Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) is a scientific journal that contains and disseminate the results of research, in-depth study, and the ideas or innovative work in the field of science education. The innovative work of the S2 / S3 students, teachers and lecturers of the development of the education sector which is able to make a positive contribution to the schools and educational institutions the focus of this journal.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Firstly, the editor uses a plagiarism checker and also indexing machines to check whether there are any plagiarism activity happened during the writing process and product. If any plagiarism foud, the proposed article will be rejected. Each published article has been reviewed and suggested to be published by at least two reviewers. The reviewing process is single blind review, by removing authors's name and afiliation. A proofreader checks the article by removing any typomistake and improving the writing quality.

   

 

Open Access Policy

This journal Provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. JIP article on this issue can be accessed and downloaded for free of any charge including Article Processing Charger.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics

JOURNAL PUBLISHER CODE ETHICS

a) Determining the name of the journal, the scope of science, the timeline, and the accreditation.
b) Determining the membership of the editorial board.
c) Defining the relationship between publishers, editors, peer review and other parties in the contract.
d) Appreciating the confidentiality of the contributing researchers, author, editor, and peer review.
e) Applying the norms and regulations regarding intellectual property rights especially on the copyrights.
f) Conducting the policy reviews on the journals and present it to the authors, editorial board, peer review, and readers.
g) Making the behavior code guidelines for editor and peer review.
h) Publishing journals on a regular basis.
i) Ensuring the availability of resources for sustainability journal publishing.
j) Establishing cooperation and marketing network.
k) Preparing for the licensing and other legal aspects.

EDITOR CODE ETHICS

a) Improving the quality of publications.
b) Ensuring the process to maintain the quality of published papers.
c) Leading the freedom in delivering opinion.
d) Maintaining the integrity of the author's academic track record.
e) Conveying corrections, clarifications, withdrawal, and an apology if necessary.
f) Owning the responsibility for styling and formatting the paper, while the contents and any statements in the paper are the responsibility of the authors.                                                         
g) Assessing policies and attitudes of the published journal from the author and peer review to increase responsibility and minimize errors.
h) Having an open minded personality in accepting the new opinion or views of others who is different than their personal opinion.              
i) Prohibiting in defending our own opinion, the author or third parties which may result in a false decision.
j) Encouraging the author, in order to make improvements to the paper until it worth to publish.

PEER REVIEW CODE ETHIC

a) Receiving the task from the editors to review the papers and submit the review to the editor, as a matter of determining the feasibility of the paper for publication.
b) Reviewing the papers in a timely manner (on time) in accordance with the style guide based on scientific principles (method of data collection, the legality of the author, conclusions, etc.).
c) Reviewing the papers that have been corrected in accordance with the standards.
d) Encouraging the author to make improvements in the papers by providing feedback, suggestions, feedback, and recommendations.
e) Maintaining the author privacy by covering the results of the corrections, suggestions, and recommendations received by the author.
f) Reviewers must not review any papers who involve the reviewers in its work, directly or indirectly.
g) Following the guidelines for peer review in reviewing papers and assessing the evaluation form paper given by the editors.
h) Reviewing papers substantively by not correcting the grammar, punctuation and mistype.
i) Ensuring the principles of truth, novelty, and originality; prioritize the benefit of the paper for the development of science, technology, and innovation; also comprehending the impact on the development of science writing.
j) Prohibiting in defending own opinion, the author or third parties which may result on decision reference becoming non-objective.                                                                      
k) Upholding the value of the objectivity and free from any influences.                                 
l) Ensuring the confidentiality of findings in the paper until it is published.                               
m) Having broad understanding on the expertise and able to provide a review of the paper appropriately and correctly.
n) Refusing to do review if the research is not from the field of expertise. Instead, the peer review should be giving recommendation to the researcher if there is any other expert on the subjects. 
o) Having an open minded personality in accepting the new opinion or views of others who is different than their personal opinion.
p) Refusing to do the review if the deadline given by the editor cannot be reached. If absent the peer review should notify the editor as early as possible.     
q) The results of the review must be presented in an honest, objective, and supported by clear arguments. Some possible recommendations from the review are:
1) Accepted without repair
2) Accepted with minor repairs (after repaired by the author, it is not necessary to go to peer review)
3) Accepted with major repairs (after repaired by the author, return to the peer review for re-review)
4) Rejected and recommended for other publication
5) Rejected and recommended not to publish to any publication because scientifically the paper is flawed for the community.
r) Giving rejection for the last recommendation as the last choice related to the feasibility of the papers or with indication of severe violations of the code of ethics related to the author.
s) Reviewed papers aren’t allowed to be used for personal or third party interests. Moreover, The use of some of the contents of the reviewed papers must have received permission from the author.

