Email this article 
Pengaruh Pembelajaran Diskusi Kelas menggunakan Isu Sosiosains terhadap Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Baru pada Kemampuan Akademik Berbeda
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of class discussion with sosioscientific issue, difference in academic ability, and their interaction toward biology students’ science literacy in Universitas Negeri Malang. This study use a quasi experimental approach with pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The subject consist of two high and low academic ability classes. The research data were collected using scientific literacy test. Scientific literacy data were analyzed using ANACOVA with 5% significant level. The result showed that the classroom discussion with socioscientific issue had significant effect in increasing students’ science literacy and potentially increasing the science literacy of low academic ability student in line with the high academic student.
Abstrak: Pembelajaran biologi perlu difokuskan untuk memberdayakan literasi sains melalui integrasi isu sosiosains agar dihasilkan individu yang mampu merespon berbagai bentuk perkembangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh strategi pembelajaran, kemampuan akademik, dan interaksi keduanya terhadap literasi sains mahasiswa program sarjana biologi dan pendidikan biologi Universitas Negeri Malang. Jenis penelitian berupa penelitian semu eksperimen dengan rancangan non equivalent control group design. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari masing-masing 2 kelas berkemampuan akademik tinggi dan rendah. Data yang dikumpulkan berupa nilai tes literasi sains yang dianalisis dengan menggunakan ANACOVA dengan taraf signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi pembelajaran, kemampuan akademik, dan interaksi keduanya berpengaruh signifikan terhadap literasi sains mahasiswa.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anitah, S. (2009). Teknologi Pembelajaran. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.
Alvermann, D. E., & Hayes, D. A. (1989). Classroom Discussion of Content Area Reading Assignments: An Intervention Study. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(3), 305. https://doi.org/10.2307/747772
Arends, R I. (2012). Learning to Teach 9th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Arnesen, N.E. (2016). How Student Make Meaning from s Teaching Sequence on Socioscientific Issue. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Bani, S. (2016). Tantangan Lembaga Pendidikan di Tengah Persaingan Global. 5(2): 447-457.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., dan Cocking, R. R. (2002). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Corebima, A.D. (2007). Review On: Learning Strategy Having Bigger Potency to Empower Thinking Skill and Concept Gaining of Lower Academic Students. Paper Presented of International Conference “Redesigning Pedagogy” Organize by Nanyang Technologycal University. Singapore, 28-30 May 2007.
Dawson, V. & Venville, G.J. 2009. High School Stu¬dent’s Informal Reasoning and Argumentation about Biotechnology: An Indicator of Science Literacy?. International Journal of Science Educa¬tion. 31(11), 1421-1445.
Fong, L. L., Sidhu, G. K., & Fook, C. Y. (2014). Exploring 21st Century Skills among Postgraduates in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1406
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lut, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assesing 21st Century Skills. A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. United State of America: SAGE Publication.
Hadjioannou, X. (2007). Bringing the Background to the Foreground: What Do Classroom Environments That Support Authentic Discussions Look Like? American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 370–399. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207302173
Harris, J.M. (2013). Population, Resources, and Energy in the Global Economy: A Vindication of Herman Daly’s Vision. Medford USA: Global Development and Environment Institute.
Herlanti, Y., Rustaman, N.Y., Rohman, I., & Fitriani, A. (2012). Kualitas Argumentasi pada Diskusi Isu Sosiosaintifik Mikrobiologi Melalui Weblog. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 1(2), 168-177.
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal Issue and their Importance for Contemporary Science Education- A Paedagogical Justification and the State of the Art in Israel. International Jounal od Science and Mathematics Education. 39(4), 341-368.
Holbrook, J & Rannikamae, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 4(3). 275-288.
Illingworth, S., Silva, K.B., & Butler, A. 2012. Investigation of Socio-Biological Literacy of Science and Non-Science Students. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 20(2), 55-67.
Karisan, D. & Zeidler, D.L. (2017). Contectualization of Nature of Science withihn the Socioscientific Issue Framework: A Review of Research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology. 5(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.270186
Lathifah, A. S & Susilo, H. (2015). Penerapan Pembelajaran Socioscientific Issue melalui Metode Simposium berbasis Lesson Study untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritias Mahasiswa pada Matakuliah Biologi Umum. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi, Prodi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. Malang, 21 Maret.
