Email this article 
Comparing Cognitive Learning Outcomes as the Impact of ADI-S and ADI Learning Models with Different Scientific Reasoning Abilities
Abstract
Abstract: This aims of the study to compare the cognitive learning outcomes of students who learned with Argument Driven Inquiry-Scaffolding (ADI-S) and Driven Argument Inquiry (ADI) with different scientific reasoning abilities. This research is a quasy experimental design. The instruments were used cognitive learning outcomes test and the test of scientific reasoning abilities. Data were analyzed using two way ANCOVA (2x2 factorial). The results showed: (1) learned with ADI-S on the reaction rate material get cognitive learning outcomes higher than learned with ADI, (2) student with high scientific reasoning abilities have better cognitive learning outcomes rather student with low scientific reasoning abilities both in ADI-S’s class and ADI’s class.
Key Words: ADI; ADI-S; scientific reasoning abilities; cognitive learning outcomes
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar kognitif siswa yang dibelajarkan menggunakan model Argument Driven Inquiry-Scaffolding (ADI-S) dan model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) dengan kemampuan penalaran ilmiah berbeda. Rancangan penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasy eksperimental design. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu tes hasil belajar kognitif dan tes kemampuan penalaran ilmiah. Data dianalisis menggunakan ANCOVA dua jalur (faktorial 2x2). Hasil analisis menunjukkan: (1) pembelajaran dengan model ADI-S pada materi laju reaksi memberikan hasil belajar kognitif yang lebih tinggi jika dibandingkan dengan model ADI, (2) siswa dengan kemampuan penalaran ilmiah tinggi memberikan hasil belajar kognitif lebih tinggi dibandingkan kemampuan penalaran ilmiah rendah baik pada kelas ADI-S maupun ADI.
Kata kunci: ADI; ADI-S; kemampuan penalaran ilmiah; hasil belajar kognitif
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amin, A. M., & Aloysius, D. C. (2016). Analisis Persepsi Dosen Terhadap Strategi Pembelajaran Reading Questioning and Answering (RQA) dan Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) pada Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi di Kota Makassar. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional II Kerjasama Prodi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP dengan Pusat Studi Lingkungan dan Kependudukan (PSLK), Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, 26 Maret 2016. Diambil dari: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321144722
Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., … Wu, N. (2009). PHYSICS: Learning and Scientific Reasoning. Science, 323(5914), 586–587. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167740
Coletta, V. P., Phillips, J. A., & Steinert, J. J. (2007). Interpreting Force Concept Inventory Scores: Normalized Gain and SAT Scores. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010106
Devetak, I., Drofenik Lorber, E., Juriševiè, M., & Glažar, S. A. (2009). Comparing Slovenian Year 8 and Year 9 Elementary School Pupils’ Knowledge of Electrolyte Chemistry and Their Intrinsic Motivation. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 10(4), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1039/B920833J
Effendy. (1985). Pengaruh Pengajaran Kimia dengan Cara Inkuiri Terbimbing dan dengan Cara Verifikasi terhadap Perkembangan Intelek dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Jurusan Kimia Tahun Pertama (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Jakarta: Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pengetahuan.
Hannafin, M. J., & Land, S. M. (2000). Technology and student-centered learning in higher education: Issues and practices. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 12(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03032712
Hasnunidah, N. (2016). Pengaruh Argument-Driven Inquiry dengan Scaffolding dan Kemampuan Akademik terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, dan Pemahaman Konsep Biologi Dasar Mahasiswa Jurusan PMIPA Universitas Lampung (Disertasi tidak diterbitkan). Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2014). Individual Versus Group Argumentation: Student’s Performance in a Malaysian Context. International Education Studies, 7(7), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p109
Jumaat, N. F., & Tasir, Z. (2016). A Framework of Metacognitive Scaffolding in Learning Authoring System Through Facebook. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(5), 619–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115627824
Kalay, B. A. (2017). Identifikasi Kesalahan Konsep Siswa pada Materi Bentuk Molekul dan Kepolaran Molekul dengan Teknik Certainty of Response Indeks (CRI) dan Perbaikannya Menggunakan Pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Kartika. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Verifikasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif dan Keterampilan Proses Ilmiah pada Materi Larutan Penyangga (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Katchevich, D., Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2013). Argumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory: Inquiry and Confirmatory Experiments. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9267-9
Kean, E., & Middlecamp, K. (1985). Panduan Belajar Kimia Dasar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Kolomuç, A., & Tekin, S. (2011). Chemistry Teachers’ Misconceptions Concerning Concept of Chemical Reaction Rate. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(2), 84–101.
Kurniawati, E. (2017). Pengaruh POGIL, Pendekatan Verifikasi dan Keterampilan Berpikir Ilmiah terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa pada Materi Laju Reaksi (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Kurt, S., & Ayas, A. (2012). Improving Students’ Understanding and Explaining Real Life Problems on Concepts of Reaction Rate by Using A Four Step Constructivist Approach. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(2), 979–992.
Lee, C.-Q., & She, H.-C. (2010). Facilitating Students’ Conceptual Change and Scientific Reasoning Involving the Unit of Combustion. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 479–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9130-4
Nnorom, D. N. R. (2013). The Effect of Reasoning Skills on Students Achievement in Biology in Anambra State. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 4(12), 2102–2104.
Nurdiansyah. (2018). Perbandingan Pendekatan Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Verifikasi Bermakna terhadap Pemahaman Konseptual dan Keterampilan Proses Sains ditinjau dati Kemampuan Berpikir Ilmiah (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Oloyede, O. I. (2012). The Relationship between Acquisition of Science Process Skills, Formal Reasoning Ability and Chemistry Achievement. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 8(1), 1–4.
Prediger, S., & Krägeloh, N. (2015). Low Achieving Eighth Graders Learn to Crack Word Problems: A Design Research Project for Aligning a Strategic Scaffolding Tool to Students’ Mental Processes. ZDM, 47(6), 947–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0702-7
Pucangan, A. A. S. N. A. (2017). Studi Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Melalui Scaffolding Konseptual dalam Problem Based Learning (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Rahayu, S. (2018). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Metakognisi Siswa Melalui Metacognitive Scaffolding pada Materi Termodinamika (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Rimadani, E. (2015). Penguasaan Konsep dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry Berstrategi Scaffolding pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor di SMA Negeri 1 Krian (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Santiasih, N. L., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Tika, I. N. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Sikap Ilmiah dan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V SD No. 1 Kerobokan Kecamatan Kuta Utara Kabupaten Badung Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3, 1–11.
Seifert, K., & Sutton, R. (2009). Educational Psychology (Second Edition). Diambil dari http://www.saylor.prg/courses/psych303/
Supasorn, S., & Promarak, V. (2015). Implementation of 5E inquiry incorporated with analogy learning approach to enhance conceptual understanding of chemical reaction rate for grade 11 students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00190G
Suyono, & Harianto. (2014). Belajar dan Pembelajaran: Teori dan Konsep Dasar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, Submicro, and Symbolic: The Many Faces of the Chemistry “Triplet.” International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435
Thalib, S. B. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan Berbasis Analisis Empiris Aplikatif. Jakarta: Kencana.
Walker, J. P., Sampson, V., Grooms, J., Anderson, B., & Zimmerman, C. O. (2012). Argument-Driven Inquiry in Undergraduate Chemistry Labs: The Impact on Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Argument Skills, and Attitudes Toward Science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 82–89.
Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jps.v8i2.14144
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Vocational Education Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
