Email this article 
Potensi Pembelajaran RICOSRE pada Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Kelas XI
Abstract
Abstract: The aim of this research is to determine the influence of learning model RICOSRE (Reading, Identifying Problem, Constructing Solution, Solving Problem, Reviewing Problem Solving, and Extending Problem Solving) toward XIth grade students’ Biology cognitive learning outcomes in SMAN 4 and SMAN 10 Malang. This research type is a quasi-experimental research with non-equivalent pretest posttest control group design. The sample used is the students in two classes each schools. Data collected in the form of pretest score and postes score. Data analysis using ancova technique and continued with LSD test that showed RICOSRE learning model significantly influenced the XIth grade students' learning outcomes with a corrected average of cognitive learning outcomes achievement is 26.9%.
Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran RICOSRE (Reading, Identfying problem, Constructing Solution, Solving Problem, Reviewing Problem Solving, and Extending Problem Solving) terhadap hasil belajar kognitif Biologi siswa kelas XI di SMAN 4 dan SMAN 10 Malang. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain non-equivalent pretest posttest control group. Sampel yang digunakan ialah siswa pada masing-masing dua kelas di setiap sekolah. Data yang dikumpulkan berupa skor pretes dan skor postes. Analisis data menggunakan teknik anakova dan dilanjutkan dengan uji lanjut LSD yang menunjukkan hasil model pembelajaran RICOSRE berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap hasil belajar Biologi siswa kelas XI dengan peningkatan rerata terkoreksi hasil belajar kognitif sebesar 26,9%.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allamnakhrah, A. (2013). Learning Critical Thinking in Saudi Arabia: Student Perceptions of Secondary Pre-Service Teacher Education Programs. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 197—210.
Amaliyah, R., Zubaidah, S., & Lestari, U. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E berbantuan Peta Konsep untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI SMA Laboratorium Malang. Makalah diseminarkan dalam Seminar IPA Pascasarjana UM, Malang, 8 Oktober 2016.
Bevevino, M., Dengel, J., & Adams, K. (1999). Constructivist theory in the classroom. internalizing concepts through inquiry learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 72, 275–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00098659909599406.
Bruce, B. C., & Casey, L. (2012). The practice of inquiry: a pedagogical ‘sweet spot’ for digital literacy? Computers in the Schools, 29, 191—206. doi:10.1080/07380569.2012.657994.
Carson, J. (2007). A Problem with Problem Solving: Teaching Thinking without Teaching Knowledge, 12(2), 7—14.
Ellis, K. (2005). Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 1–14.
Galbreath, J. (1999). Preparing the 21st Century Worker: The Link Between Computer-Based Technology and Future Skill Sets. Educational Technology. Desember, 14—22.
Hart, K. E. & Kristonis, W. A. (2006). Critical Analysis of an Original Writing on Social Learning Theory: Imitation of Film-Mediated Aggressive Models. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 1—7. (Online) http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Hart,%20Karen%20E,%20Imitation%20of%20Film-Mediated%20Aggressive%20Models%20NFAERJ%20V19%20N1%202006.pdf. Diakses 2 September 2017.
Healy, Cathy. (2002). Reading: What the Experts Say, The Lawdown on the National Reading Panel. Parent Educational Advocacy Training Center (PEATC).
Kaupp, J., Frank, B., & Chen, A. (2014). Evaluating Critical Thinking and Problem Solving in Large Classes: Model Eliciting Activities for Critical Thinking Development. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No 22 tahun 2016. Paparan Wakil Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan R.I Bidang Pendidikan tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Kholilah, T. N. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran CPS Dipadu Kooperatif STAD terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif, Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Biologi Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 10 Malang. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
King, F.J., Goodson, L., M.S., & Rohani, F. (2010). Higher Order Thinking Skills. Assessment & Evaluation Educational Service Program.
Kurnia, Z. L., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2016). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Melalui Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Reading-Concept Map-Cooperative Script (Remap-CS). Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(4), 617—621.
Lang, T., & Evans, R. (2006). Collaborative Inquiry Learning: Models, Tools, and Challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 349–377. doi:10.1080/09500690802582241.
Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Masalah dengan Strategi Kooperatif Model STAD pada Mata Pelajaran Sains untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V MI Jenderal Sudirman Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(5), 676—685.
Ogeyik, M. C., & Akyay, E. (2009). Investigating Reading Habits and Preferences of Student Teachers at Foreign Language Departments. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 28, 72—79.
Pedasta, M., Maeots, M., Siiman, L. A., Jong, T. D., Riesen, A., A. N., Kamp, A. T., Manoli, C. C., Zachria, Z. C., & tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of Inquiry-Based Learning: Definitions and The Inquiry Cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47—61.
Rosyida, F., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2015). Kemampuan Bertanya dan Berpendapat Siswa SMA Negeri Batu pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ke-2 Biologi/IPA dan Pembelajarannya di Jurusan Biologi FMIPA Universitas Negeri Malang 17 Oktober 2015, Hal 1663-1668. (ISBN: 978-602-73915-4-3).
Sholihah, M., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2016). Memberdayakan Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa dengan model Pembelajaran REMAP-RT. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(4), 628—633.
Siaw, F. Y. (2013). Beyond The Inspiration. Jakarta: Al Fatih Press.
Slavin, R. E. (2010). Co-operative Learning: What Makes Groupwork Work? Dalam H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Ed.), The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice, 16(3), 161—178.
Talat, A. & Chaudhry, H. F. (2014). The Effect of PBL and 21st Century Skills on Students‟ Creativity and Competitiveness in Private Schools. The Lahore Journal of Business, 2(2), 89—114
Trilling, B., & Hood, P. (1999). Learning, Technology, and Education Reform in the Knowledge Age. Educational Technology, 5 (1), 5—18. http://www.wested.org/online_pubs/learning_technology.pdf.
Wang, A. Y. (2012). Exploring The Relationship of Creative Thinking to Reading and Writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 7, 38—47.
Winkel, W. S. (2012). Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Gramedia.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i10.11662
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Ika Dewi Sumiati, Susriyati Mahanal, Siti Zubaidah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
