Email this article 
PENGARUH PRAKTIKUM DAN DEMONSTRASI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI TERBIMBING TERHADAP MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI ASAM BASA DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN AWAL
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the students' motivation that learned by two different methods viewed from prior knowledge. This study used the quasi-experimental design. Data were obtained from motivation questionnaire which consist of 31 point statements. Data were analyzed using two ways ANOVA. The results showed that: (1) there was differences in students' motivation that learned with hands-on and demonstration in guided inquiry learning, (2) student with high prior knowledge have better motivation in learning rather than students with low prior knowledge, (3) there was no interaction between learning methods and prior knowledge on students' motivation.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan motivasi belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan 2 metode berbeda ditinjau dari kemampuan awal. Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan eksperimen semu. Data penelitian diperoleh dari angket motivasi yang terdiri atas 31 butir pernyataan. Data dianalisis menggunakan ANOVA dua jalan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) ada perbedaan motivasi belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan praktikum dan demonstrasi dalam pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing, (2) siswa dengan kemampuan awal tinggi memiliki motivasi belajar yang lebih baik dibandingkan siswa dengan kemampuan awal rendah, (3) tidak ada interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan kemampuan awal terhadap motivasi belajar siswa.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aikenhead, G. S. 2006. Science Education for Everyday Life: Evidence-based Practice. New York Teachers College Press.
Arifin, M. 1995. Pengembangan Program Pengajaran Bidang Studi Kimia. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Bayram, Z., Oskay, O.O., Erdem, E., Ozgur, S.D. & Sen, S. 2013. Effect of Inquiry Based Learning Method on Student Motivation. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106 :988—996.
Bennett, J., Gräsel, C., Parchmann, I. & Waddington, D. 2005. Context-based and Conventional Approaches to Teaching Chemistry: Comparing teachers’ views. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13): 1521—1547.
Broman, K., Ekborg, M. & Johnels, D. 2011. Chemistry in Crisis? Perspective on Teaching and Learning Chemistry in Swedish Upper Secondary School. NORDINA, 7(1): 43—60.
Cheung, D. 2011. Teacher Beliefs about Implementing Guided-Inquiry Laboratory Experiments for Secondary School Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 88: 1462—1468.
Chung, P.T. 1997. Effect of Chemical Demonstration in Teaching Analytical Chemistry. Thesis. Master of Science. Simon Fraser University.
Creswell, J.W. 2009. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches 3th edition. United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dillon, J. 2008. A Review of the Research on Practical Work in School Science. London: King’s College London.
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E. & Hyun, H.H. 2011. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 8th Edition. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
Handayani, S. 2008. Hubungan Pengetahuan, Sikap, Minat dan Motivasi Belajar dengan Prestasi Belajar Mata Kuliah KDM 1 pada Mahasiswa Semester 1 Akper Giri Satria Husada Wonogiri. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Surakarta: Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Hilman. 2014. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Mind Map terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Papalang Kabupaten Mamuju Sulawesi Barat. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 2(4): 221—229.
Iskandar, S.M. 2011. Pendekatan Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Konstruktivis. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Jonassen, D. H. & Grabowski, B. L. 1993. Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning and Instruction. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Kusumaningtyas, R.G. 2010. Pengaruh Pendekatan Inquiry Terpimpin melalui Metode Eksperimen dan Demonstrasi terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa Mata Pelajaran IPA Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Yogyakarta: Pascasarjana Universitas Gajah Mada.
Lin, Y.C., Lin, Y.T. & Huang, Y.M. 2011. Development of a Diagnostic System Using a Testing-based Approach for Strengthening Student Prior Knowledge. Computer & Education, 57: 1557—1570.
Mckee, E., Williamson, V. M. & Ruebush, L.E. 2007. Effects of a Demonstration Laboratory on Student Learning. Journal Science Educational Technology, 16 (5): 395—400.
Mulyasa. 2007. Menjadi Guru Profesional Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Pavelich, M.J. & Abraham, M.R. 1979. An Inquiry Format Laboratory Program for General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 56(2): 100—103.
Schunk, D.H., Pintrich, P. R. & Meece, J. L. 2012. Motivasi dalam Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Aplikasi Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Shakhashiri, B.Z. 2009. Practical Work In Chemistry Education. Keynote Address at the 42 IUPAC Congress Glasgow, Scotland. 5 Agustus 2009.
Sheppard, K. 2006. High School Students’ Understanding of Titrations and Related Acid-Base Phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7 (1): 32—45.
Tuan, H.L., Chin, C.C., Tsai, C.C. & Cheung, S.F. 2005. Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the most learning styles student. International journal of science and mathematics education,3 (4):541—566.
Tuan, H.L., Chin, C.C. & Shieh, S. H. 2005. The Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Students’ Motivation towards Science Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6): 639—654.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i3.6161
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