AUTHOR/ARTICLE WRITER CODE ETHICS

a) Author collectively responsible for the work and the content of the article which cover methods, analysis, calculation, and its details.
b) Author immediately responds to the comments made by the peer review professionally and timely.
c) Author should inform the editor if they retract their paper.        
d) The author describes the limitations in the study.                       
e) Author respects the publishers if they demand to not to publish the findings in the form of interviews or through any other media before the publication.
f) The author informs the editor of (a) paper that is part of a phased research, multidisciplinary, and different perspectives.                                 
g) The author makes a statement that the papers submitted for publication is original, has not been published anywhere in any language, and not in the process of submission to another publisher.
h) If there is any error in the paper, the author should immediately notify the editor or publisher.                                       
i) The use of materials from other publications which is copyrighted, should be given a written permission and gratitude.
j) The author refers to the work of others as appropriate in citations and quotations which used in the paper.                                          
k) When delivering new discoveries or improving inventions the authors should mention the job previous researcher/writer/founder.                                   
l) The author is not allowed to give a bibliography of the publications if they do not read the publication.                                
m) If requested, the authors prepared the proof that the research has already met the requirements of the research ethics including the field notes.
n) Author adequately responds if there are any comments or feedback after the paper published.

Publication Ethics code referenced by the Journal of Humanities Education based on Buku Peraturan Kepala LIPI is sourced from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

 

Plagiarism Policy

PLAGIARISM INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO:

a. refer and/or quoting terms, words and/or sentences, data and/or information from a source without citing sources in the record citation and/or without stating the source adequately;
b. refer and/or quoting random terms, words and/or sentences, data and/or information from a source without citing a source in the record citation and/or without stating the source adequately;
c. using a source of ideas, opinions, views, or theory without stating the source adequately;
d. formulate the words and/or sentences themselves from the source of words and/or phrases, ideas, opinions, views, or theory without stating the source adequately;
e. submit a scientific papers produced and/or published by others as a source of scientific work without express adequately.

 

PREVENTION

In every article submitted to the Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan must be attached to a statement signed by the author that:
a. The article is free of plagiarism;
b. if at a later proved there is plagiarism in the article, the author is willing to accept the sanctions in accordance with the legislation.

SANCTIONS

a. reprimand;
b. letter of warning;
c. revocation of the article;
d. cancellation of publication.

 

Author Guidelines

Petunjuk bagi (Calon) Penulis

JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN (JIP)

