ANALISIS STRATEGI THINKING MAPS DALAM PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI TERBIMBING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS

Dhedhie Armawan, Parno Parno, Lia Yuliati

Abstract


The purpose research to analyze of thinking maps strategy in guided inquiry learning to increase critical thinking ability and there relationship knowledge dimensional of thinking maps with critical thinking ability/Research design of mixed method embedded experimental conducted on 32 vocational students grade XII. Instruments form tests and thinking maps worksheets. Analyzed using N-Gain and effect size, and then analyzed posttest and thinking maps scores the stages of reduction, coding and results display. Conclution of research showed thinking maps strategy in guided inquiry learning can increase critical thinking ability. Conclution also showed their relationship between thinking maps with critical thinking ability is exist.

Tujuan penelitian ini ialah menganalisis strategi thinking maps dalam pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis serta keterkaitan dimensi pengetahuan thinking maps dengan kemampuan berpikir kritis. Rancangan penelitian mixed method embedded experimental dilakukan pada 32 siswa SMK kelas XII. Instrumen berupa soal tes dan lembar kerja thinking maps. Data tes dianalisis menggunakan N-Gain dan effect size, kemudian data posttest dan skor thinking maps dianalisis melalui tahapan reduksi, pengkodean, dan penyajian hasil. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan strategi thinking maps dalam pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dapat peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis. Hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan adanya keterkaitan antara thinking maps dengan kemampuan berpikir kritis.


Keywords


thinking maps; guided inquiry; critical thinking ability; thinking maps; inkuiri terbimbing; kemampuan berpikir kritis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afrizon, R. Ratnawulan, R. & Fauzi, A. 2012. Peningkatan Perilaku Berkarakter dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas IX MTsN Model Padang pada Mata Pelajaran IPA-Fisika menggunakan Model Problem Based Instruction. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika 1(1). (Online), (http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index,php.jppf/article/downloud/598/517, diakses 15 November 2016).

Arends, R.L. 2012. Learning to Teach: 9th Edition. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.

Chi, M. T.H. 2005. Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Prosses: Why Some Misconceptions are Robust. Journal of The Learning Science, 14 (2). (Online), (http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1, diakses 7 Februari 2017).

Cohen, L., Manion, Lawrence. & Morrison, Keith. 2007. Reserach Methods in Education Sixth Edition. New York, Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Edwards, P. 2011. The effects of Utilizing Thinking Maps to Influence Attitudes and Comprehension of Urban Elementary School Males. Disertasi diterbitkan pada ProQuest LLC. Michigan: Oakland University.

Eggen, P. dan Kauchak, D. 2012. Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Indeks

Engelhardt, P. V. dan Beichner. R.J. 2016. Students’ Understanding of Direct Current Resistive Electrical Circuits. American Journal of Physiscs, 72(1). (Online), (http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1614813, diakses 15 November 2016).

Eyler, J. dan Giles, D.D. 1997. The Importance of Program Quality in Service-learning. Dalam A.S. Waterman (Ed), Service Learning: Application from The Research (hlm. 57-76). Marwah: Lawrence Erlbaun Publisher.

Gulo, W. 2008. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Hake, R. R. 1998. Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66 (1):64—74. (Online), (http://otl.wayne.edu/wider/interactive_engegement.pdf, diakses 25 Februari 2016).

Hailikari, T. Katajavuori, N. & Lindblom, Y.S. 2008. The Relevance of Prior Knowledge in Learning and Instructional Design. Amarican Jounal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72 (5):78—84. (Online), (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2630138, diakses 25 Februari 2016).

Hyerle, D. 1995. Thinking mapss: Seeing is Understanding. Educational Leadership, 53 (1):85—89.

Hyerle, D., Suddreth, S. Suddreth, G. 2004. Thinking mapss (http://www.thinkingmaps.com, diakses 7 Februari 2016).

Hyerle, D. & Alper, L. 2012. Peta Pemikiran (edisi kedua). Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

King, M. dan Kitchener, K.S. 1994. Developing reflective Judgement: Understanding and Promoting Intelektual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolecents and Adult. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Kishor, N. 2012. Effect of Integrated Thinking Skill on Achievement in Physics of Senior Secondary School Student. International Education E-Journal, 1(3).

