Email this article 
Perbedaan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis sebagai Dampak POGIL Berbantuan Advance Organizer dan POGIL Non Advance Organizer
Abstract
Abstract: The aim of the study to determine the differences in critical thinking skills of students who taught with POGIL assisted Advance Organizer and POGIL non Advance Organizer. This research is a quasy experiment. The instruments used were critical thinking skills tests. This test is a multiple choice test grounded. The result showed that there were differences in students critical thinking skills that were taught with POGIL assisted Advance Organizer and POGIL non Advance Organizer. This is shown by the experimental class get critical thinking skills of 62.9 higher than the control class of 55.7.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan POGIL berbantuan Advance Organizer dan POGIL non Advance Organizer. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu tes keterampilan berpikir kritis. Tes ini berupa tes pilihan ganda beralasan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan POGIL berbantuan Advance Organizer dan POGIL non Advance Organizer. Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa kelas eksperimen sebesar 62,9 lebih tinggi dibandingkan kelas kontrol sebesar 55,7.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul-kahar, R., Gaik, T. K., Hashim, R., Nurhaffi, M., & Abdullah, N. (2016). 7th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2014) Proceedings, (InCULT 2014), 675–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5
Clark, C. H., & Bean, T. W. (2010). Improving advance organizer research: Persistent problems and future directions. Reading World, 22(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388078209557671
Cutrer, W. B., Castro, D., Roy, K. M., & Turner, T. L. (2011). Use of an expert concept map as an advance organizer to improve understanding of respiratory failure. Medical Teacher, 33, 1018–1026. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.531159
Korur, F., Toker, S., & Eryılmaz, A. (2016). Effects of the Integrated Online Advance Organizer Teaching Materials on Students’ Science Achievement and Attitude. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 628–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9618-4
Ni, L. B., Rohadi, Nor Syuhada Binti, & Alfana, Hasni Binti. (2016). Advance Organizer : Cognitive Instructional Strategy. International Journal of Computer Networks and Wireless Communications (IJCNWC), 6(2), 53–57.
Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6(3), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.36-1103
Reid, N. (2014). Learning with Understanding in the Chemistry Classroom. Learning with Understanding in the Chemistry Classroom, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4366-3
Taber, K. S. (2014). Constructing Active Learning in Chemistry: Concepts, Cognition, and Conceptions. Learning with Understanding in the Chemistry Classroom, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4366-3
Zaman, T. U., Choudhary, F. R., & Qamar, A. M. (2015). Advance Organizers Help to Enhance Learning and Retention. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 2(3), 45–53. Retrieved from https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijhsse/v2-i3/5.pdf.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i9.11551
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Try Hartiningsih, Endang Budiasih, Sutrisno Sutrisno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
