Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Jaringan Tumbuhan dan Hewan Menggunakan Multiple Choice Open Reason Test

Putri Fitria Sartika, Herawati Susilo, Sulisetijono Sulisetijono

Abstract


Abstract: Please write the abstract in English and Intisari in Bahasa Indonesia max 100 words. These This study aims to develop diagnostic instruments to identify students' misconceptions in East Java. Misconceptions are important to be identified so as not to impede the students' learning process. The instrument used was a matter of multiple-choice open reason test (MCOR-Test) as many as 30 items that valid. The research sample of 117 students. The results showed that the average percentage of plant tissue misconceptions was 19.75%, while that of animal tissue was 13.83%. Furthermore, accurate and valid instruments are needed to detect conceptions on a broader scale.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan instrumen diagnostik untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi jaringan tumbuhan dan hewan di Jawa Timur. Miskonsepsi penting untuk diidentifikasi agar tidak menghambat proses belajar siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah Multiple Choice Open Reason Test sebanyak 30 butir yang telah memenuhi kriteria valid. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 117 siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rerata persentase miskonsepsi materi jaringan tumbuhan sebesar 19,75%, sedangkan pada materi jaringan hewan sebesar 13,83%. Selanjutnya, diperlukan instrumen yang akurat dan valid untuk mendeteksi miskonsepsi pada skala yang lebih luas.

Keywords


plant and animal tissue; multiple choice open reason test; misconception; jaringan tumbuhan dan hewan; multiple choice open reason test; miskonsepsi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifuddin, M. (2019). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Aplikasi M Learning Berbasis Android pada Materi Jaringan Hewan. Jurnal Biology Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 35—41.

Abraham, M., Grzybowski, E., Renner, J., & Marek, E. (1992). Understandings and Misunderstandings of Eighth Graders of Five Chemistry Concepts Found in Textbooks. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 29(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290203

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. (2015). Relations between Intuitive Biological Thinking and Biological Misconceptions in Biology Majors and Nonmajors. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1-8.

Evert, R., & Eichhorn, S. (2013). Biologi of Plant (Eight). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008.

Haryanti, Y. D. (2017). Model Problem Based Learning Membangun Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3(2),57-63.

Hubbard, J. K., Potts, M. A., & Couch, B. A. (2017). How Question Types Reveal Student Thinking: An Experimental Comparison of Multiple-True-False and Free-Response Formats. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), 1-13.

Khairaty, N. I., Taiyeb, A. M., & Hartati, H. (2018). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Sistem Peredaran Darah dengan menggunakan Three-Tier Test di Kelas XI IPA 1 SMA Negeri 1 Bontonompo. Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan, 6(1), 7-13.

Kose, E. O., Pekel, O., & Hasenekoglu, I. (2009). Misconceptions and Alternative Concepts in Biology Textbooks: Photosynthesis and Respiration Ideas Falsas Conceptos Alternativos en libros de texto de biología: Fotosíntesis y Respiración. Journal of Science Education, (10), 91-94.

Krishnan, S. R., & Howe, A. C. (1994). The Mole Concept: Developing an Instrument to Assess Conceptual Understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(8), 653.

Kurniawan, Y., Suhandi, A., & Hasanah, L. (2016). The Influence of Implementation of Interactive Lecture Demonstrations (ILD) Conceptual Change Oriented toward The Decreasing of The Quantity Students That Misconception on The Newton’s First Law. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1708, 070007-1–070007-5.Doi: 10.1063/1.4941180.

Kusumawati, M. (2016). Identifikasi Kesulitan Belajar Materi Struktur – Fungsi Jaringan Tumbuhan pada Siswa SMA Negeri 3 Klaten Kelas XI Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5(7), 19-26.

Lin, J.-W. (2016). Examining the Factors That Influence Students’ Science Learning Processes and Their Learning Outcomes: 30 Years of Conceptual Change Research. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a

Maynard Wang, M., Wu, K., & Iris Huang, T. (2007). A Study on the Factors Affecting Biological Concept Learning of Junior High School Students. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 453–464.

Munawaroh, R., & Setyarsih, W. (2016). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa dan Penyebabnya pada Materi Alat Optik Menggunakan Three-tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika 5(2), 79-81.

Sakti, D. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Struktur Fungsi Jaringan Tumbuhan Dalam Buku Teks Biologi SMA Kelas XI Kurikulum 2013. 6(2), 23–30.

Salirawati, D. (2011). Pengembangan Instrumen Pendeteksi Miskonsepsi Kesetimbangan Kimia pada Peserta Didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(2), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v15i2.1095

Storey, R. D. (1990). Textbook Errors & Misconceptions in Biology: Cell Structure. The American Biology Teacher, 52(4), 213–218.

Suwarto. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik dalam Pembelajaran (1 ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Syahrul, D. A., & Setyarsih, W. (2015). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa dengan Three-tier Diagnostic Test pada Materi Dinamika Rotasi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika 4(3), 67-70

Tekkaya, C. (2002). Misconceptions As Barrier To Understanding Biology. Journal of Hacettepe University Education Faculty 23(1), 259–266.

Thomas, I. (2009). Critical Thinking, Transformative Learning, Sustainable Education, and Problem-Based Learning in Universities. Journal of Transformative Education, 7(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344610385753

Tortora, G & Derrickson, B. (2009). Principles of Anatomy and Physiology12th Edition. John Wiley & Sons.

Veloo, A., & Ali, R. M. (2014). Suatu Tinjauan Tentang Jenis-Jenis Dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia. 2(1), 87-95.

Verdonik, D. (2010). Between Understanding and Misunderstanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(5), 1364–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.007




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i8.13895

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Putri Fitria Sartika, Herawati Susilo, Sulisetijono Sulisetijono

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License