Email this article 
Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Pada Materi Termodinamika Dalam Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry for STEM Education
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims to explore students’ conceptual understanding of thermodynamic in ADI for STEM education. The study uses embedded experimental design methods. It involved 29 students of XI grade high school in Kupang. Instruments tes consisted of 13 reasoning multiple chooise questions. Wilcoxon test results is P=.000 with an average posttest higher than pretest shows that there is significant difference between students' conceptual understanding of before and after learning. The effect size value is 2,39. Students’ conceptual understanding of each indicator is also discussed.
Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian adalah mengetahui penguasaan konsep siswa pada materi termodinamika dalam pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) for STEM education. Penelitian menggunakan mixed method desain embedded experimental. Penelitian melibatkan 29 siswa kelas XI SMA di Kupang. Instrumen tes berupa 13 soal penguasaan konsep pilihan ganda. Hasil uji Wilcoxon sebesar p=.000 menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara penguasaan konsep siswa sebelum dan sesudah pembelajaran. Nilai effect size sebesar 2,39 menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran ADI for STEM education berpengaruh kuat terhadap penguasaan konsep.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adila, A. S. D. (2017). Deskripsi Kesulitan Mahasiswa pada Materi Termodinamika. Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM 2, 92-97.
Bejan, A. (2017). Evolution in Thermodynamics. Applied Physics Reviews, 4(1), 011305. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978611
Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2015). The Importance of Language in Students’ Reasoning About Heat in Thermodynamic Processes. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 759–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025246
Cochran, M. J., & Heron, P. R. L. (2006). Development and Assessment of Research-Based Tutorials on Heat Engines and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. American Journal of Physics, 74(8), 734–741. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2198889
Ding, N., & Harskamp, E. G. (2011). Collaboration and Peer Tutoring in Chemistry Laboratory Education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 839–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.498842
Georgiou, H., & Sharma, M. D. (2015). Does Using Active Learning in Thermodynamics Lectures Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Learning Experiences? European Journal of Physics, 36(1), 015020. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/1/015020
Grooms, J., Enderle, P., & Sampson, V. (2015). Coordinating Scientific Argumentation and the Next Generation Science Standards through Argument Driven Inquiry. 24(1), 6.
Haglund, J., & Jeppsson, F. (2014). Confronting Conceptual Challenges in Thermodynamics by Use of Self-Generated Analogies. Science & Education, 23(7), 1505–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9630-5
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M. H., & Sutomo, H. (2015). Argument-Driven Inquiry with Scaffolding as the Development Strategies of Argumentation and Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Lampung, Indonesia. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(9), 1185-1192.
Investigating the Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry in Laboratory Instruction. (2015). Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.Org/10.12738/Estp.2015.1.2324
Jannah, A. N., Yuliati, L., & Parno. (2016). Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Bertanya Siswa pada Materi Hukum Newton melalui Pembelajaran Inquiry Lesson dengan Strategi LBQ. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(3), 409-420.
Jensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014). Teaching to the Test…or Testing to Teach: Exams Requiring Higher Order Thinking Skills Encourage Greater Conceptual Understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9
Leinonen, R., Asikainen, M. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2015). Grasping the Second Law of Thermodynamics at University: The Consistency of Macroscopic and Microscopic Explanations. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020122
Liberatore, M. W. (2017). Effectiveness of Just In Time Teaching on Student Achievement in an Introductory Thermodynamics Course. 15.
Lie, R., Aranda, M. L., Guzey, S. S., & Moore, T. J. (2019). Students’ Views of Design in an Engineering Design-Based Science Curricular Unit. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9813-9
Meltzer, D. E. (2004). Investigation of Students’ Reasoning Regarding Heat, Work, and the First Law of Thermodynamics in an Introductory Calculus-Based General Physics Course. American Journal of Physics, 72(11), 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1789161
Mufit, F., Festiyed, F., Fauzan, A., & Lufri, L. (2018). Impact of Learning Model Based on Cognitive Conflict toward Student’s Conceptual Understanding. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335, 012072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012072
Prima, E. C., & Kaniawati, I. (2011). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dengan Pendekatan Inkuiri untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Penguasaan Konsep Elastisitas pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 16(1), 179. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v16i1.279
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421
Schnittka, C., & Bell, R. (2011). Engineering Design and Conceptual Change in Science: Addressing Thermal Energy and Heat Transfer in Eighth Grade. International Journal of Science Education, 33(13), 1861–1887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.529177
Vigeant, M., Prince, M., & Nottis, K. (2014). Repairing Engineering Students’ Misconceptions About Energy and Thermodynamics. Dalam R. F. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, D. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J. Nordine, & A. Scheff (Ed.), Teaching and Learning of Energy in K – 12 Education (hlm. 223–236). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05017-1_13
Walker, J. P., & Sampson, V. (2013). Learning to Argue and Arguing to Learn: Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Undergraduate Chemistry Students Learn How to Construct Arguments and Engage in Argumentation During a Laboratory Course: Learning to Argue and Arguing to Learn. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(5), 561–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21082
Walker, J. P., Sampson, V., Grooms, J., Anderson, B., & Zimmerman, C. O. (2012). Argument-Driven Inquiry in Undergraduate Chemistry Labs: The Impact on Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Argument Skills, and Attitudes Toward Science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 82-89.
Wattanakasiwich, P., Taleab, P., Sharma, M. D., & Johnston, I. D. (t.t.). Development and Implementation of a Conceptual Survey in Thermodynamics. 25.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i8.13917
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Dionisius Bukifan, Lia Yuliati, Supriyono Koes Handayanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
