Email this article 
Analisis Penguasaan Konsep melalui Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry berbantuan Modul Terintegrasi STEM pada Materi Fluida Dinamis
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims to analyze the impact of guided inquiry learning integrated STEM module of the students’ physics conceptual understanding on dynamic fluid topic. The research sample was 34 students of class XI at SMAN 1 Singosari. The research instrument used 7 essay questions with a reliability value of 0.622. There is an increase of students' conceptual understanding through guided inquiry learning by the integrated STEM module (<g> = 0.652). The results of the calculation of the value of the effect size of 4.49 show that the influence of guided inquiry learning assisted by the integrated STEM module on dynamic fluid topic for the students’ physics conceptual understanding is included in the strong category. The level of students’ misconception decreases with increasing their conceptual understanding.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak pembelajaran guided inquiry berbantuan modul terintegrasi STEM terhadap penguasaan konsep fisika siswa pada materi fluida dinamis. Sampel penelitian adalah 34 siswa kelas XI di SMAN 1 Singosari. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan tujuh buah soal essay dengan nilai reliabilitas sebesar 0,622. Terdapat peningkatan penguasaan konsep siswa melalui pembelajaran guided inquiry berbantuan modul terintegrasi STEM (<g> = 0,652). Hasil perhitungan nilai effect size sebesar 4,49 menunjukkan bahwa pengaruh pembelajaran guided inquiry berbantuan modul terintegrasi STEM pada materi fluida dinamis terhadap penguasaan konsep siswa termasuk dalam kategori kuat. Tingkat miskonsepsi siswa pada materi fluida dinamis menurun seiring dengan meningkatnya penguasaan konsep mereka.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W., & Marek, E. A. (1992). Understandings and Misunderstandings of Eighth Graders of Five Chemistry Concepts Found in Textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290203
Alfika, Z. A., Mayasari, T., & Kurniadi, E. (2019). Modul STEM Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah dengan Tema Rumah Dome. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v7i1.1566
Bitting, K. S., McCartney, M. J., Denning, K. R., & Roberts, J. A. (2018). Conceptual Learning Outcomes of Virtual Experiential Learning: Results of Google Earth Exploration in Introductory Geoscience Courses. Research in Science Education, 48(3), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9577-z
Chan, C. K. Y., Yeung, N. C. J., Kutnick, P., & Chan, R. Y. Y. (2019). Students’ Perceptions of Engineers: Dimensionality and Influences on Career Aspiration in Engineering. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(3), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-09492-3
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed). London: New York: Routledge.
Constantinou, C. P., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Rybska, E. (2018). What Is Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning? In O. E. Tsivitanidou, P. Gray, E. Rybska, L. Louca, & C. P. Constantinou (Eds.), Professional Development for Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning, 5, 1–23). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91406-0_1
Crippen, K. J., & Archambault, L. (2012). Scaffolded Inquiry-Based Instruction with Technology: A Signature Pedagogy for STEM Education. Computers in the Schools, 29(1–2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2012.658733
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics, 020119, 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
English, L.D., & King, D.T. (2015). STEM Learning Through Engineering Design: Fourth-Grade Students’ Investigations in Aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1-18.
Hafizan, E., Shahali, M., & Halim, L. (2017). STEM Learning through Engineering Design: Impact on Middle Secondary Students’ Interest towards STEM, 8223(5), 1189–1211. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00667a
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive Egangement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six Thousand Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64- 74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Llewellyn, D. (2013). Teaching High Science Through Inquiry and Argumentation. California. Corwin A Sage Company.
Morgan, G. A. (Ed.). (2004). SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moore, T.J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and Integration of Engineering in K-12 STEM Education. In J. Strobel, S. Purzer, & M. Cardella (Ed.), Engineering in Precollege Settings: Research into Practice (pp. 35 60). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers National Academies Press.
Nurbaya, C. B., Yuliati, L., & Sutopo, S. (2019). Penguasaan Konsep Fluida Dinamis Siswa melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri dalam STEM. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(4), 510-515.
Peffer, M. E., & Ramezani, N. (2019). Assessing Epistemological Beliefs of Experts and Novices Via Practices in Authentic Science Inquiry. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0157-9
Pranita, M. Y., Wisodo, H., & Yuliati, L. (2019). Penguasaan Konsep Peserta Didik pada Materi Usaha dan Energi melalui Pembelajaran Authentic Berbasis Inquiry for STEM Education. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(6), 720-725.
Rivai, H. P., Yuliati, L., & Parno, P. (2018). Penguasaan Konsep dengan Pembelajaran STEM Berbasis Masalah Materi Fluida Dinamis pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(8), 1080-1088.
Srisawasdi, N., & Sornkhatha, P. (2014). The Effect of Simulation-Based Inquiry on Students’ Conceptual Learning and its Potential Applications in Mobile Learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2014.059996
Suarez, A., Kahan, S., Zavala, G., & Marti, A. C. (2017). Students’ Conceptual Difficulties in Hydrodynamics, 020132, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020132
Sung, E., & Kelley, T. R. (2018). Identifying Design Process Patterns: A Sequential Analysis Study of Design Thinking. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9448-1
Yerdelen-Damar, S., & Eryılmaz, A. (2019). Promoting Conceptual Understanding with Explicit Epistemic Intervention in Metacognitive Instruction: Interaction Between the Treatment and Epistemic Cognition. Research in Science Education. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9807-7
Young, D. E., College, G. A., & Peter, S. (2017). Using The Resources Framework to Design, Assess, and Refine Interventions on Pressure in Fluids, 010125, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010125
Yuliati, L., Parno, Yogismawati, F., & Nisa, I. K.( 2018). Building Scientific Literacy and Concept Achievement of Physics through Inquiry-Based Learning for STEM Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012022
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i6.13627
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Ika Khoirun Nisa, Lia Yuliati, Arif Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
