Claim: a Rhetorical Analysis on the
Discussion Section of English Master Thesis By Indonesian Efl Learners. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English
Education), 4(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v4i2.6746
Yang, R. (2022). An empirical study of claims and qualifiers in ESL students’ argumentative writing based on Toulmin model. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00133-w
Yang, R, & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusion. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365-385
Young, M. (2017). Quality of literature review and discussion of findings in selected papers on integration of ICT in teaching, role of mentors, and teaching science through science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Educational Research and Reviews, 12(4), 189—201.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v8i4.21476
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Adianto Restu Wicaksono, Yazid Basthomi, Anik Nunuk Wulyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