  1. Artikel yang ditulis untuk JIP meliputi hasil telaah (hanya atas undangan) dan hasil penelitian di bidang kependidikan. Naskah diketik dengan program Microsoft Word, huruf Times New Roman, ukuran 12 pts, dengan spasi ganda, dicetak pada kertas A4 sepanjang maksimum 38 halaman, dan diserahkan dalam bentuk print-out sebanyak 3 eksemplar beserta soft-copy-nya. Pengiriman naskah uga dapat dilakukan sebagai attachment e-mail ke alamat: jurnalilmupendidikan@gmail.com.
  2. Artikel ditulis dalam bahasa Indonesia atau Inggris. Sistematika artikel hasil penelitian adalah judul; nama penulis, abstrak disertai kata kunci; pendahuluan, metode, hasil dan pembahasan, simpulan, serta daftar rujukan.
  3. Judul artikel dalam bahasa Indonesia tidak boleh lebih dari 12 kata, dan judul artikel dalam bahasa Inggris tidak boleh lebih dari 10 kata. Judul dicetak dengan huruf kapital di tengah-tengah, dengan ukuran huruf 14 poin.
  4. Nama penulis artikel dicantumkan tanpa gelar akademik, disertai nama dan alamat lembaga asal, dan ditempatkan di bawah judul artikel. Dalam hal naskah ditulis oleh tim, penyunting hanya berhubungan dengan penulis utama atau penulis yang namanya tercantum pada urutan pertama. Penulis utama harus mencantumkan alamat korespondensi atau e-mail.
  5. Abstrak dan kata kunci ditulis dalam dua bahasa (Indonesia dan Inggris). Panjang masing-masing abstrak maksimum 150 kata, sedangkan jumlah kata kunci 3-5 kata atau gabungan kata. Abstrak minimal berisi judul artikel, tujuan, metode, dan hasil penelitian.
  6. Bagian pendahuluan berisi latar belakang, konteks penelitian, hasil kajian pustaka, dan tujuan penelitian. Seluruh bagian pendahuluan dipaparkan secara terintegrasi dalam bentuk paragraf-paragraf, dengan panjang 15-20% dari total panjang artikel.
  7. Bagian metode berisi paparan dalam bentuk paragraf tentang rancangan penelitian, sumber data, teknik pengumpulan data, dan analisis data yang secara nyata dilakukan oleh peneliti, dengan panjang 10-15% dari total panjang artikel.
  8. Bagian hasil penelitian berisi paparan hasil analisis yang berkaitan dengan pertanyaan penelitian. Setiap hasil penelitian harus dibahas. Pembahasan berisi pemaknaan hasil dan pembandingan dengan teori dan/atau hasil penelitian sejenis. Panjang paparan hasil dan pembahasan 40-60% dari total panjang artikel.
  9. Bagian simpulan berisi temuan penelitian yang berupa jawaban atas pertanyaan penelitian atau berupa intisari hasil pembahasan. Simpulan disajikan dalam bentuk paragraf.
  10. Daftar rujukan hanya memuat sumber-sumber yang dirujuk, dan semua sumber yang dirujuk harus tercantum dalam daftar rujukan. Sumber rujukan minimal 80% berupa pustaka terbitan 10 tahun terakhir. Rujukan yang digunakan adalah sumber-sumber primer berupa artikel-artikel penelitian dalam jurnal atau laporan penelitian (termasuk skripsi, tesis, disertasi). Artikel yang dimuat di Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan disarankan untuk digunakan sebagai rujukan.
  11. Perujukan dan pengutipan menggunakan teknik rujukan berkurung (nama akhir, tahun). Pencantuman sumber pada kutipan langsung hendaknya disertai keterangan tentang nomor halaman tempat asal kutipan. Contoh: (Davis, 2003: 47).
  12. Tata cara penyajian kutipan, rujukan, tabel, dan gambar mengikuti ketentuan dalam Pedoman Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (Universitas Negeri Malang, 2010) atau mencontoh langsung tata cara yang digunakan dalam artikel yang telah dimuat. Artikel berbahasa Indonesia menggunakan Pedoman Umum Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia yang Disempurnakan dan istilah-istilah yang dibakukan oleh Pusat Bahasa.
  13. Semua naskah ditelaah secara anonim oleh mitra bebestari (reviewers) yang ditunjuk oleh penyunting menurut bidang kepakarannya. Penulis artikel diberi kesempatan untuk melakukan perbaikan (revisi) naskah atas dasar rekomendasi/ saran dari mitra bebestari atau penyunting. Kepastian pemuatan atau penolakan naskah akan diberitahukan secara online.
  14. Segala sesuatu yang menyangkut perijinan pengutipan atau penggunaan software komputer untuk pembuatan naskah atau ihwal lain yang terkait dengan HaKI yang dilakukan oleh penulis artikel, berikut konsekuensi hukum yang mungkin timbul karenanya, menjadi tanggung jawab penuh penulis artikel.
  15. Penerimaan naskah, akses dan pengunduhan artikel sejak 1 Juni 2015 tanpa dipungut biaya.
  16. Daftar Rujukan disusun dengan tata cara seperti contoh berikut ini dan diurutkan secara alfabetis dan kronologis.

