Korelasi Kemampuan Bernalar dengan Kemampuan Menyimak Kritis Debat pada Siswa Kelas X
Abstract
Abstract: Before practicing to debate, a debater needs to have good critical listening skill to understand the content of the debate. By listening critically to the content of the debate, debater is expected to have the right point of view and also to think critically about other arguments. In critical listening of debate, listeners think actively from oral information in debate. The critical listeners must have a logical, reasonable, and not misguided way of thinking through a valid reasoning skill so that critical listening process can be done well. The result of this research shows there is a significant correlation between reasoning skill and critical listening of debate. If reasoning skill is high, critical listening skill of debate is high. If reasoning skill is low, critical listening skill of debate is low.
Abstrak: Sebelum berlatih berdebat, seorang pendebat harus memiliki keterampilan menyimak kritis yang baik untuk memahami isi debat. Dengan menyimak secara kritis isi debat, seorang yang berdebat diharapkan memiliki sudut pandang yang tepat dan juga berpikir kritis tentang argumen pihak lain. Dalam menyimak kritis debat, penyimak berpikir secara aktif dari informasi lisan dalam debat. Penyimak yang kritis harus memiliki cara berpikir logis, masuk akal, dan tidak sesat melalui kemampuan bernalar yang valid sehingga proses menyimak kritis debat dapat dilakukan dengan baik. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan terdapat korelasi positif yang signifikan antara kemampuan bernalar dengan kemampuan menyimak kritis debat. Jika kemampuan bernalar tinggi, kemampuan menyimak kritis debat tinggi. Jika kemampuan bernalar rendah, kemampuan menyimak kritis debat rendah.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdalhamid, F. (2012). Listening Comprehension Strategies of Arabic-Speaking ESL Learners. Colorado State University.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Boghossian, P. (2014). What is Inference? Philosophical Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9903-x
Bulgren, B. J., & Ellis, J. (2015). The Argumentation and Evaluation Guide: Encouraging NGSS-based Critical Thinking. Science Scope, 78–85.
De, A. (2009). Listening as an Easy Skill: Analysis of a Particular Context. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(2002), 29–41.
Facione, P. A. (2013). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assesment. http://www.student.uwa.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1922502/Critical-Thinking-What-it-is-and-why-it-counts.pdf
Fedrizzi, M., & Ellis, R. (2010). Debate. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Haroutunian-Gordon, S. (2011). Plato’s Philosophy of Listening. Educational Theory, 61(2), 125-139. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2011.00395.x
Marx, A., Heppt, B., & Henschel, S. (2017). Listening Comprehension of Academic And Everyday Language In First Language and Second Language Students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(3), 571-600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000333
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory. Behavioral and Brian Sciences, 34(2), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968
Mudjianto., & Susanto, G. (2010). Materi Pembelajaran Menyimak. Malang: A3 (Asih Asah Asuh).
Prince, P. (2013). Listening, Remembering, Writing: Exploring the Dictogloss Task. Language Teaching Research, 17(4), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813494123
Tighe, E. L., Spencer, M., & Schatschneider, C. (2015). Investigating Predictors of Listening Comprehension in Third-, Seventh-, and Tenth-Grade Students: A Dominance Analysis Approach. Reading Psychology, 36(8), https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2014.963270
Valdecasas, A. G., & Correas, A. M. (2010). Science Literacy and Natural History Museums. Journal of Biosciences, 35(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-010-0057-8
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent Developments in Second and Foreign Language Listening Comprehension Research. Language Teaching, 40(31), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.107/S0261444807004338
Zahro, A., & Eliyanah, E. (2011). Menyimak Beragam Wacana Lisan. Malang: Pustaka Kaiswaran.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i2.12003
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Firda Ariani, Dawud Dawud, Imam Agus Basuki
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License |