Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA pada Materi Fluida Statis

Ernila Siringo Ringo, Sentot Kusairi, Eny Latifah

Abstract


Abstract: This research was aimed to analyze the profile of students' ability to solve static fluid problems. The survey research involved 70 XII students of Malang State High School 4. The research instrument was in the form of three problem solving questions in the form of a description. The results showed the percentage of students in the expert category was still low at 31% and students in the novice category were quite high at 69%, so that students' overall problem solving abilities were classified as low. In this study, a number of student difficulties were still found, one of which was about the magnitude that affected the buoyancy force of objects in the fluid primarily on the problems of Archimedes' Law. Innovative learning efforts are needed to improve students' ability to solve problems.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis profil kemampuan siswa dalam memecahkan permasalahan fluida statis. Penelitian survei ini melibatkan 70 siswa kelas XII SMA Negeri 4 Malang. Instrumen penelitian berupa tiga butir soal pemecahan masalah berbentuk uraian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan persentase siswa kategori expert masih rendah yaitu sebesar 31% dan siswa kategori novice cukup tinggi sebesar 69%, sehingga kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa secara keseluruhan tergolong rendah. Pada penelitian ini, beberapa kesulitan siswa masih ditemukan salah satunya mengenai besaran yang memengaruhi gaya apung benda dalam fluida utamanya pada permasalahan Hukum Archimedes. Perlu upaya pembelajaran inovatif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan siswa dalam memecahkan masalah.


Keywords


problem solving skill; static fluid; kemampuan pemecahan masalah; fluida statis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2015). Analyzing the Many Skills Involved in Solving Complex Physics Problems. American Journal of Physics, 83(5), 459–467.

Argaw, A. S. (2017). The Effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Instruction on Students’ Motivation and Problem Solving Skills of Physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3).

Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative Inquiry Learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377.

Bunyamin, M. A. H., & Phang, F. A. (2012). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge among Undergraduate Education Degree Students at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 432–440.

Çepni, S., & Şahin, Ç. (2012). Effect of Different Teaching Methods and Techniques Embedded in the 5E Instructional Model on Students’ Learning about Buoyancy Force. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 4(2).

Chen, Y., Irving, P. W., & Sayre, E. C. (2013). Epistemic Game for Answer Making in Learning about Hydrostatics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(1).

Ding, L., Reay, N., Lee, A., & Bao, L. (2011). Exploring the role of conceptual scaffolding in solving synthesis problems. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(2).

Docktor, J., & Heller, K. (2009). Robust Assessment Instrument for Student Problem Solving. Dalam Proceedings of the NARST 2009 Annual Meeting, Garden Grove, CA (hlm. 1–19).

Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. A., & Yang, J. (2016). Assessing Student Written Problem Solutions: A Problem-Solving Rubric with Application to Introductory Physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1).

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2).

Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2). 6

Gök, T., & Sỳlay, I. (2010). The Effects of Problem Solving Strategies on Students’ Achievement, Attitude and Motivation. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 4(1), 2.

Goszewski, M., Moyer, A., Bazan, Z., & Wagner, D. J. (2013). Exploring student difficulties with pressure in a fluid. AIP

Conference Proceedings 1513, 154. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789675

Hull, M. M., Kuo, E., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2013). Problem-solving rubrics revisited: Attending to the blending of informal conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(1).

Koes-H, S., Muhardjito, & Wijaya, C. P. (2018). Scaffolding for Solving Problem in Static Fluid: A Case Study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1923(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019519

Kuczmann, I. (2017). The Structure of Knowledge and Students’ Misconceptions in Physics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1916(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5017454

Kusairi, S., Alfad, H., & Zulaikah, S. (2017). Development of Web-Based Intelligent Tutoring (iTutor) to Help Students Learn Fluid Statics. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 14(2).

Leak, A. E., Rothwell, S. L., Olivera, J., Zwickl, B., Vosburg, J., & Martin, K. N. (2017). Examining Problem Solving in Physics-Intensive Ph.D. Research. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020101

Lin, S.-Y., & Singh, C. (2015). Effect of scaffolding on helping introductory physics students solve quantitative problems involving strong alternative conceptions. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2).

Loverude, M. E., Heron, P. R. L., & Kautz, C. H. (2010). Identifying and Addressing Student Difficulties with Hydrostatic Pressure. American Journal of Physics, 78(1), 75–85.

Minogue, J., & Borland, D. (2015). Investigating Students’ Ideas About Buoyancy and the Influence of Haptic Feedback. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 187–202.

Ozcan, O., & Gercek, C. (2015). What are the Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Opinions about Context Based Approach in Physics Lessons? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 892–897.

Purnamasari, I., Yuliati, L., & Diantoro, M. (2018). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan 1059 Model Mental Siswa pada Materi Fluida Statis. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(10), 1299-1302.

Purwanto, R., & Yuliati, L. (2017). Eksplorasi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA pada Materi Fluida Statis. Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM, 2, 7.

Radovanović, J., & Sliško, J. (2013). Applying A Predict–Observe–Explain Sequence in Teaching of Buoyant Force. Physics

Education, 48(1), 28.

Ryan, Q. X., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., & Mason, A. (2016). Computer Problem-Solving Coaches for Introductory Physics: Design and Usability Studies. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010105

Santos, T. C., Pereira, L. N., Ferreira, P. J. G., de Lima, I. B., Vivaldini, T. C., Frugoli, A. D., & Frugoli, P. A. (2015). A Case Study on The Use of Practical Problem-Solving Activities to Quantitatively Improve Physics Learning in Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 2015International Conference on Operations Excellence and Service Engineering Orlando, Florida, USA, September 10-11, 2015.

Serway, R. A., Jewett, J. W., & Peroomian, V. (2010). Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics (Ninth edition). Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.

Sujarwanto, E., & Hidayat, A., & Wartono. (2014). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika pada Modeling Instruction pada Siswa SMA Kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 65-78.

Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., Bell, T., Mansfield, A., & Holmes, J. (2009). Role of the Teacher in Computer‐supported Collaborative Inquiry Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 221–243.

Walker, J., & Halliday, D. (2011). Fundamentals of Physics (9th ed., extended). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Walsh, L. N., Howard, R. G., & Bowe, B. (2007). Phenomenographic study of students’ problem solving approaches in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(2).

Wong, D., Lim, C., Munirah, S., & Foong, S. K. (2010). Student and Teacher Understanding of Buoyancy. Dalam Physics Education Research Conference.

Yuliati, L., & Parno. (2018). Exploration of Physics Problem-Solving Skills Within Phenomenon-Based Learning in Senior High School Students (hlm. 97–103). Dipresentasikan pada International Conference on Education.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i2.11951

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Ernila Siringo Ringo, Sentot Kusairi, Eny Latifah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License