ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI ASAM BASA PADA PEMBELAJARAN KONVENSIONAL DAN DUAL SITUATED LEARNING MODEL (DSLM)

Urwatil Wutsqo Amry, Sri Rahayu, Yahmin Yahmin

Abstract


Acid base is one of chemical topic that explain about concrete concepts, non concreteconcepts and concepts which involve symbolic representation. Complexity of acid base concept can create student misconceptions trend. DSLM can be an alternative of learnings’ model that can decrase misconceptions, so that identification of acid base misconceptions with learning become important to do. The research design is qualitative descriptive design. The research instrument is two-tier diagnostic test with reliability 0,869. There are seven misconceptions found in this research.

Materi asam basa membahas konsep yang teramati jelas (konsep konkrit), konsep yang tidak terlihat, dan konsep yang melibatkan representasi simbolik. Kompleksnya cakupan konsep pada materi asam basa dapat menimbulkan kecenderungan miskonsepsi bagi siswa. DSLM dapat menjadi alternatif model pembelajaran yang dapat diterapkan untuk meminimalisir miskonsepsi, maka identifikasi miskonsepsi pada konsep asam basa dengan pembelajaran DSLM menjadi penting untuk dilakukan. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah desain penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Instrumen penelitian berupa instrument tesdiagnostik two-tier dengan reliabilitas sebesar 0,869. Ditemukan tujuh miskonsepsi siswa terhadap materi asam basa.


Keywords


misconception; two-tier diagnostic test; acid base concept; miskonsepsi; tesdiagnostik two-tier; konsep asam basa

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akpinar, E. 2007.The Effect of Dual Situated Learning Model On Students’Understanding of Photosynthesis ans Respiration Concepts. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 6, No.3, 2007.

Artdej, R., dkk. 2010. Thai Grade 11 Students’ Alternative Conceptions for Acid-Base Chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, Vol. 28, No. 2, July 2010, 167—183.

Barke, H.D., dkk. 2009. Misconception in Chemistry: Addresing Perception in Chemical Education. German: Springer.

Chandrasegaran. A.L, dkk. 2007. The Development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instruments for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple level of representation. Journal of Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8 (3):293—307.

Demircioglu, G., dkk. 2005. Conceptual Change Achieved Through a New Teaching Program on Acid and Base. Journal of Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6 (1):36—51.

Demircioglu, G. 2009. Compaison of the effects of conceptual change texts implementated after and before instruction on secondary school students’ understanding of acid base concepts. Journal of Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 10 issue 2, Article 5, p.1, Desember.

Effendy. 2011. A-Level Chemistry for Senior High School Students Volume 2B. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Effendy. 2012. A-Level Chemistry for Senior High School Students Volume 2A. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Effendy. 2016. Ilmu Kimia untuk Siswa SMA dan MA Kelas X. Malang: Indonesia Academic.

Efendi, A. 2012. Pengembangan dan Penggunaan Instrumen Diagnostik Two Tier untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Tentang Asam Basa di SMA N 7 Malang. Tesis Tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Iskandar, S. M. 2011. Pendekatan Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Konstruktivistik (Ibnu, S., dkk, Ed). Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Karyadi, B. 1997. Kimia 2 untuk Sekolah Menengah Umum Kelas 2. Jakarta: PT Balai Pustaka.

Metin, M. 2011. Effects of Teaching Material Based on 5E Model Removed Preservice Teachers’ Misconceptions About Acid-Bases. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), Volume 5, Number 2, 2011.

Muchtar, Z. & Harizal. 2012. Analyzing of Students’ Misconceptions On Acid-Base Chemistry at Senior High Schools in Medan. Journal Education and Practice, Vol 3, No. 12.

Nakhleh, M.B. 1992. Why Some Students Don’t Learn Chemistry Chemical Misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education Volume 69 Number 3 March 1992.

Ozmen, H. 2004. Some Student Misconceptions in Chemistry: A Literature Review of Chemical Bonding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, June 2004.

Roth, J.K. 1986. Conceptual-Change Learning and Student Processing of Science Texts. Research Series No. 167: The Institute for Research on Teaching 252 Hall.

Sabekti, A.W. 2014. Kajian Kualitatif Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik pada Topik Kesetimbangan Kelarutan dan Perbaikannya menggunakan Dual Situated Learning Model (DSLM) berbasis MRs. Tesis Tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Sesen, B.A. & Tarhan, L. 2011. Active-Learning Versus Teacher-Centered Instruction for Learning Acid and Base. Research in Science & Technological Education, Vol. 29, No. 2, July 2011, 205—226.

She, H.C. 2002. Concept of A Higher Hierarchical Level Require More Dual Situated Learning Event for Conceptual Change: A Study of Air Pressure and Buoyancy. International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 24, No. 9, 981—996.

She, H.C. 2003.DSLM Instructional Approach to Conceptual Change Involving Thermal Expansion. Research in Science and Technological Education, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2003.

She, H.C. 2004.Facilitating Changes in Ninth Grade Students’ Understanding of Dissolution and Diffusion through DSLM Instruction. Research in Science Education 34:503—525, 2004.

She, H.C. 2004. Fostering Radical Conceptual Change Throught Dual Situated Learning Model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 41, No. 9. PP. 142—164 (2004).

She, H.C. & Liao, Y.W. 2009. Enhancing Eight Grade Students’s Scientific Conceptual Change and Scientific Reasoning through a Web-based Learning Program. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4):228—240.

Sheppard, K. 2006. High school students’ understanding of titrations and related acid-base phenomena. Journal of Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7 (1):32—45.

Silberberg & Amateis. 2012. Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change, Seventh Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Tüysüz, C. 2009. Development of Two-Tier instrumen and Assess Students` Understanding in Chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay, 4 (6):626—631.

Yuruk, N. 2007. The Effect of Supplementing Instruction with Conceptual Change Texts on Students’ Conceptions of Electrochemical Cells. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16:515—523.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i3.8636

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Urwatil Wutsqo Amry, Sri Rahayu, Yahmin Yahmin




JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License