Buku:

Anderson, D.W., Vault, V.D., & Dickson, C.E. 1999. Problems and Prospects for the Decades Ahead: Competency Based Teacher Education. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Co.

Buku kumpulan artikel:

Saukah, A. & Waseso, M.G. (Eds.). 2002. Menulis Artikel untuk Jurnal Ilmiah (Edisi ke-4, cetakan ke-1). Malang: UM Press.

Artikel dalam buku kumpulan artikel:

Russel, T. 1998. An Alternative Conception: Representing Representation. Dalam P.J. Black & A. Lucas (Eds.), Children’s Informal Ideas in Science (hlm. 62-84). London: Routledge.

Artikel dalam jurnal atau majalah:

Kansil, C.L. 2002. Orientasi Baru Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Program Profesional dalam Memenuhi Kebutuhan Dunia Industri. Transpor, XX (4): 57-61.

Artikel dalam koran:

Pitunov, B. 13 Desember, 2002. Sekolah Unggulan ataukah Sekolah Pengunggulan? Majapahit Pos, hlm. 4 & 11.

Tulisan/berita dalam koran (tanpa nama pengarang):

Jawa Pos. 22 April, 1995. Wanita Kelas Bawah Lebih Mandiri, hlm. 3.

Dokumen resmi:

Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa. 1978. Pedoman Penulisan Laporan Penelitian. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 1990. Jakarta: PT Armas Duta Jaya.

Buku terjemahan:

Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Razavieh, A. 1976. Pengantar Penelitian Pendidikan. Terjemahan oleh Arief Furchan. 1982. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi, Laporan Penelitian:

Kuncoro, T. 1996. Pengembangan Kurikulum Pelatihan Magang di STM Nasional Malang Jurusan Bangunan, Program Studi Bangunan Gedung: Suatu Studi Berdasarkan Kebutuhan Dunia Usaha Jasa Konstruksi. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: PPS IKIP MALANG.

Makalah seminar, lokakarya, penataran:

Waseso, M.G. 2001. Isi dan Format Jurnal Ilmiah. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Lokakarya Penulisan Artikel dan Pengelolaan Jurnal Ilmiah, Universitas Lambungmangkurat, Banjarmasin, 9-11 Agustus.

Internet (karya individual):

Hitchcock, S., Carr, L., & Hall, W. 1996. A Survey of STM Online Journals, 1990-1995: The Calm before the Storm, (Online), (http://journal.ecs.soton.ac.uk/survey/survey.html), diakses 12 Juni 1996.

Internet (artikel dalam jurnal online):

Kumaidi. 1998. Pengukuran Bekal Awal Belajar dan Pengembangan Tesnya. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. (Online), Jilid 5, No. 4, (http://www.malang.ac.id), diakses 20 Januari 2000.

Internet (bahan diskusi):

Wilson, D. 20 November 1995. Summary of Citing Internet Sites. NETTRAIN Discussion List, (Online), (NETTRAIN@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu), diakses 22 November 1995.

Internet (e-mail pribadi):

Naga, D.S. (ikip-jkt@indo.net.id). 1 Oktober 1997. Artikel untuk JIP. E-mail kepada Ali Saukah (jippsi@mlg.ywcn.or.id).

 

 

 

Free-Processing, Access and Download Policy

This journal Provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. JIP article on this issue can be accessed and downloaded for free of any charge including Article Processing Charger.