Email this article Commognitive Students During Discussion Activities in Solving Skewness and Kurtosis Problems
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study, is to analyze students' commognitive activities during discussion activities in solving skewness and kurtosis questions. The research method used in this research is descriptive qualitative for semester 3 students of State University of Malang in the 2020-2021 academic year. Based on the results of the analysis of the completion of LKM 1 and LKM 2, all groups consisting of 17 groups have not met the commognitive component. So that KPL students randomly took several groups, namely group 1 and group 15 as research subjects. Their SK1 does not interpret the final result and then SK1 also does not reflect its skewness and kurtosis curves. Whereas for SK15 they also had errors in writing the symbols from the range, then their SK15 also did not describe the skewness and kurtosis curves, and SK15 also had errors in writing the formulas for the size of the location and errors in using the formula to find the value of the kurtosis.
Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini, untuk menganalisis commognitive mahasiswa pada saat aktivitas diskusi dalam menyelesaikan soal skewness dan kurtosis. Metode penelitian yang digunakan didalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif untuk mahasiswa semester 3 Universitas Negeri Malang tahun ajaran 2020-2021. Berdasarkan hasil analisis penyelesaian LKM 1 dan LKM 2 semua kelompok yang terdiri dari 17 kelompok ternyata masih belum memenuhi komponen commognitive. Sehingga mahawiswa KPL mengambil secara acak beberapa kelompok yaitu kelompok 1 dan kelompok 15 sebagai subjek penelitian. Kesimpulan hasil analisisnya SK1 mereka tidak menginterpretasikan hasil akhir dari perhitungannya dan kemudian SK1 juga tidak menggambarkan kurva skewness dan kurtosis. Sedangkan untuk SK15 mereka ada kesalahan dalam menuliskan simbol dari range, banyak kelas dan panjang kelas, kemudian SK15 mereka juga tidak menggambarkan kurva skewness dan kurtosis, dan SK15 juga ada kesalahan dalam menuliskan rumus ukuran letak dan dan kesalahan dalam menggunkan rumus mencari nilai kurtosisnya.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing With Understanding: Lessons From Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672056, 7(3-4), 271–311.
Bas, G., & Beyhan, O. (2010). Effects of multiple intelligences supported project-based learning on students’ achievement levels and attitudes towards english lesson. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(3), 365–385.
Berger, M. (2013). Examining mathematical discourse to understand in-service teachers’ mathematical activities. Pythagoras, 34(1), 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v34i1.197
Birisci, S. (2017). Identifying Effectiveness Of Online Group Study On Mathematical Problem Solving Attitude: A Comparative Study. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.814239
Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (2006). Sharing solutions: Persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121–151.
Donnelly, R. (2006). Blended problem-based learning for teacher education: Lessons learnt. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(2), 93–116.
Fauzi, T. C., Nusantara, T., & Hidayanto, E. (2019). Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Materi Teorema Pythagoras: Perspektif Commognition. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(12).
Giani, U., & Martone, P. (1998). Distance learning, problem based learning and dynamic knowledge networks. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 50(1), 273–278.
Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. Dordrecht: Springer.
Husamah, & Pantiwati, Y. (2014). Cooperative learning STAD-PjBL: motivation, thinking skills, and learning outcomes in Biology students. International Journal of Education Learning & Development (IJELD), 2/2, 77–94. http://www.ea-journals.org/.
Lazakidou, G., & Retails, S. (2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education.
Nardi, E., Ryve, A., Stadler, E., & Viirman, O. (2014). Commognitive analyses of the learning and teaching of mathematics at university level: The case of discursive shifts in the study of Calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2). 182-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918338
Ningsih, Y. L. (2020). Students’ Statistical Reasoning in Statistics Method Course. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 10.
OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]. (2013). PISA 2015 Collaborative problem solving framework. OECD Publishing.
O’Neil, H. F., Chuang, S. H., & Baker, E. L. (2010). Computer-based feedback for computer based collaborative problem solving. New York: Springer-Verlag., (pp. 261-279).
O’Shea, J., & Leavy, A. M. (2013). Teaching mathematical problem-solving from an emergent constructivist perspective: The experiences of Irish primary teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. New York Cambridge University Press.
Sfard, A. (2015). Learning, commognition and mathematics. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The Sage handbook of learning. London: Sage., (pp. 129-138). London: Sage. https://doi. org/10.4135/9781473915213.n12
Sudiono. (2020). Metode Diskusi Kelompok dan Penerapannya dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di SMP. CV Adanu Abimata.
Sunaengsih, C., & Sunarya, T. D. (2018). Pembelajaran Mikro. UPI Sumedang Press.
Tabach, M., & Nachlieli, C. (2016). Communicational perspectives on learning and teaching mathematics: Prologue. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3). 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9638-7
Tasara, I. (2018). Commognitive analysis of a teacher’s mathematical discourse on the derivative. In: Curtis, F, (ed.) BSRLM Proceedings. BSRLM 2017. British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics Conference. 11 Nov 2017 Liverpool, UK. BSRLM.
Walkington, C., Clinton, V., Ritter, S. N., & Nathan, M. J. (2015). How readability and topic incidence relate to performance on mathematics story problems in computer-based curricula. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1051–1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000036
Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., & Sulandra, I. M. (2019). A Commognitive Framework: The Process of Solving Mathematical Problems of Middle School Students. 14.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jps.v9i1.15080
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Journal of Science Education Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
|
