Email this article 
Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa MA Menggunakan Metode Think Aloud Protocol (TAP)
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims to find out the misconceptions experienced by students during the learning process using think aloud protocol (TAP) and physics multiple choice tests (TPGF) on hydrostatic pressure materials. This research design uses mixed method design with embedded experimental design. Quantitative data is obtained through N-gain calculations that show a high category with a score of 0.7. This indicates that there is a significant change in the mastery of the student's hydrostatic pressure concept after learning activities. Qualitative data analysis based on the results of the think aloud protocol also shows how students experience misconceptions by pouring their thoughts into the analysis of problems using image illustrations.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui miskonsepsi yang dialami oleh siswa pada saat proses pembelajaran menggunakan think aloud protocol (TAP) dan tes pilihan ganda fisika (TPGF) pada materi tekanan hidrostatis. Desain penelitian ini menggunakan mixed method design dengan desain embedded experimental design. Data kuantitatif deiperoleh melalui perhitungan N-gain yang menunjukkan kategori tinggi dengan skor 0.7. Hal ini menandakan bahwa ada perubahan penguasaan konsep tekanan hidrostatis siswa secara signifikan setelah kegiatan pembelajaran. Analisis data secara kualitatif berdasarkan hasil think aloud protocol juga menunjukkan bagaimana siswa mengalami miskonsepsi dengan cara menuangkan pemikirannya pada analisis soal menggunakan ilustrasi gambar.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afifi, E. H. N. (2018). Perubahan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa pada Materi Fluida Statis Berdasarkan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Menggunakan Think Aloud Protocol. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Afifi, E. H. N., Warono, & Diantoro, M. (2016). Pengaruh Penggunaan Think Aloud Protocol Berdasarkan Model Discovery learning terhadap penguasaan Konsep fisika Kelas X MAN 2 Kota Probolinggo. 1, 134–144. http://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/3586
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill Companies.
Azizah, U., Parno, P., & Supriana, E. (2019). Identifikasi Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas XI dan XII pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(4), 484. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i4.12284
Brod, G., & Shing, Y. L. (2022). Are there Age-Related Differences in the Effects of Memory Congruency Effect Insights Gained from the Prior Knowledge on Learning? International Mind, Brain, and Education Society and Wiley Periodicals, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12320
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
de Lange, F. P., Heilbron, M., & Kok, P. (2018). How Do Expectations Shape Perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(9), 764–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.06.002
Dwilestari, D., & Desstya, A. (2022). Analisis Miskonsepsi pada Materi Fotosintesis dengan Menggunakan Peta Konsep pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 3343–3350.
Ellianawati, E., & Wahyuni, S. (2010). Pemanfaatan model self regulated learning sebagai upaya peningkatan kemampuan belajar mandiri pada mata kuliah optik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 6(1).
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(3), 178–186.
Ety Nur Inah. (2015). Peran Komunikasi dalam Interaksi Guru dan Siswa. Al-Ta’dib, 8(2), 150–167.
Goszewski, M., Moyer, A., Bazan, Z., & Wagner, D. J. (2013). Exploring student difficulties with pressure in a fluid. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513, 154–157. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789675
Guzzetti, B. J. (2002). Literacy in America: An encyclopedia of history, theory and practice (Vol. 1). ABC-CLIO.
Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(5). https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7205113
Han, J., & Kelley, T. R. (2022). STEM Integration through shared practices: examining secondary science and engineering technology students’ concurrent think-aloud protocols. Journal of Engineering Design, 1–23.
Hidayat, A., Indrawati, N., & Aprisal, A. (2022). Identifikasi Kesalahan Siswa Memahami Konsep Matematika Pada Materi Kubus Dan Balok. Jupika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 1–8.
Hu, J., & Gao, X. (Andy). (2017a). Using think-aloud protocol in self-regulated reading research. Educational Research Review, 22, 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.004
Hu, J., & Gao, X. A. (2017b). Using think-aloud protocol in self-regulated reading research. Educational Research Review, 22, 181–193.
Jingga, anisa astra, Mardiyana, & Triyanto. (2018). Pendekatan dan Penilaian Pembelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 Revisi 2017 yang Mendukung Peningkatan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(3), 286–299.
Köse, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: Using drawings as a research method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283–293. http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj3(2)/20.pdf
Küçüközer, H., & Kocakülah, S. (2008). Effect of simple electric circuits teaching on conceptual change in grade 9 physics course. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(1), 60–75.
Kurniasih, I., & Sani, B. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Konsep dan Penerapan. Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–162.
Kusairi, S. (2013). Analisis Asesmen Formatif Fisika Sma Berbantuan Komputer. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(3), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i0.1106
Lin, Y. C., Lin, Y. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2011). Development of a diagnostic system using a testing-based approach for strengthening student prior knowledge. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1557–1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.004
Lucariello, J., & Naff, D. (2013). How do I get my students over their alternative conceptions (misconceptions) for learning.
Metha Rozhana, K., & Harnanik, H. (2019). Lesson Study dengan Metode Discovery Learning dan Problem Based Instruction. Inteligensi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(2), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.33366/ilg.v1i2.1355
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191
Nisa, I. K., Yuliati, L., & Hidayat, A. (2020). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep melalui Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry berbantuan Modul Terintegrasi STEM pada Materi Fluida Dinamis. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(6), 809. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i6.13627
Nisa, M., Munawaroh, F., Yasir, M., & Retno, Y. (2022). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Konsep Tekanan Zat di Kelas VII SMP Negeri 2 BAngkalan. Jurnal Natural Science Education Research, 4(3), 183–192.
Ortlieb, E., & Norris, M. (2012). Using the think-aloud strategy to bolster reading comprehension of science concepts. Current Issues in Education, 15(1), 1–10.
Prastiwi, V. D., Parno, P., & Wisodo, H. (2017a). Profil Pemahaman Konsep Siswa SMA pada Materi Fluida Statis. Seminar
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i2.15193
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Erwinestri Hanidar Nur Afifi, Markus Diantoro, Wartono Wartono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
