Email this article 
Penguasaan Konsep Siswa pada Materi Fluida Statis Dalam Pembelajaran STEM Disertai E-Formative Assessment
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims to explore students’ conceptual understanding of static fluid in STEM with e-formative assessment learning. The study uses embedded experimental design methods. It involved 30 students of XI grade high school in Sidoarjo. The pretest and posttest instruments consisted of 10 reasoning multiple chooise questions with reliability is 0.629. Wilcoxon test results is p = .000 with an average posttest higher than pretest shows that there is significant difference between students' conceptual understanding of before and after learning. The effect size value is 0.88. Students’ conceptual understanding of each indicator is also discussed.
Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui penguasaan konsep siswa pada materi fluida statis dalam pembelajaran STEM disertai e-formative assessment. Penelitian menggunakan mixed method desain embedded experimental. Penelitian melibatkan 30 siswa kelas XI SMA di Sidoarjo. Instrumen pretest dan posttest berupa 10 soal penguasaan konsep pilihan ganda disertai alasan dengan reliabilitas 0,629. Hasil uji Wilcoxon sebesar p=.000 dengan rata-rata posttest lebih tinggi daripada pretest menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara penguasaan konsep siswa sebelum dan sesudah pembelajaran. Nilai effect size sebesar 0,88 menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran STEM disertai e-formative assessment berpengaruh sedang terhadap penguasaan konsep. Penguasaan konsep siswa setiap indikator juga akan dibahas.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2015). Analyzing the Many Skills Involved in Solving Complex Physics Problems. American Journal of Physics, 83(5), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4913923
Ammase, A., Siahaan, P., & Fitriani, A. (2019). Identification of Junior High School Students’ Misconceptions on Solid Matter and Pressure Liquid Substances with Four Tier Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 022034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022034
Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM Education in Secondary Science Contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1349
Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018). Investigating the Impact of Blended Learning on Academic Performance in a First Semester College Physics Course. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0099-8
Buchanan, T. (2001). The Efficacy of a World-Wide Web Mediated Authentic Assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00132.x
Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The Development of a Two-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Instrument for Evaluating Secondary School Students’ Ability to Describe and Explain Chemical Reactions Using Multiple Levels of Representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90006F
Cruz, É., Dias, H., & Kortemeyer, G. (2011). The Effect of Authentic Assessment in Brazilian University Physics Courses. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 33(4), 4315–4315. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-11172011000400016
Dahalan, H. M., & Hussain, R. M. R. (2010). Development of Web-Based Assessment in Teaching and Learning Management System (e-ATLMS). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.144
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual Problem Solving in High School Physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020106
Dufresne, R. J., & Gerace, W. J. (2004). Assessing-to-Learn: Authentic Assessment in Physics Instruction. The Physics Teacher, 42(7), 428–433. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1804662
Green, D., Allan, C. N., & Crough, J. (2019). What Is the Purpose? Using Blended Learning Designs to Purposefully Focus on Student Engagement, Support and Learning. In C. N. Allan, C. Campbell, & J. Crough (Eds.). Blended Learning Designs in STEM Higher Education (pp. 35–58). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6982-7_3
Gynnild, V., Myrhaug, D., & Pettersen, B. (2007). Introducing Innovative Approaches to Learning in Fluid Mechanics: A Case Study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701433137
Irwansyah., Sukarmin., & Harjana. (2018). Analysis Profile of Student Misconceptions on The Concept of Fluid Based Instrument Three-Tier Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012020
Koes. H. S., Muhardjito., & Wijaya, C. P. (2018). Scaffolding for Solving Problem in Static Fluid: A Case Study. 030028. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019519
Köse, U. (2010). A Blended Learning Model Supported with Web 2.0 Technologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2794–2802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.417
Lin, J.-W., & Lai, Y.-C. (2013). Online Authentic Assessments with Social Network Awareness. Computers & Education, 66, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.008
Lou, S. J., Shih, R. C., Ray Diez, C., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). The Impact of Problem-Based Learning Strategies on STEM Knowledge Integration and Attitudes: An Exploratory Study Among Female Taiwanese Senior High School Students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9114-8
Mason, A., & Singh, C. (2016). Using Categorization of Problems as an Instructional Tool to Help Introductory Students Learn Physics. Physics Education, 51(2), 025009. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/51/2/025009
Michelini, M., & Stefanel, A. (2019). Innovation in Physics Teaching/Learning for the Authentic Success in Introductory Physics for Bio Area Degrees: The Case of Fluids. In M. Pietrocola (Ed.), Upgrading Physics Education to Meet the Needs of Society (pp. 153–168). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96163-7_10
Mujasam, M., Allo, A. Y. T., & Ansaruddin, M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Experiment-Based Student Worksheets with Map Concept in Understanding the Physics Concepts of Static Fluid Materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 032023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032023
Nutan, M. T. H., & Demps, E. L. (2014). Online Assessments in Pharmaceutical Calculations for Enhancing Feedback and Practice Opportunities. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 6(6), 807–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2014.07.010
Prima, E. C., & Kaniawati, I. (2011). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dengan Pendekatan Inkuiri untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Penguasaan Konsep Elastisitas pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 16(1), 179. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v16i1.279
Saab, N., van Joolingen, W., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2012). Support of the Collaborative Inquiry Learning Process: Influence of Support on Task and Team Regulation. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9068-6
Shishigu, A., Hailu, A., & Anibo, Z. (2017). Problem-Based Learning and Conceptual Understanding of College Female Students in Physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78035
Tseng, K.-H., Chang, C.-C., Lou, S.-J., & Chen, W.-P. (2013). Attitudes Towards Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) in a Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., Bell, T., Mansfield, A., & Holmes, J. (2010). Role of the Teacher in Computer‐Supported Collaborative Inquiry Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802516967
Wagner, D. J., Carbone, E., & Lindow, A. (2014). Exploring Student Difficulties with Buoyancy. 2013 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, 357–360. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2013.pr.077
Wang, K. H., Wang, T. H., Wang, W. L., & Huang, S. C. (2006). Learning Styles and Authentic Assessment Strategy: Enhancing Student Achievement in Web-Based Learning: Learning Styles and Authentic Assessment Strategy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00166.x
Wuttiprom, S. (2018). A Comparison of Students’ Understanding of Concepts in Fluid Mechanics through Peer Instruction and the T5 Learning Model. 16.
Yin, Y., Tomita, M. K., & Shavelson, R. J. (2014). Using Formal Embedded Authentic Assessments Aligned with a Short-Term Learning Progression to Promote Conceptual Change and Achievement in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.787556
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i6.13638
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Zahrotul Ula Irma, Sentot Kusairi, Lia Yuliati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
