Email this article Investigasi Literasi Spasial: Studi Kasus pada Siswa Auditori
Abstract
Abstract: Spatial literacy is one's understanding of spatial objects and relationships. Spatial literacy has visualization, reasoning, and communication domains. Learning style is one of the factors causing differences in students' spatial literacy. This study tries to investigate the spatial literacy of auditory students in solving spatial geometry problems. This type of research is a case study in one student of class XI MIPA-1 SMA Negeri 1 Taman Sidoarjo with a qualitative approach. The results of this study indicate that for each problem-solving step, students differ in achieving the indicators in each domain of spatial literacy. The student achieves all indicators in the visualization and reasoning domains. However, in the communication domain student do not achieve one indicator.
Abstrak: Literasi spasial merupakan pemahaman seseorang tentang objek dan hubungan spasial. Literasi spasial memiliki domain visualisasi, penalaran, dan komunikasi. Gaya belajar merupakan salah satu faktor penyebab perbedaan literasi spasial siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki literasi spasial siswa auditori dalam memecahkan masalah geometri ruang. Jenis penelitian ini yaitu studi kasus pada satu siswa kelas XI MIPA-1 SMA Negeri 1 Taman Sidoarjo dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa setiap tahap pemecahan masalah, siswa berbeda dalam memenuhi indikator pada setiap domain literasi spasial. Siswa memenuhi semua indikator pada domain visualisasi dan penalaran. Tetapi, pada domain komunikasi, siswa tidak memenuhi satu indikator.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alnujaidi, S. (2019). The difference between EFL students' preferred learning styles and EFL teachers' preferred teaching styles in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 90-97.
Awla, H. A. (2014). Learning styles and their relation to teaching styles. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 241-245. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.23.
Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215-241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024312321077.
Bednarz, S. W., & Kemp, K. (2011). Understanding and nurturing spatial literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21(0), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.004
Budai, L. (2013). Improving problem-solving skills with the help of plane-space analogies. CEPS: Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(4), 79-98. https://ojs.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/article/view/224.
Deringöl, Y. (2020). Middle school students perceptions of their self-efficacy in visual mathematics and geometry: a study of sixth to eighth grade pupils in Istanbul province, Turkey. Education 3-13, 1-12.
Diezmann, C., & Lowrie, T. (2009). Primary students spatial visualization and spatial orientation: An evidence base for instruction. In M. Tzekaki, H. Sakonidis, & M. Kaldrimidou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 417-424). Greece: PME.
Fernández, E., Nieto, Z., & Mendoza, L. (2019). Styles of reasoning according to the taxonomy structure of observed learning outcome of John Biggs in the students of geometry of the specialty of mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1329(1), 012005.
Hauptman, H., & Cohen, A. (2011). The synergetic effect of learning styles on the interaction between virtual environments and the enhancement of spatial thinking. Computers and Education, 57(3), 2106-2117. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.008.
Huang, T. C. (2019). Do different learning styles make a difference when it comes to creativity? An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 252-257.
Hsu, T. C. (2017). Learning English with augmented reality: Do learning styles matter?. Computers & Education, 106, 137-149.
İbili, E., Çat, M., Resnyansky, D., Şahin, S., & Billinghurst, M. (2020). An assessment of geometry teaching supported with augmented reality teaching materials to enhance students’ 3D geometry thinking skills. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 224-246.
Ke, F., & Clark, K. M. (2020). Game-based multimodal representations and mathematical problem solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 103-122.
Kurniawan, A. P., Anam, A. C., Abdussakir, & Rofiki, I. (2019). Integrasi etnomatematika dengan model pembelajaran probing-prompting untuk melatih komunikasi matematis siswa. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2019v7n1a1
Kusuma, A. B., & Untarti, R. (2018). The identification of the students’ mathematical communication skills error in form of pictures on the geometry of space subject. EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies, 10(2), 87-94.
Moore-Russo, D., Viglietti, J. M., Chiu, M. M., & Bateman, S. M. (2013). Teachers’ spatial literacy as visualization, reasoning, and communication. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.012
Kusuma, A. B., & Untarti, R. (2018). The identification of the students’ mathematical communication skills error in form of pictures on the geometry of space subject. EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies, 10(2), 87–94.
Moore-Russo, D., Viglietti, J. M., Chiu, M. M., & Bateman, S. M. (2013). Teachers’ spatial literacy as visualization, reasoning, and communication. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.012
Muslimin, & Sunardi. (2019). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa SMA pada materi geometri ruang. KREANO: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 10(2), 171-178. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v10i2.18323.
Nugraheni, Z., Budiyono, B., & Slamet, I. (2018). the impact of rigorous mathematical thinking as learning method toward geometry understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012121
Orey, M. (2010). Global text emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Zurich: The Jacobs Foundation.
Priyaadharshini, M., & Sundaram, B. V. (2018). Evaluation of higher‐order thinking skills using learning style in an undergraduate engineering in flipped classroom. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(6), 2237-2254.
Pusat Penilaian Kemendikbud. (2019). Diagnosa hasil ujian nasional tahun 2019 jenjang SMP, SMA/MA IPA, SMA/MA IPS, dan SMK. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Diakses dari https://puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/ pada tanggal 3 Oktober 2019.
Seloraji, P., & Eu, L. K. (2017). Students' performance in geometrical reflection using GeoGebra. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 65-77.
Singer, F. M., Voica, C., & Pelczer, I. (2017). Cognitive styles in posing geometry problems: implications for assessment of mathematical creativity. ZDM, 49(1), 37-52.
Suryono, F. B. (2019). Kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa SMP Sunan Klijogo Jabung dalam pemecahan masalah berdasarkan level Van Hiele (Tesis Diterbitkan). Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
Wijaya, A, Heuvel-panhuizen, M.V.D, Doorman, M, & Robitzch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555-584.
Wouters, P., & van der Meulen, E. S. (2020). The role of learning styles in game-based learning. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 10(1), 54-69.
Zhang, D. (2017). Effects of visual working memory training and direct instruction on geometry problem solving in students with geometry difficulties. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(1), 117-138.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jps.v8i4.14084
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Journal of Science Education Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
|
