The Relationship between Synchronous Online Training Preference and Online Student Engagements

Saida Ulfa, Rex Bringula

Abstract


Online training during the pandemic was commonly held using the synchronous learning method. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between synchronous online training preference, gender difference, and online student engagements (OSE).  This study was analyzed with Structural Equation Model (SEM) by using SmartPLS 3 software. The participants of this study involved 35 online training participants and produced the following findings: 1) synchronous online training preference has a positive relationship with OSE variables, 2) The relationship between OSE variables is positive,  3) a gender has a positive relationship with skills, participation, and performance, while gender has a negative relationship with emotions and synchronous online training preference.

Keywords


online student engagement; synchronous online training

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kennedy, G. (2020). What is student engagement in online learning and how do I know when it is there? https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/3362125/student-engagement-online-learning_final.pdf: MELBOURNE CSHE DISCUSSION PAPER.

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, DR (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250.

Al Mahadin, L., & Hallak, L. (2021). The Lack of Visual Interaction in Online Classes and its Effect on the Learning Experience of Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of a Bahraini Private University Students. Proceedings of the AUBH E-Learning Conference 2021: Innovative Learning & Teaching - Lessons from COVID-19. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3874420.

Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson, & F. Elloumi, Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca: Canada: Athabasca University.

Baber, H. (2021). Social interaction and effectiveness of the online learning – A moderating role of maintaining social distance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Education and Development Studies, https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-09-2020-0209.

Bag, S. (2015). A short review on structural equation modeling: Applications and future research. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 4, 64-69.

Baloran, ET, Hernan, JT, & Taoy, JS (2021). Course Satisfaction and Student Engagement in Online Learning Amid Covid-19 Pandemic: A Structural Equation Model. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 22(4), 1-12.

Caspi, A., Chajut, E., & Saporta, K. (2008). 'Participation in class and in online discussions: gender differences. Computers & Education. 50(3), 718-724.

Cesari, V., Galgani, B., Gemignani, A., & Menicucci, D. (2021). Enhancing Qualities of Consciousness during Online Learning. Behavioral Science, 2-13.

Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V., Hounsell, J., & McCune, V. (2008). “A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions”: Learning to be a university student. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 567–581. doi: 10.1080/03075070802373040

Deng, R. (2021). Emotionally Engaged Learners Are More Satisfied with Online Courses. Sustainability, 13, 2-19.

Dixson, MD (2015). Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). Online Learning. 19(4).

Fornell, C., & Larcker, DF (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Fredricks, JA, Blumenfeld, PC, & Paris, AH (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research.74, 59-109.

Hair, JF, Hult, TM, Ringle, CM, & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: Sage.

Henseler, J., Ringle, CM, & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The Use of Partial Least Square Path Modeling in International Marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing,Advances in International Marketing.Volume 20, 277–319.

Hospel, V., Galand, B., & Janosz, M. (2016). Multidimensionality of behavioral engagement: Empirical support and implications. International Journal of Educational Research. 77, 37-49.

Khan, RA, Atta, K., Sajjad, M., & Jawaid, M. (2021). Twelve tips to enhance student engagement in synchronous online teaching and learning. Medical Teacher, DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1912310.

Li, C., & Lalani, F. (2020, April 29). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how. Retrieved from World Economic Forum: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning

Malkin, A., Rehfeldt, R. A., and Shayter, A. M. (2018). An investigation of the efficacy of asynchronous discussion on students’ performance in an online research method course. Behav. Anal. Pract. 11, 274–278. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0157-5

McKnight-Tutein, G., & Thackaberry, USA (2011). Having it all: The hybrid solution for the best of both worlds in women's postsecondary Education. Distance Learning, 8(3), 17-22.

Morante, A., Djendii, V., Clark, H., & West, S. (2017). Australian Journal of Adult Learning. 57(2). Gender differences in online participation: examining a History and a Mathematics Open Foundation online course, 266-293.

Muilenburg, LY, & Berge, ZL (2005). Student barriers to online learning: a factor analytic study. Distance Education. 26, 29–48. doi:10.1080/01587910500081269.

Nguyen, T. (2015). The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309-319.

Ramírez-Correa PE, Arenas-Gaitán J, Rondán-Cataluña FJ (2015). Gender and Acceptance of E-Learning: A Multi-Group Analysis Based on a Structural Equation Model among College Students in Chile and Spain. PLoS ONE 10(10): e0140460. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140460

Ringle, CM, Silva, DD, & Bido, DS (2014). Structural Equation Modeling with The SmartPLS. Brazilian Journal of Marketing – BJM, 13(2), 56-73.

Yu, Z. (2021). The effects of gender, educational level, and personality on online learning outcomes during the COVID‑19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(14), 2-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239‑021‑00252‑3




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i7.15514

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Saida Ulfa, Rex Bringula

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License