Knaggs, C. M. dan Schneider, R. M. 2012. Thinking Like a Scientist: Using Vee-Maps to Understand Process and Concepts in Science. Research in Science Education, 42(4). (Online), (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11165-011-9213-x)

Kuhlthau, C. 2004. Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services (edisi kedua). Westport: Libraries Unlimited.

Long, D. dan Carlson, D. 2011. Mind the Map: How Thinking mapss Affect Student Achievement. Network an On-line jounal for Teacher Research, 13 (2). (Online), (https://journal.library.wisc..edu/index.php/networks/article/downloud/262/496) diakses 15 Februari 2016).

Marsandi. 1980. Sistem Belajar Tuntas (Mastery Learning). Jakarta: Puskur.

Mcmurray, M.A. Beisenherz. & Thompson, B. 1991. Realibility and Concurent Validity of a Measure of Critical Thinking Skill in Biology. Journal of Research in Science Teacher, 28 (2):183—192. (Online), (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.3660280208.pdf)

Murphy, E. 2004. An Instrument to Support Thinking in Online Asynchronous Discussions. Australasian Journal of Education Technology , 20 (3):295—315.

Murti, B. 2010. Berpikir Kritis (Critical Thinking). (Online), (http://fk.uns.ac.id/static/file/criticalthinking.pdf, diakses 7 Februari 2017).

Murtono., Setiawan, A. & Rusdiana, D. 2014. Fungsi Representasi dalam Mengakses Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Mahasiswa. Journal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 1 (2). (Online), (http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/JRKPF/artikel/view/1990, diakses 25 Juni 2015).

Mesa, J.C. Pringgle, R.M & King, N. 2014. Surfacing Student’s Prior Knewledge in Middle School Science Classroms Learning. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9 (3), (Online), (http://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-3612795211/Surfacing-Students-Prior-Knowledge-in-middle-school, diakses 7 Februari 2017).

Nugrahani, R. 2007. Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Visual Berbentuk Permainan Ular Tangga untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah Menengah. Journal of Education Research, 36 (1). (Online) (http://jounal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/LIK/article/view/524, diakses 7 Februari 2016).

Reed, T. Graham, D. Gibson, A. Hinshaw, S. & Williamson, F. 2014. Thinking mapss: An Innovative Way to Increase Sixth-grade Student Achievement in Social Studies. Disertasi diterbitkan pada ProQuest LLC. Minneapolis: Capella University

Schmidt, S.M. 2003. Learning by Doing Teaching the Process og inquiry. National Science Teacher Association, 27(1). (Online) (http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=48564, diakses 7 Januari 2017).

Sulaiman, F. 2013. The Effectivenes of PBL Online in Physics Student’s Creativity and Critical Thinking: A Case Study at University Malaysia Sabah. International Journal of Education and Research. 1 (3):1—18.

Stull, A. T dan Mayer, R. E. 2007. Learning by Doing Versus Learning by Viewing: Three Experimental Comparisons of Learner-Generated Versus Author-Provided Graphic Organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (4). (Online), (http://dx.doi.org/0.1037/0022-0663.99.4.808)

Svinicki, M. 1993. What they don’t know can hurt them: The Role of Prior Knowledge in Learning. The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education, 5(4). (Online) (http://podnetwork.org/content/uploads/V5-N4-Svinicki.pdf).

Tambade, P.S dan Wagh, B.G. 2011. Assessing the Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instructions in Physics at Undergraduate Level. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education. (Online) 3 (2):127—136. (http://www.phy.ilstu.edu/pte/publications/dealing_alt_con.pdf, diakses 15 Februari 2017).

Wenning, C.J. 2011. Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching. Journal Physics Teacher Education Online, 6 (2), (Online), (http://www.phy.ilstu.edu/JPtoe, diakses 10 November 2015).

Wollet, S.T. dan Lyneh, C.L. 1997. Critical Thinking in The Classroom: A Reflective Judgement Development Process Perspective. Accounting Education. A Journal of Theory, Practice and Research, 2 (1):59—78.

Valencia Community College. 2005. Rubric for the Analytical Assessment of Critical Thinking across the Curriculum. (Online), (http://valenciacollege.edu/academic-affairs/institutional-effectiveness-planning/institutiona-assessment/loa/documnets/TVCADeafts.pdf, diakses 7 Februari 2016).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i5.9157

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Dhedhie Armawan, Parno Parno, Lia Yuliati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License