Proses Berpikir Siswa SMA dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Berdasarkan Teori Pemrosesan Informasi

Iska Agustina, Toto Nusantara, Santi Irawati

Abstract


Abstract: This study uses a descriptive exploratory approach because it aims to describe the thought processes of students in solving word problems based on information processing theory and involving high school students in grade XI. Research instruments in the form of interview guidelines and question instruments. Students are asked to complete the given word problem then interviewed to confirm their thought processes based on information processing theories, namely attention, perception, rehearsal, retrieval and encoding. Subjects were chosen based on the completeness of aspects of the thought process and suggestions from the teacher. The results showed that all subjects carried out all processes but in different ways.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif eksploratif karena bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita berdasarkan teori pemrosesan informasi dan melibatkan siswa kelas XI SMA. Instrumen penelitian berupa pedoman wawancara dan instrumen soal. Siswa diminta untuk menyelesaikan soal cerita yang diberikan kemudian diwawancarai untuk mengonfirmasi proses berpikirnya berdasarkan teori pemrosesan informasi, yaitu attention, perception, rehearsal, retrieval dan encoding. Subjek dipilih berdasarkan aspek kelengkapan, aspek proses berpikir, dan saran dari guru. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa semua subjek melakukan semua proses, namun dengan cara yang berbeda-beda.

Keywords


thought process; a matter of story; information processing theory; proses berpikir; soal cerita; teori pemrosesan informasi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriyani, D., Sa’dijah, C., Subanji, S., & Muksar, M. (2019). Students’ Construction Error in Translation among Mathematical Representations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 032098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032098

Alifah, N., & Aripin, U. (2018). Proses Berpikir Siswa Smp Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematik Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent dan Field Independent. JPMI – Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 1(4), 505–512.

Amamah, S., Sa’dijah, C., & Sudirman. (2016). Proses Berpikir Siswa SMP Bergaya Kognitif Field Dependent dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Berdasarkan Teori Pemrosesan Informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 237–245.

Anwar, R. B., & Rahmawati, D. (2018). Students’ Thinking Process In Creating Schematic Representation. Aksioma, 7(2), 300–307.

Astawa, I. W. P., Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2017). The Process of Student Cognition in Constructing Mathematical Conjecture. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.4278.15-26

Bahar, A., & Maker, C. J. (2015). Cognitive Backgrounds of Problem Solving: A Comparison of Open-ended vs. Closed Mathematics Problems. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1410a

Bakry., & Bakar, N. B. (2015). The Process of Thinking among Junior High School Students in Solving HOTS Question. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 4(3), 8. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v4i3.4504

Chinnappan, M., & Ghazali, M. (2018). Solution of Word Problems by Malaysian Students: Insights from Analysis of Representations. In J. Hunter, P. Perger, & L. Darragh (Eds.), Making waves, opening spaces (pp. 226–233). Auckland: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2016). Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms (Tenth edition). Boston: Pearson.

Egodawatte, G., & Stoilescu, D. (2015). Grade 11 Students’ Interconnected Use of Conceptual Knowledge, Procedural Skills, and Strategic Competence in Algebra: A Mixed Method Study of Error Analysis. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(3), 289–305.

Isroil, A., Budayasa, I. K., & Masriyah, M. (2017). Profil Berpikir Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2017.2.2.93-105

Kristayulita, K., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., & Sa’dijah, C. (2018). Identification of Students Errors in Solving Indirect Analogical Problems Based on Analogical Reasoning Components. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028, 012154. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012154

Kusaeri., Lailiyah, S., Arrifadah, Y., & Hidayati, N. (2018). Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Teori Pemrosesan Informasi. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2), 125–141.

Lortie-Forgues, H., Tian, J., & Siegler, R. S. (2015). Why is Learning Fraction and Decimal Arithmetic So Difficult? Developmental Review, 38, 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.008

Mairing, J. P. (2016). Thinking Process of Naive Problem Solvers to Solve Mathematical Problems. International Education Studies, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n1p1

Menon, V. (2016). Working Memory in Children’s Math Learning and its Disruption in Dyscalculia. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.05.014

Newton, K. J., Lange, K., & Booth, J. L. (2019). Mathematical Flexibility: Aspects of a Continum and the Role of Prior Knowledge. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1586629

Nur, I. R. D., Herman, T., & Ningsih, S. (2018). Working Memory in Students with Mathematical Difficulties. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335, 012114. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012114

Powell, S. R., Berry, K. A., & Benz, S. A. (2017). Teaching Students to Understand and Solve Word Problems. Texas Mathematics Teacher, 63(2), 6–12.

Putra, D. B. P., Kistofer, T., & Mufarrihah, I. (2017). Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika dalam Menyelesaikan Statistika Berdasarkan Teori Pemrosesan Informasi. Innovate, 3(2), 69–79.

Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2014). Developing Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Mathematics. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.014




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i10.14140

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Iska Agustina, Toto Nusantara, Santi Irawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License