Leedy, P. D. & Ormord, J, E. (2010). Practical Research: Planning and Design. 9th Edition. Upper Saddle River. New Jersey: Pearson, Merril Prentice Hall.
Lenke, J.L. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values. New Jersey: Ablex
Karisan, D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Contextualization of Nature of Science Within the Socioscientific Issues Framework: A Review of Research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.270186
Liu, X. (2009). Beyond science literacy: Science and the public. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 301–311.
Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Masalah dengan Strategi Kooperatif Model STAD pada Mata Pelajaran Sains untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V MI Jenderal Sudirman Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan. 2(5), 676-685.
Marrero, M.E. & Mensah, F.M.M. (2010). Scientific Decision Making the Ocean: Case Study of 7th Grade Life Science Students. Electronic Journal Science Education. 14(1). 1-27.
Mayaba, N.N. (2008). The Effect of A Scientific Literacy Strategy on Grade 6 and 7 learner’s General Literacy Skills. Thesis. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University.
Mlambo, V. (2012). An analysis of some factors affecting student academic performance in an introductory biochemistry course at the University of the West Indies. The Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 1(2), 79–92.
Nair, I. (2011). “New Scientific Literacies for an Interdependent World”, Diversity & Democracy, 14(2). (Online). http://www.diversityweb.org/DiversityDemocracy/vol14no2/nair.cfm, diakses 1 April 2018.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: National Academy of Science.
Newman‐Ford, L., Lloyd, S., & Thomas, S. (2009). An investigation in the effects of gender, prior academic achievement, place of residence, age and attendance on first‐year undergraduate attainment. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 1(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/17581184200800002
Nuangchalerm, P. (2010). Engaging Students to Perceive Nature of Science through Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction. European Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 34–37. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED508531
Osborne, J. (2005). “The Role Argumentation in Science Education. Research and Quality of Science Education”. Dordrecht, Nederlands: Springer.
Pantiwati, Y & Husamah. (2014). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP Kota Malang. Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Tahunan. Himpunan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia (HEPI). Kuta, 19-20 September 2014.
Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Hadjichambis, A. C., & Korfiatis, K. (2015). How Students’ values are intertwined with decisions in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(3), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2015.256a
Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 126 Tahun 2016 tentang Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru. (online). (http:// www.kopertis12.or.id/), diakses 26 Maret 2018.
PISA. (2015). Draft Science Framework.
Saad, M.I.M., Baharom, S., & Mokhsein, S.E. (2017). Scientific Reasoning Skill Based on Socio-scientific Issue in the Biology Subject. International Journal of Advance and Applied Sciences. 4(3), 13-18.
Sahoo, N. (2010). Thinking Globally, Working Locally at Gujarat Science City,” in ASTC Dimensions. Washington: Association of Science-Technology Centers Inc.
Sadler, T.D. (2011). Socio-scientific Issue in the Classroom: Teaching, Learning, and Research. The Netherlands. Springer.
Sherman, T. M. (1984). Proves Strategies for Successful Learning. Columbus: Bell & Howell Company.
Sulistyawati. (2015). Analisa Pemahaman Literasi Sains Mahasiswa yang Mengambil Mata Kuliah IPA Terpadu Menggunakan Contoh Soal PISA 2009. Sainteks. 12(1), 21-40.
Suwono, H., Pratiwi, H. E., Susanto, H., & Susilo, H. (2017). Enhancement of students’ biological literacy and critical thinking of biology through socio-biological case-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9622
Suwono, H., Pratiwi, H.E., Susanto, H., & Susilo, H. (2017). Enhancement of Students’ Biological Literacy and critical Thinking of Biology through Social-Biological Cased-Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Ipa Indonesia. 6(2), 213-220.
Tan, K.C.D. & Kim, M. (Eds.). 2012. Issue and Challenges in Science Education Research. New York, Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.
Toharudin, U. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.
Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social amd Behavioral Science. 59: 110-116.
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. 2012. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Winata, A., Seftia, I., & Cacik, S. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Awal Literasi Sains Mahasiswa pada Konsep IPA. Education and Human Development Journal. 1(1), 34-39.
Witherspoon, M., Carlson, J., Bridgeman, B., & Golub-smith, M. (2016). Leading a Classroom Discussion : Definition , Supporting Evidence , and Measurement of the ETS ® National Observational Teaching Examination ( NOTE ) Assessment Series, (August).
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i8.11373
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Amining Rahmasiwi, Herawati Susilo, Hadi Suwono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
