Dampak Program Resitasi terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa pada Topik Fluida Dinamis

Irvany Nurita Pebriana, Sutopo Sutopo, Markus Diantoro

Abstract


Abstract: This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the program in improving students’ conceptual understanding. Research subjects were 21 first year Physics Education undergraduate students. Students’ conceptual understanding was assessed through the pretest given after lecture on fluid and posttest given after the use of a recitation program. The results showed that students' conceptual understanding improved significantly with the N-gain of 0.29. The number of problem and multi-contexts problem are the factors causing the success of the recitation program in improving students' conceptual understanding.Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas program dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep mahasiswa. Subjek penelitian sebanyak 21 mahasiswa S1 Pendidikan Fisika tahun pertama Universitas Negeri Malang. Peningkatan pemahaman konsep mahasiswa diases melalui pretest yang diberikan setelah perkuliahan topik mekanika fluida dan posttest setelah penggunaan program resitasi. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman konsep mahasiswa secara keseluruhan meningkat signifikan dengan nilai N-gain 0,29. Jumlah soal latihan yang relatif banyak dan beragam konteks menjadi faktor penyebab keberhasilan program resitasi dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep mahasiswa.

Keywords


understanding of concepts; dynamic fluid; recitation; pemahaman konsep; fluida dinamis; resitasi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bagus, I. J. R., Wartono, & Sutopo. (2016). Dampak Program Resitasi terhadap Topik Hukum III Newton. Pendidikan, 1(2), 256–264.

Besson, U. (2004). Students’ Conceptions of Fluids. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1683–1714. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000243745

Cohen, L., Manion L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education 6thEdition.USA: Routledge.

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics, 020119, 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods : A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, (May 1996), 64–74.

Kariotoglou, P., & Psillos, D. (1993). Pupils’ Pressure Models and their Implications for Instruction. Research in Science & Technological Education, 11(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514930110109

Koenig, K. M., Endorf, R. J., & Braun, G. A. (2007). Effectiveness of different tutorial recitation teaching methods and its implications for TA training. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010104

Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for Intermediete Statistics: Use and Interpretation, 2nd Edition. New

Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Loverude, M. E., Heron, P. R. L., & Kautz, C. H. (2010). Identifying and addressing student difficulties with hydrostatic pressure. American Journal of Physics, 78(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3192767

Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2004). SPSS for Introductory Statistics Use and Interpretation,

nd Edition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Ogilvie, C. A. (2009). Changes in students ’ problem-solving strategies in a course that includes context-rich, multifaceted problems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020102

Oliveira, P. C. & Oliveira, C. G. (2013). Using Conceptual Questions to Promote Motivation and Learning in Physics Lectures.

European Journal of Engineering Education, 38: 4, 417—424.

Reyza, M., Taqwa, A., & Hidayat, A. (2013). Deskripsi Penggunaan Program Resitasi dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membangun Free-Body Diagrams ( FBDs ), 5(1), 52–58.

Suarez, A., Kahan, S., Zavala, G., & Marti, A. C. (2017). Students’ conceptual difficulties in hydrodynamics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020132

Sutarja, M. C., Sutopo, & Latifah, E. (2016). Identifikasi Kesulitan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Fluida Statis.

Wagner, D. J., Cohen, S., & Moyer, A. (2009). Addressing student difficulties with buoyancy. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1179(may), 289–292. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3266739

Young, D. E., & Meredith, D. C. (2017). Using the resources framework to design, assess, and refine interventions on pressure in fluids. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010125




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i8.11503

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Irvany Nurita Pebriana, Sutopo Sutopo, Markus Diantoro

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License