LEVEL BERPIKIR GEOMETRI VAN HIELE BERDASARKAN GENDER PADA SISWA KELAS VII SMP ISLAM HASANUDDIN DAU MALANG

Itsnaniya Fatwa Nurani, Edy Bambang Irawan, Cholis Sa’dijah

Abstract


Level of geomatri Van Hiele stated that a person will go through five level of development, those were; level 0 (visualization), level 1 (analysis), level 2 (informal deduction), level 3 (deduction), and level 4 (rigor). The purpose of this study was to determine and describe the Van Hiele geometric thinking levels by gender in class VII SMP Islam Hasanuddin Dau Malang. The method used in this research was descriptive qualitative. The instrument used was Van Hiele Geometry Test (VHGT) and interviews. The tests and interviews were conducted to 6 students which consited of 3 male and 3 female whose  high, medium and low ability. The results showed that the student reached judging from the gender, female students whose high ability reached level 1 (analysis) while low ability female students were at level 0 (visualization). High ability male students were at level 1 (analysis) while male students whose low ability was at level 0 (visualization).

Tahap perkembangan berpikir  geomatri Van Hiele menyatakan bahwa seseorang akan melalui lima tahap perkembangan yaitu  level 0 (visualisasi), level 1 (analisis), level 2 (deduksi informal), level 3 (deduksi), dan level 4 (rigor). Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan mendeskripsikan level berpikir geometri Van Hiele berdasarkan gender pada siswa kelas VII SMP Islam Hasanuddin Dau Malang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes berpikir geometri Van Hiele Geometry Test (VHGT) dan wawancara. Pemberian tes dan wawancara dilakukan kepada 6 orang siswa yaitu 3 siswa perempuan dan 3 siswa laki-laki yang masing-masing berkemampuan tinggi, sedang dan rendah. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa ditinjau dari gender siswa perempuan berkemampuan tinggi dan sedang berada pada level 1 (analisis) sedangkan siswa perempuan berkemampuan rendah berada pada level 0 (visualisasi). Siswa laki-laki bekemampuan tinggi dan berada pada level 1 (analisis) sedangkan siswa laki-laki berkemampuan sedang dan rendah berada pada level 0 (visualisasi).


Keywords


thinking level; geometry; van hiele; gender level berpikir; geometri; van hiele, gender

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdussakir. 2010. Pembelajaran Geometri Sesuai Teori Van Hiele. Jurnal Kependidikan dan Keagamaan, Vol VII Nomor 2, Januari 2010, ISSN 1693-1499.

Anwar, H. 2012. Analisis Tingkat Berpikir Geometri Siswa SMP Negeri 2 Gading Probolinggo Kelas IX Menurut Teori Van Heile. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Malang.

Burger, W. F. & Shaughnessy, J. M. 1986. Characterizing the van Hiele Levels of Development in Geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 17(I):31—48.

Clements, D.H & Batitista. 1992. Geometry and Spatial Reasioning. Dalam D.A. Grows, (ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching and Learning Matematics. (pp.420—464). Newyork: MacMillan Publisher Company.

Creswell, J.W.2012. Educational Research: Planing, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative Research 4th Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Crowley, M. L. 1987. The Van Hiele Model of Development of Geometric Though. Reston, VA: National Council Of Teachers of Mathematics.

Halpern, D. F. 1986. Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities. Hillsdale, N. J. Lawrence Erlbaum Association.

Ikhsan, M. 2008. Meningkatkan Prestasi dan Motivasi Siswa dalam Geometri melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Teori Van Hiele. Tidak dipublikasikan. Disertasi PPS UPI.

Jane, Mary Schmitt. 2006. Developing Geometric Reasoning. Washington DC: GED Mathematics Training Institute.

Lestariyani, S. 2014. Identifikasi Tahap Berpikir Geometri Siswa SMP Negeri 2 Ambarawa Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele. Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP-UKSW. (Online), (http://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/3648), diakses 10 Mei 2016

NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Nur’aeni. 2000. Model Pembelajaran Untuk Memahami Konsep unsur-unsur bangun ruang kubus dan balok berdasarkan kesalahan siswa kelas V sekolah dasar. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Purwanto, A. 2014. Karakteristik Berpikir Geometri Siswa Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele Pada Tingkat Analisis Kelas VII dan VIII SMP Negeri 1 Bondowoso Tahun Ajaran 2011/2012. Repository Tesis Universitas Jember (Online), (http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/21457), diakses 10 Mei 2016.

Reis, S. M. & Park, S. 2001. Gender Differences in High-Achieving Students in Math and Science. Journal For Education of The Gifted. 25, 52—73.

Rouadi, Naim and Husni Noha. 2014. Demostration in Euclidean Geometry. American International Journal of Social Science. Vol. 3 No. 1; January 2014

Suherman, Erman dkk. 2003. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung : JICA UPI.

Sutama, d. I. 2014. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Geometri SMA Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele Berbantuan Wingeom Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 14

Usiskin, Z. 1982. Van Hiele levels and achievement in secondary school geometry: Final report of the Cognitive Development and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry (CDASSG) Project. US: Department of Education, University of Chicago

Van de Walle, John A. 2001. Geometric Thinking and Geometric Concepts. In Elementary and Middle School. Mathe-matics: Teaching Developmentally, 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i5.6335

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan




JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License