TUTURAN MEMUJI OLEH GURU PEREMPUAN DALAM INTERAKSI PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INDONESIA
Abstract
Research on speech acts of female teachers in Indonesian language learning interaction is based on the patterns of communication that occurs between teachers and students in the context of learning in the classroom. The purpose of this study was to describe (1) the nature praised the speech act, (2) functions praised the speech act, and (3) the mode of speech act of praise spoken by women who work as teachers Indonesian. In addition to describing the form, function, and mode of speech acts raving, this study also tried to describe the use of language women are seen from the perspective of culture and the features it uses, namely (1) tag question, (2) avoidance of strong swear words, (3) superpolite form, (4) empathic stress, and (5) intensifiers.
Penelitian tentang tuturan guru perempuan dalam interaksi pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia ini dilandasi oleh pola komunikasi yang terjadi antara guru dan siswa dalam konteks pembelajaran di kelas. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mendeskripsikan (1) wujud tuturan memuji, (2) fungsi tuturan memuji, dan (3) modus tuturan memuji yang dituturkan oleh kaum perempuan yang berprofesi sebagai guru bahasa Indonesia. Selain mendeskripsikan wujud, fungsi, dan modus tuturan memuji, penelitian ini juga berusaha mendeskripsikan penggunaan bahasa perempuan dipandang dari sudut pandang budaya dan fitur-fitur yang digunakannya, yaitu (1) tag question, (2) avoidance of strong swear words, (3) superpolite form, (4) emphatic stress, dan (5) intensifiers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
Bogdan, R. C. dan Biklen S. K. 2003. Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods.
Boston: Ally and Bacon.
Brown, P. 1980. How and Why Are Women More Polite: Some Evidence From A Mayan Community. New York:
Praeger.
Halliday, M. A. K. dan Martin, J. R. 1993. Writing Science: literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.
Hardiningtyas, P. R. 2010. Bahasa Perempuan Sebagai Kajian Budaya Warna Lokal Jawa dalam Centhini 40 Malam
Mengintip Sang Pengantin dan Madam Kalinyamat: Penentuan Sastra Marginal. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar
Nasional Pemertahanan Bahasa, Magister Linguistik PPS UNDIP Semarang, 6 Mei 2010.
Jespersen, O. 1954. Language: It’s Nature, Development, and Origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Kurdghelashvili, T. 2015. Speech Acts and Politeness Strategies in an EFL Classroom in Georgia. International
Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering, (Online), 9 (1): 306—309,
(https://www.waset.org/abstracts/17320), diakses 9 Juni 2015.
Lakoff, R. T. 2004. Language and Woman's Place: Text and Commentaries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Miles, M. dan Huberman, A. M. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku SumberTentang Metode-Metode
Baru. Jakarta:UI Press.
Moleong, L. J. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Ku6alitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Searle, J. R. 1975. Indirect Speech Acts. Dalam Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech
Acts (hlm. 59—82). New York: Academic Press.
Yuliana, R., Rohmadi, M., dan Suhita, R. 2013. Daya Pragmatik Tuturan Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia
Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal BASASTRA Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan
Pengajarannya, (Online), 2 (1): 1—14, (http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/bhs_indonesia/article/view/2146/151),
diakses 11 Juni 2015.
Wierzbicka, A. 1991. Pragmatics, The Semantics of Human Interaction. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i7.6563
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License |